首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their (
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their (
admin
2011-01-10
52
问题
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their (1) or their residency. But the proposal is set to (2) because of the very different laws on divorce that apply across the EU. The Commission wants to (3) problems over which law to apply when, for example, a married couple from one member state is (4) in another member state or when the couple is of different EU nationalities.
The (5) of member states are said to be (6) the idea and responded positively to a (6) which followed the (8) of a Commission Green Paper. With 15 percent of German divorces each year involving couples of different nationalities, the government of Berlin (9) see resolved the issue of which laws should apply.
But some member states are expected to resist the (10) which would involve allowing different divorce laws to be applied in their countries. For example, in Ireland where the divorce law states a couple must have been separated for four years, establish that their marriage has broken down and be offered (11) , a couple from Sweden could apply to an Irish court to allow them to divorce under Swedish law, where divorce can be (12) quickly.
The Irish government’s (13) to the Commission on the Green Paper stated: "Ireland is not in favor of allowing (14) to choose the applicable law, as this could be open to abuse.., such abuse would be likely to (15) most on divorce regimes, such as that of Ireland, which require a relatively long separation period." Ireland, like the UK, however, is allowed to choose whether to "opt-in" to such a proposal under rules agreed in the Amsterdam treaty. Malta has no such (16) but could (17) the proposal in the Council of Ministers since (18) approval will be required.
"It is going to lead to (19) ," said Geoffrey Shannon, Irish expert on the Commission on European Family Law, which examines the (20) of EU family law.
The proposal would also mean that judges would have to be trained in the divorce law of all 25 member states.
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their nationalities or their residency. But the proposal is set to run into difficulties because of the very different laws on divorce that apply across the EU.
The Commission wants to clear up problems over which law to apply when, for example, a married couple from one member state is resident in another member state or when the couple is of different EU nationalities.
The majority of member states are said to be in favor of the idea and responded positively to a consultation which followed the publication of a Commission Green Paper. With 15 percent of German divorces each year involving couples of different nationalities, the government of Berlin is particularly keen to see resolved the issue of which laws should apply.
But some member states are expected to resist the proposal which would involve allowing different divorce laws to be applied in their countries. For example, in Ireland where the divorce law states a couple must have been separated for four years, establish that their marriage has broken down and be offered mediation, a couple from Sweden could apply to an Irish court to allow them to divorce under Swedish law, where divorce can be obtained quickly.
The Irish government’s submission to the Commission on the Green Paper stated, "Ireland is not in favor of allowing spouses to choose the applicable law, as this could be open to abuse.., such abuse would be likely to impact most on divorce regimes, such as that of Ireland, which require a relatively long separation period."
Ireland, like the UK, however, is allowed to choose whether to "opt-in" to such a proposal under rules agreed in the Amsterdam treaty. Malta has no such safeguard but could veto the proposal in the Council of Ministers since unanimous approval will be required.
"It is going to lead to a two-tier situation," said Geoffrey Shannon, Irish expert on the Commission on European Family Law, which examines the harmonization of EU family law.
The proposal would also mean that judges would have to be trained in the divorce law of all 25 member states.
选项
答案
unanimous
解析
形容词。本题要求填形容词来修饰名词approval。unanimous意思为“全体一致的”,此意亦符合上下文意的需要。这里注意该词的拼写形式。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/mcuO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI三级口译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI三级口译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
AsoundChina-U.S.relationshipservesthefundamentalinterestofthetwocountriesandtheirpeople,andthepeace,stability
IfWesternpeoplethinktheyarehealthyeaters,theywillhavetothinkagain.
I’veknownseveralpeoplewhohaveovercomenail-bitingsimplybybuying50nailfilesanddistributingthemeverywhere:inthei
TheWorld’sHeaviestDrinkingCountriesPeopleintheUKareamongthemostprolificdrinkersintheworld,accordingtoar
EcotourismThinkingaboutgoingoffthebeatenpathforyournextvacation?Ifso,youmightbeoneofthemanypeoplewhoa
Therearealsopeoplewhoobjecttofairytalesonthegroundsthattheyarenotobjectivelytrue,thatgiants,witches,two-hea
OldpeopleinThiengolysaytheycanrememberwhenthereweresomanytreesthatyoucouldn’tseethesky.Now,milesofreddish
随机试题
法人、个体工商户和个人合伙也享有人身权,在法律上表现为()
三焦主持诸气的生理功能的确切内涵是
门静脉系与腔静脉系之间最主要的交通支是()。
A.草绿色透明腹水B.黄色、浑浊、含胆汁性液体C.稀薄脓性略带臭气的液体D.抽出液为血性,胰淀粉酶高E.不凝固的鲜血胃十二指肠溃疡急性穿孔的临床特征是
单位工程施工中应遵循“先地下、后地上”、“( )”、“先安装主体设备,后安装配套设备”的程序。
潘某、苗某、任某、顾某四人合资兴办了豪俊进出口贸易有限责任公司(下称“豪俊公司”),注册资本为3000万元人民币,潘某占其中的50%。苗某占30%,任某占10%,顾某占10%。公司在成立后,召开了第一次股东会会议。对公司的管理和经营活动作出决定和规划。2
用收益法对房地产进行估价的基本步骤为()。
焦虑性神经症的主要临床特点不包括()。
社会主义政治文明建设的根本出发点和归宿是()
有如下程序:#include<iostream>usingnamespacestd;classMyClass{public:MyClass(intx):Val(x){}voidSet(i
最新回复
(
0
)