首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their (
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their (
admin
2011-01-10
46
问题
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their (1) or their residency. But the proposal is set to (2) because of the very different laws on divorce that apply across the EU. The Commission wants to (3) problems over which law to apply when, for example, a married couple from one member state is (4) in another member state or when the couple is of different EU nationalities.
The (5) of member states are said to be (6) the idea and responded positively to a (6) which followed the (8) of a Commission Green Paper. With 15 percent of German divorces each year involving couples of different nationalities, the government of Berlin (9) see resolved the issue of which laws should apply.
But some member states are expected to resist the (10) which would involve allowing different divorce laws to be applied in their countries. For example, in Ireland where the divorce law states a couple must have been separated for four years, establish that their marriage has broken down and be offered (11) , a couple from Sweden could apply to an Irish court to allow them to divorce under Swedish law, where divorce can be (12) quickly.
The Irish government’s (13) to the Commission on the Green Paper stated: "Ireland is not in favor of allowing (14) to choose the applicable law, as this could be open to abuse.., such abuse would be likely to (15) most on divorce regimes, such as that of Ireland, which require a relatively long separation period." Ireland, like the UK, however, is allowed to choose whether to "opt-in" to such a proposal under rules agreed in the Amsterdam treaty. Malta has no such (16) but could (17) the proposal in the Council of Ministers since (18) approval will be required.
"It is going to lead to (19) ," said Geoffrey Shannon, Irish expert on the Commission on European Family Law, which examines the (20) of EU family law.
The proposal would also mean that judges would have to be trained in the divorce law of all 25 member states.
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their nationalities or their residency. But the proposal is set to run into difficulties because of the very different laws on divorce that apply across the EU.
The Commission wants to clear up problems over which law to apply when, for example, a married couple from one member state is resident in another member state or when the couple is of different EU nationalities.
The majority of member states are said to be in favor of the idea and responded positively to a consultation which followed the publication of a Commission Green Paper. With 15 percent of German divorces each year involving couples of different nationalities, the government of Berlin is particularly keen to see resolved the issue of which laws should apply.
But some member states are expected to resist the proposal which would involve allowing different divorce laws to be applied in their countries. For example, in Ireland where the divorce law states a couple must have been separated for four years, establish that their marriage has broken down and be offered mediation, a couple from Sweden could apply to an Irish court to allow them to divorce under Swedish law, where divorce can be obtained quickly.
The Irish government’s submission to the Commission on the Green Paper stated, "Ireland is not in favor of allowing spouses to choose the applicable law, as this could be open to abuse.., such abuse would be likely to impact most on divorce regimes, such as that of Ireland, which require a relatively long separation period."
Ireland, like the UK, however, is allowed to choose whether to "opt-in" to such a proposal under rules agreed in the Amsterdam treaty. Malta has no such safeguard but could veto the proposal in the Council of Ministers since unanimous approval will be required.
"It is going to lead to a two-tier situation," said Geoffrey Shannon, Irish expert on the Commission on European Family Law, which examines the harmonization of EU family law.
The proposal would also mean that judges would have to be trained in the divorce law of all 25 member states.
选项
答案
unanimous
解析
形容词。本题要求填形容词来修饰名词approval。unanimous意思为“全体一致的”,此意亦符合上下文意的需要。这里注意该词的拼写形式。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/mcuO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI三级口译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI三级口译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
IfWesternpeoplethinktheyarehealthyeaters,theywillhavetothinkagain.
I’veknownseveralpeoplewhohaveovercomenail-bitingsimplybybuying50nailfilesanddistributingthemeverywhere:inthei
Theirhostcarved,poured,served,cutbread,talked,laughed,proposedhealth.
Peoplerememberemotionallychargedeventsmoreeasilythantheyrecallthequotidian.Asexualencountertrumpsdoingthegroce
TheWorld’sHeaviestDrinkingCountriesPeopleintheUKareamongthemostprolificdrinkersintheworld,accordingtoar
Sincethereisnoevidencethathumancancer,asgenerallyexperienced,isinfectious,manypeoplebelievethatbecauseviruses
EcotourismThinkingaboutgoingoffthebeatenpathforyournextvacation?Ifso,youmightbeoneofthemanypeoplewhoa
随机试题
每类规划都有各自要解决的问题和特点,修建性详细规划也不例外,下面的叙述中不准确的是()。
复合硅酸盐水泥的代号为()。
甲公司与乙公司共同出资设立丙公司,经甲、乙公司双方协议,丙公司的董事长由乙公司委派,甲公司的出资比例为40%,股东按出资比例行使表决权。在这种情况下,()。
用于不确定度B类评定的信息来源一般包括()。
学生应该从小就开始学哲学。不然的话,他们会不假思索地接受某些传统价值观,而哲学正是教会他们对这些价值观进行质疑。上述议论预先假定了下面哪一项或哪些项?()Ⅰ.除非学生从小就学哲学。否则他们会接受任何观点。Ⅱ.即使在很小的年龄
鼻咽癌的组织学类型中,以哪一种最为多见
秒杀
材料1所表明的哲学观点及其局限性。结合材料3列宁阐述的思想,简述辩证唯物主义的物质范畴和自然科学物质结构学说的关系。
“就在21世纪的钟声即将敲响之前,从神州大地上消除了最后一块帝国主义侵略造成的殖民地的残痕,完整而彻底地完成了民族独立的历史使命。”完成这一历史使命的根本保证是()
某高校学生会计划举办一场“大学生网络创业交流会”的活动,拟邀请部分专家和老师给在校学生进行演讲。因此,校学生会外联部需制作一批邀请函,并分别递送给相关的专家和老师。请按如下要求,完成邀请函的制作:在“尊敬的”和“(老师)”文字之间,插入拟邀请的专家和老
最新回复
(
0
)