首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
I don’t see a lot of TV commercials anymore, but those saccharine eHarmony ads featuring Natalie Cole trala-laing the blight-on-
I don’t see a lot of TV commercials anymore, but those saccharine eHarmony ads featuring Natalie Cole trala-laing the blight-on-
admin
2017-03-15
70
问题
I don’t see a lot of TV commercials anymore, but those saccharine eHarmony ads featuring Natalie Cole trala-laing the blight-on-humanity song "This Will Be (An Everlasting Love)" have been unavoidable the last couple of years.
The couples in the ads, many of them fed in the middle, seem to cling to each other with barely contained desperation, as though if they let go they will return to nights encumbered only by pints of ice cream for one and acres of Grey’s Anatomy DVDs. So when I became single last year and started signing up with dating sites, I didn’t even log on to eHarmony.
It turns out that if I had, I would not have been welcome. One has two choices on the first page of eharmony. com: "Man seeking a woman" and "Woman seeking a man." In the first place, I’m not "seeking" anyone. One seeks a job. Unless you’re a bounty hunter, you don’t seek another person. For my part, I’d like to meet a nice guy.
But the founder of eHarmony, Neil Clark Warren, has no interest in helping me meet a nice guy. Warren is a conservative Christian, a former recurring guest on James Dobson’s radio show, a man who used the overweening right-wing group Focus on the Family to help promote eHarmony in its early days—and a man who apparently believes that gays are some kind of different species.
Warren, a psychologist, told NPR’s Terry Gross a couple of years ago that "I don’t know exactly what the dynamics are [with gay couples]...We’ve done a deep amount of research on about 5,000 married people, but never on people who are same-sex. So we don’t know how to do that, and we think the principles probably are different, and so we’ve never chosen to do it." He noted later in the interview that "same-sex marriage in this country is largely illegal at this time, and we do try to match people for marriage."
Warren seems like a sweet guy in those ads, but this line of reasoning is transparently convenient: gays are just such an exotic and curious people, why, I could never understand them! And anyway their relationships are illegal—so best to ignore them completely.
A class-action lawsuit was inevitable. It was filed yesterday by a lesbian from (naturally) the San Francisco Bay Area. She claims that eHarmony’s no-gays policy is discriminatory under California law. The company replied that it might offer gay matching services in the future and denied that it discriminates.
Which is silly: of course it discriminates, in the most basic sense of the term—it doesn’t allow gays to use its site! Still, I think the lawsuit is a mistake, for two reasons: first, it once again casts gays in the role of victim. If you’re wondering why kids still use "faggot" as a slur to mean weak and simpering, it’s because gays too often whine about silly things like not being able to use a dating website for fat suburbanites. Second, and more important, gays manifestly do not need eHarmony. We already have too many dating sites. All of eHarmony’s competitors—match.com and its offshoot chemistry.com; true.com; personals.aol.com; lavalife.com and so on—allow gays. There are also many gay sites like gay.com and connexion.org, some of which could easily be charged with reverse discrimination. For instance, please visit manhunt.net for a second. I just did, and the main page says there are "OVER 21,739 MEN ONLINE NOW!" Manhunt offers nothing for straight men. Maybe my heterosexual brother should file a class-action lawsuit.
Recently eHarmony competitor chemistry.com produced a funny ad you should watch. The ad is smarmily self-serving, but it approaches eHarmony the right way: not with a lawsuit, but with ridicule.
What does the author think about the lawsuit?
选项
答案
Of course it discriminates. However, the lawsuit is a mistake. It once again casts gays in the role of victim. Gays manifestly do not need eHarmony. They already have dating sites.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/luSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
女士们、先生们:我非常高兴能利用英中贸协年会的机会向英国工商界朋友们致以诚挚的问候。多年来,英中贸协一直关心和支持中英关系发展,是堪称两国友好交流的桥梁和互利合作的纽带。在此,我谨对英中贸协及诸位长期为促进中英经贸合作所做的不懈努力和杰出贡献表示
下面你将听到联合国秘书长接受有关奖项的一段讲话。Mr.Chairman,Excellencies,LadiesandGentlemen,Ishouldlike,firstofall,toonceagainthank
作为一名运动员、教练员和体育管理者,尤其是作为奥运会的技术官员,我最大的体会是:在奥运会中,没有什么比运动员的利益更重要了。我们整个奥运计划的制定是以运动员需要为中心的。//在做任何决定时,我们都要问一问自己,什么对奥运会和残奥会运动员最有利。在国际单项体
A、China.B、TheUnitedStates.C、Japan.D、SouthAfrica.C根据原文第一段最后一句话,可知赞成核电站建设的国家有中国、南非和(美国的)布什政府,由此可推断,正确的选项只能是日本,因为该国未包括在上述国家中
假期往往是快乐与压力相伴而行。你需要陪伴家人、购买和互赠礼物、拜亲访友、享用节日大餐、打折疯狂采购、组织和参加聚会等。回归到日常生活节奏和相对更安静的工作场所,会使你因缺乏新鲜事物的刺激而精神不振。感到有点失落是一种正常的感觉;一旦回归到日常生活
A、TheprogramonChannelEightremindsmeofTVcommercials.B、TheproductadvertisedintheTVcommercialcannothelpcuremyi
继续教育向成人开设的课程包括,职业课程和休闲娱乐课程。即要么与个人工作相关,要么纯粹出于兴趣和娱乐。如今在英国,有数百万全日制和业余制的学生在继续教育学院和夜校学习,年龄从16到80岁不等。其中部分选择一些加强某项技能的专业课程,并为文凭而努力。还有人回到
Idon’tseealotofTVcommercialsanymore,butthosesaccharineeHarmonyadsfeaturingNatalieColetrala-laingtheblight-on-
Idon’tseealotofTVcommercialsanymore,butthosesaccharineeHarmonyadsfeaturingNatalieColetrala-laingtheblight-on-
随机试题
精囊腺MR解剖描述错误的是
下列不符合肾盂肾炎的病因发病的描述是
欲分析问学生学习成绩与血锌含量有无关系,可采用其假设检验的H0为
关于持有至到期投资,下列处理方法中正确的有()。
王老师在“物质的分类”一节课中,首先让学生对自己之前所学过的化学物质进行分类,学生在分类过程中,自己发现其中存在的问题;其次再对问题进行讲解,以便学生清楚地认识自己的问题所在;再次通过树状图的形式,将所学知识点进行展示,以便学生更好地记忆和理解;最后让学生
质子和中子是由更基本粒子即所谓“夸克”组成。两个强作用电荷相反(类似于正负电荷)的夸克在距离很近时几乎没有相互作用(称为“渐近自由”);在距离较远时,它们之间就会出现很强的引力(导致所谓“夸克禁闭”)。作为一个简单的模型,设这样的两夸克之间的相互作用力F与
道德楼宇的重建,除了靠制度地基,更要靠个体道德践履的“_________”。因为,道德构筑,需要你我他的身体力行,在公德的修复链中,没人能___________。依次填入画横线部分最恰当的一项是()。
发达国家中冠心病的发病率大约是发展中国家的三倍。有人认为,这主要归咎于发达国家中人们的高脂肪、高蛋白、高热量的食物摄人。相对来说,发展中国家较少有人具备生这种“富贵病”的条件。其实,这种看法很难成立。因为,目前发达国家的人均寿命高于70岁,而发展中国家的
A.葡萄糖B.菊粉C.内生肌酐D.对氨基马尿酸临床上常用于测定肾血流量的物质是
【B1】【B16】
最新回复
(
0
)