首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Science is generally taken as meaning either (a) the exact sciences, such as chemistry, physics, etc., or (b) a method of though
Science is generally taken as meaning either (a) the exact sciences, such as chemistry, physics, etc., or (b) a method of though
admin
2014-12-11
27
问题
Science is generally taken as meaning either (a) the exact sciences, such as chemistry, physics, etc., or (b) a method of thought which obtains verifiable results by reasoning logically from observed fact.
If you ask any scientist, or indeed almost any educated person, "What is science?" you are likely to get an answer approximating to (b). In everyday life, however, both in speaking and in writing, when people say "science" they mean (a). Science means something that happens in a laboratory: the very word calls up a picture of graphs, test-tubes, balances, Bunsen burners, microscopes. A biologist, and astronomer, perhaps a psychologist or a mathematician is described as a "man of science": no one would think of applying this term to a statesman, a poet, a journalist or even a philosopher. And those who tell us that the young must be scientifically educated mean, almost invariably, that they should be taught more about radioactivity, or the stars, or the physiology or their own bodies, rather than that they should be taught to think more exactly.
This confusion of meaning, which is partly deliberate, has in it a great danger. Implied in the demand for more scientific education is the claim that if one has been scientifically trained, one’s approach to all subjects will be more intelligent than if one had had no such training. A scientist’s political opinions, it is assumed, his opinions on sociological questions, on morals, on philosophy, perhaps even on the arts, will be more valuable than those of a layman. The world, in other words, would be a better place if the scientists were in control of it. But a "scientist", as we have just seen, means in practice a specialist in one of the exact sciences. It follows that a chemist or a physicist, as such, is politically more intelligent than a poet or a lawyer, as such. And, in fact, there are already millions of people who do believe this.
But is it really true that a "scientist", in this narrower sense, is any likelier than other people to approach non-scientific problems in an objective way? There is not much reason for thinking so.
Take one simple test — the ability to withstand nationalism. It is often loosely said that "Science is international", but in practice the scientific workers of all countries line up behind their own governments with fewer scruples than are felt by the writers and the artists. The German scientific community, as a whole, made no resistance to Hitler. Hitler may have ruined the long-term prospects of German science, but there were still plenty of gifted men to do the necessary research on such things as synthetic oil, jet planes, rocket projectiles and the atomic bomb. Without them the German war machine could never have been built up.
Clearly, scientific education ought to mean the implanting of a rational, skeptical, experimental habit of mind. It ought to mean acquiring a method — a method that can be used on any problem that one meets — and not simply piling up a lot of facts. Put it in those words, and the apologist of scientific education will usually agree. Press him further, ask him to particularize, and somehow it always turns out that scientific education means more attention to the sciences, in other words — more facts. The idea that science means a way of looking at the world, and not simply a body of knowledge, is in practice strongly resisted. I think sheer professional jealousy is part of the reason for this. For if science is simply a method or an attitude, so that anyone whose thought-processes are sufficiently rational can in some sense be described as a scientist — what then becomes of the enormous prestige now enjoyed by the chemist, the physicist, etc. and his claim to be somehow wiser than the rest of us?
A hundred years ago, Charles Kingsley described science as "making nasty smell in a laboratory". A year or two ago a young industrial chemist informed me, smugly, that he "could not see what was the use of poetry". So the pendulum swings to and fro, but it does not seem to me that one attitude is any better than the other. At the moment, science is on the upgrade, and so we hear, quite rightly, the claim that the masses should be scientifically educated: we do not hear, as we ought, the counter-claim that the scientists themselves would benefit by a little education. Just before writing this, I saw in an American magazine the statement that a number of British and American physicists refused from the start to do research on the atomic bomb, well knowing what use would be made of it. Here you have a group of sane men in the middle of a world of lunatics. And though no names were published, I think it would be a safe guess that all of them were people with some kind of general cultural background, some acquaintance with history or literature or the arts — in short, people whose interests were not, in the current sense of the word, purely scientific.
Which of the following statements about scientists is true?
选项
A、Scientists tend to approach non-scientific problems in a more objective way than common people.
B、Most scientists believe arts and literature are of little use and hence think little of them.
C、Scientists are against the concept that science means a way of looking at the world partly for professional jealousy.
D、All scientist are totally in line with the government of their country.
答案
C
解析
事实细节题。文章第五段倒数第二句指出,科学是看待世界的一种方法这种观点遭到抵制是由于sheer professional jealousy,尾句解释作者这样认为的原因,故答案为[C]。由第四段前两句的设问可以排除[A]。尾段第二句举了一个化学家轻视文学和艺术的例子,但由此得出科学家们都认为文艺无用的观点属于推导过度,故[B]错。由最后一段所举例子可知并不是所有的科学家都完全为政府服务,且绝对项通常不是解,故排除[D]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ltdO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Vibrationsinthegroundareapoorlyunderstoodbutprobablywidespreadmeansofcommunicationbetweenanimals.Itseemsun
Vibrationsinthegroundareapoorlyunderstoodbutprobablywidespreadmeansofcommunicationbetweenanimals.Itseemsun
Vibrationsinthegroundareapoorlyunderstoodbutprobablywidespreadmeansofcommunicationbetweenanimals.Itseemsun
WhichofthefollowingnewspaperdoesNOTbelongtothebroadsheetofBritain?
WhenIfirstreadthislinebyEngland’sPoetLaureate,itstartledme.WhatdidMasefieldmean?Withoutthinkingaboutitmuch,
Aftertakingabriefhiatustoweathertherecession,aninvasionofBritainbysomeofAmerica’sbest-knownretailbrands—inclu
Aftertakingabriefhiatustoweathertherecession,aninvasionofBritainbysomeofAmerica’sbest-knownretailbrands—inclu
Revisionisrethinking,buttwomisconceptionsarebynomeansuncommonamongwriters,especiallyamongdevelopingwriters.Firs
Revisionisrethinking,buttwomisconceptionsarebynomeansuncommonamongwriters,especiallyamongdevelopingwriters.Firs
Revisionisrethinking,buttwomisconceptionsarebynomeansuncommonamongwriters,especiallyamongdevelopingwriters.Firs
随机试题
关于钠石灰,下列说法错误的是
男性和绝经后女性患高尿酸血症时,尿酸浓度应大于绝经前女性患高尿酸血症时,尿酸浓度大于
口服抗凝剂首选的监测指标是
理中丸加减治疗哪型呕吐
宣告失踪的法律后果是()。
我国人均林地面积不到世界人均水平的( )。
需求可能是连续的,也可能是间断的,连续性采购物品的需求通常有以下四种表现形式:趋势性、周期性波动、季节性变化和随机性变化。通常反映为一种连续的发展方向的是哪种表现形式()。
材料材料一加快转型升级,必须夯实“三农”基础。加强农业、农村、农民工作,是转型升级的重要内容,事关全面建设小康社会的大局。要发挥广东农业的特色优势,提升农业综合生产能力,围绕农民增收,创新农产品产销模式。加强以水利为重点的农业基础设施建
VisualBasic中窗体文件的扩展名是______。
TimeIfyoucan【T1】______,youcanknowthetimeofday.Butnooneknows【T2】______.【T3】______oursuccessinmeasuringthe
最新回复
(
0
)