首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
There has been a lot of hand-wringing over the death of Elizabeth Steinberg. Without blaming anyone in particular, neighbors, fr
There has been a lot of hand-wringing over the death of Elizabeth Steinberg. Without blaming anyone in particular, neighbors, fr
admin
2022-08-26
30
问题
There has been a lot of hand-wringing over the death of Elizabeth Steinberg. Without blaming anyone in particular, neighbors, friends, social workers, the police and newspaper editors have struggled to define the community’s responsibility to Elizabeth and to other battered children. As the collective soul-searching continues, there is a pervading sense that the system failed her.
The fact is, in New York State the system couldn’t have saved her. It is almost impossible to protect a child from violent parents, especially if they are white, middle-class, well-educated and represented by counsel.
Why does the state permit violence against children? There are a number of reasons. First, parental privilege is a rationalization. In the past, the law was giving its approval to the biblical injunction against sparing the rod.
Second, while everyone agrees that the state must act to remove children from their homes when there is danger of serious physical or emotional harm, many child advocates believe that state intervention in the absence of serious injury is more harmful than helpful.
Third, courts and legislatures tread carefully when their actions intrude or threaten to intrude on a relationship protected by the Constitution. In 1923, the Supreme Court recognized the "liberty of parent and guardian to direct the upbringing and education of children under their control." More recently, in 1977, it upheld the teacher’s privilege to use corporal punishment against schoolchildren. Read together, these decisions give the constitutional imprimatur to parental use of physical force.
Under the best conditions, small children depend utterly on their parents for survival. Under the worst, their dependency dooms them. While it is questionable whether anyone or anything could have saved Elizabeth Steinberg, it is plain that the law provided no protection.
To the contrary, by justifying the use of physical force against children as an acceptable method of education and control, the law lent a measure of plausibility and legitimacy to her parents’ conduct.
More than 80 years ago, in the teeth of parental resistance and Supreme Court doctrine, the New York State Legislature acted to eliminate child labor law. Now, the state must act to eliminate child abuse by banning corporal punishment. To break the cycle of violence, nothing less will answer. If there is a lesson to be drawn from the death of Elizabeth Steinberg, it is this: spare the rod and spare the child.
From the article we can infer that Elizabeth Steinberg is probably the victim of_________.
选项
A、teachers’ corporal punishment
B、misjudgment of the court
C、parents’ ill-treatment
D、street violence
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/mMTO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Heishavingthermal______forhissoreshoulder.
Itwassuggestedthatallgovernmentministersshould______informationontheirfinancialinterests.(2007年中南大学考博试题)
Youshouldhavebeenmore______withthatcustomer;I’msurethatsellinghimthewatchwasapossibility.
Onlymenwithstrong______shouldclimbintheHimalayas.
Thekitchenwassmalland______sothatthedisabledwomancouldreacheverythingwithoutdifficulty.(2003年中国科学院考博试题)
Withoutsufficientevidence,Ihadto______thathisstatementwastrue.
Itis______thateveryoneofusshouldrebuildhisworldoutlook.(2007年中国矿业大学考博试题)
Theboyslippedoutoftheroomandheadedfortheswimmingpoolwithouthisparents’______.
PleasewriteonthetopicofShouldelderlypeoplelivewiththeiradultchildofabout200words.
随机试题
公务员辞去公职的法律后果。
心脏病患者最易并发感染性心内膜炎的情况为
属于“母病及子”的脏病传变是
下述与周期性瘫痪最无关的情况是
某市房地产开发公司A通过出让方式取得了一块土地的使用权,在签订的土地使用权出让合同中规定,此土地按照城市规划为住宅用地,需进行商品住宅建设。A公司通过调查研究,发现将临街的部分土地用于商业将更具市场潜力,同时也会对其后的商品楼带来升值作用,遂向有关部门提出
下列情形中,投标人已提交的投标保证金不予返还的是()。
填制和审核会计凭证是一种会计核算的专门方法。()
期货交易所的负责人由()任免。
甲厂和乙厂的车在行驶中相撞。甲厂车辆损失600元,车上货物损失1500元;乙厂车辆损失400元,车上货物损失500元。交通管理部门裁定甲厂负主要责任,应承担经济损失70%,适用的免赔率为15%;乙厂负次要责任,应承担经济损失30%,适用免赔率为5%。
Somefuturologistshaveassumedthatthevastupsurge(剧增)ofwomenintheworkforcemayportendarejectionofmarriage.Manywom
最新回复
(
0
)