They are two of the biggest names in technology and each is grappling with a huge and highly embarrassing debacle. On April 26th

admin2022-04-20  54

问题     They are two of the biggest names in technology and each is grappling with a huge and highly embarrassing debacle. On April 26th Amazon’s finance chief, Thomas Szkutak, said the firm was still trying to get to the bottom of a glitch that caused numerous websites it hosts for other businesses to crash or run painfully slowly during the previous week. The same day, Sony of Japan revealed that names, addresses, passwords and possibly credit-card details of 77m accounts were stolen when hackers gained access to the network it runs in 60 countries for its PlayStation online-gaming system, as well as for Qriocity, a service offering music, films and television shows.
    The two cases are different, but each has, in its own way, revived worries about the safety of storing and processing data over the internet—worries that have largely faded since the web’s early days, as countless individuals and companies have come to find that the benefits of doing things online greatly outweigh the risks. The two crises have also raised questions about the speed and quality of information provided by tech companies when confronted with system failures.
    Details of what happened at Amazon Web Services, which offers computing services and data storage over the internet "cloud", were still emerging as we went to press. But it seems that a serious problem in a data centre in northern Virginia triggered an outage that affected some of the firms using that center’s infrastructure, including Foursquare, a social-media company, and a number of other prominent start-ups. Some data seem to have been lost permanently. Amazon irritated its corporate customers with the vagueness of its early updates. Keith Smith, the boss of BigDoor, a gaming firm, complained in a blog post that these seemed to have been written by lawyers and accountants "rather than by a tech guy trying to help another tech guy.
    That is a black mark against a company that prides itself on being among the world’s most customer-centered. But none of this means the shift to cloud computing is about to go into reverse. Indeed, Forrester, a research outfit, reckons that the global market for cloud services could grow from $ 41 billion last year to $ 241 billion by 2020. One reason for this is that the savings that can be won by shifting computing to the cloud remain compelling; another is that Amazon-style snafus have been rare.
    Yet another is that managing one’s own network is hardly a guarantee of reliability. Ask Sony, whose online-gaming system, although delivered through the cloud, is hosted on its own servers. Services were suspended on April 20th after an intrusion was detected, but Sony then took almost a week to admit the risks to users’ personal data. The company insisted’ it had taken this long for it to realize the seriousness of the threat. But this claim was met with skepticism; and Sony’s failure to encrypt all of its customers’ data may bring it lawsuits and regulatory penalties.
The word "glitch" (Line 3, Para. 1) is closest in meaning to________.

选项 A、glamour
B、disgrace
C、malfunction
D、hacker

答案C

解析 本题是词汇题。根据题干定位到首段第二句,该句提到On April 26th Amazon’s finance chief, Thomas Szkutak, said the firm was still trying to get to the bottom of a glitch that caused numerous websites it hosts for other businesses to crash or run painfully slowly during the previous week (4月26日,亚马逊的财务主管托马斯.斯库塔克表示,该公司仍在设法解决一个问题,这个问题导致它所托管的许多网站在前一周崩溃或运行缓慢)。由此可见,glitch应该是网站死机和运行缓慢的原因,因此应该是与网站有关的贬义词,而且其意思和前面的bottom(根源)要构成恰当的搭配,故答案选C。A项是个褒义词,与所猜词的褒贬方向不一致;B项虽然是一个贬义词,但太抽象,不是导致网站死机和运行缓慢的具体原因. D项的词义和该词前面的the bottom of在语义上不搭配,依据句子含义,glitch应该不是一个人,而是电脑死机的原因。故均排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/lUi4777K
0

随机试题
最新回复(0)