首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
By now, it should come as no surprise when scientists discover yet another case of experience changing the brain. From the senso
By now, it should come as no surprise when scientists discover yet another case of experience changing the brain. From the senso
admin
2011-04-11
35
问题
By now, it should come as no surprise when scientists discover yet another case of experience changing the brain. From the sensory information we absorb to the movements we make, our lives leave footprints on the bumps and fissures of our cortex, so much so that experiences can alter "hard-wired" brain structures. Through rehab, stroke patients can coax a region of the motor cortex on the opposite side of the damaged region to pinch-hit, restoring lost mobility; volunteers who are blindfolded for just five days can reprogram their visual cortex to process sound and touch.
Still, scientists have been surprised at how deeply culture—the language we speak, the values we absorb—shapes the brain, and are rethinking findings derived from studies of Westerners. To take one recent example, a region behind the forehead called the medial prefrontal cortex supposedly represents the self: it is active when we ("we" being the Americans in the study) think of our own identity and traits. But with Chinese volunteers, the results were strikingly different. The "me" circuit hummed not only when they thought whether a particular adjective described themselves, but also when they considered whether it described their mother. The Westerners showed no such overlap between self and mom. Depending whether one lives in a culture that views the self as autonomous and unique or as connected to and part of a larger whole, this neural circuit takes on quite different functions.
"Cultural neuroscience," as this new field is called, is about discovering such differences. Some of the findings, as with the "me/mom" circuit, buttress longstanding notions of cultural differences. For instance, it is a cultural cliche that Westerners focus on individual objects while East Asians pay attention to context and background (another manifestation of the individualism-collectivism split). Sure enough, when shown complex, busy scenes, Asian-Americans and non-Asian—Americans recruited different brain regions. The Asians showed more activity in areas that process figure-ground relations—holistic context—while the Americans showed more activity in regions that recognize objects.
Psychologist Nalini Ambady of Tufts found something similar when she and colleagues showed drawings of people in a submissive pose (head down, shoulders hunched) or a dominant one (arms crossed, face forward) to Japanese and Americans. The brain’s dopamine-fueled reward circuit became most active at the sight of the stance—dominant for Americans, submissive for Japanese—that each volunteer’s culture most values, they reported in 2009. This raises an obvious chicken-and-egg question.
Cultural neuroscience wouldn’t be making waves if it found neurobiological bases only for well-known cultural differences. It is also uncovering the unexpected. For instance, a 2006 study found that native Chinese speakers use a different region of the brain to do simple arithmetic (3 + 4) or decide which number is larger than native English speakers do, even though both use Arabic numerals. The Chinese use the circuits that process visual and spatial information and plan movements (the latter may be related to the use of the abacus). But English speakers use language circuits. It is as if the West conceives numbers as just words, but the East imbues them with symbolic, spatial freight. "One would think that neural processes involving basic mathematical computations are universal," says Ambady, but they "seem to be culture-specific. "
Not to be the skunk at this party, but I think it’s important to ask whether neuroscience reveals anything more than we already know from, say, anthropology. For instance, it’s well known that East Asian cultures prize the collective over the individual, and that Americans do the opposite.
Ambady thinks cultural neuroscience does advance understanding. Take the me/mom finding, which, she argues, "attests to the strength of the overlap between self and people close to you in collectivistic cultures and the separation in individualistic cultures. It is important to push the analysis to the level of the brain. " Especially when it shows how fundamental cultural differences are—so fundamental, perhaps, that "universal" notions such as human rights, democracy, and the like may be no such thing.
The passage most probably appears in a______.
选项
A、scientific report
B、biography
C、novel
D、newspaper
答案
A
解析
该文章最有可能出现在 。本题为推断题。根据原文的话题,我们可以推断出原文最有可能出现在科学报告中,不可能出现在传记、小说或报刊报道中。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/nAYO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
A、FishermenB、ScientistsC、TouristsD、SurfersD
Doyourememberallthoseyearswhenscientistsarguedthatsmokingwouldkillusbutthedoubtersinsistedthatwedidn’tknow
Whyshouldanyonebuythelatestvolumeintheever-expandingDictionaryofNationalBiography?Idonotmeanthatitisbad,as
Whyshouldanyonebuythelatestvolumeintheever-expandingDictionaryofNationalBiography?Idonotmeanthatitisbad,as
Inthesummerof999,LeifEriksonvoyagedtoNorwayandspentthefollowingwinterwithKingOlafTryggvason.Substantiallythe
Nowhereisthismoretruethanintheawardingofprizes.Becauseprizescarrytheapprovalofaninstitution,weexpectthemto
Nowhereisthismoretruethanintheawardingofprizes.Becauseprizescarrytheapprovalofaninstitution,weexpectthemt
TheidealseasonforplantingthecropinthemainfieldisJuly-AugustorNovember-December.Plantingisdoneonraisedbedsof
随机试题
A.药品使用的专属性B.需要用药的限时性C.用药后果的两重性D.质量控制的严格性E.药品生产过程的时间性
A.变质性炎症B.浆液性炎症C.增生性炎症D.化脓性炎症E.出血性炎症流行性脑脊髓膜炎属于()。
()不属于薪酬对企业的功能。
由于平均固定成本的作用,使得AC曲线最低点的出现()AVC曲线的最低点。
艺术批评
下列论述错误的是()。
除了吃川菜,张涛不吃其他菜肴。所有林村人都爱吃川菜。川菜的特色为麻辣香,其中有大量的干鲜辣椒、花椒、大蒜、姜、葱、香菜等调料。大部分吃川菜的人都喜好一边吃川菜,一边喝四川特有的盖碗茶。如果上述断定为真,则以下哪项一定为真?()
Whathappenedtotheauthor’scompanyfiveyearsago?
Whatdoesthewomanmean?
•Readthetextbelowaboutanaccountant.•Choosethebestwordtofilleachgap,fromA,B,CorD.•Foreachquestion193
最新回复
(
0
)