首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Whose Grave Is This Anyway? There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent f
Whose Grave Is This Anyway? There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent f
admin
2012-01-14
60
问题
Whose Grave Is This Anyway?
There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for thousands of years along the Nero River. In reality though, this silence has constantly been disturbed by a great variety of people. While considering their different motivations in doing so, we must examine whether disturbing the ancient tombs is justifiable or worthy of condemnation.
(A) [■] When Howard Carter and his party opened the tomb of the Egyptian king Tutankhamen in 1922, there was rejoicing around the world.
(B) [■] The tomb was largely intact and not seriously pillaged by ancient grave robbers, so it still contained the wonderful artifacts that had been buried with the young king more than three millennia earlier.
(C) [■] Over the next several years Carter and his team systematically photographed and catalogued the objects from the tomb, then transported them to the Cairo Museum.
(D) [■] There is a certain irony in this story that raises complex ethical questions. Why are Carter and his
party
not called grave robbers? Why are their actions in stripping the tomb acceptable—even praiseworthy—when similar behavior by common thieves would be deplored? No matter who opens a tomb and takes away its contents, that person is violating the intentions of
those
who sealed the tomb originally. No matter what the motivation, a human body that was meant to rest in peace for all time has been disturbed. Should this not make us feel uncomfortable? From the beginning, some were uneasy about the propriety of unearthing Tutankhamen’s remains. When Lord Carnarvon, Carter’s sponsor, died suddenly from a mosquito bite, and several others connected with the project experienced tragedies, rumors arose about the "curse of King Tut". But Carter himself died peacefully many years later, and the talk subsided.
Perhaps it is the passage of time that transforms grave robbing into archaeology.
Carter would no doubt have been outraged if, say, his grandmother’s coffin had been dug up to strip the body of its jewelry. But after three thousand years Tutankhamen has no living relatives to protest his disturbance. Perhaps it is a question of the words we use to describe such ancient finds. We speak of Tutankhamen’s "mummy", and mummy is a clean, historical-sounding word. Parents bring their children to museums to see the mummies and mummy cases. We can almost forget that a mummy is the embalmed body of a dead human being, pulled out of its coffin so that we can marvel at the coffin and sometimes the body itself. Or, perhaps the difference between grave robbing and archaeology lies in the motives of the perpetrators. Common thieves are motivated by greed, by their quest for money to be made by selling stolen objects. Carter and his team did not sell the treasures from Tutankhamen’s tomb but stored them safely in the Cairo Museum, where art lovers from around the world can see them.
They
were, in effect, making a glorious gift to the people of our century and centuries to come (while at the same time, one must point out, acquiring significant glory for themselves). The basic issue is a
clash
of cultural values. To the Egyptians, it was normal and correct to bury their finest artworks with the exalted dead. To us, the idea of all that beauty being locked away in the dark forever seems an appalling waste. We want to bring it into the light, to have it as part of our precious artistic
heritage
. Almost no one, having seen these magnificent treasures, would seriously propose they be put back in the tomb and sealed up. In the end, inevitably, our cultural values will prevail simply because we are still here and the ancient Egyptians are not. After three thousand years, Tutankhamen’s grave really isn’t his anymore. Whether right or wrong, it belongs to us.
The word they in Paragraph 7 refers to______.
选项
A、art lovers
B、the people
C、carter and his team
D、the public
答案
C
解析
本题为指代关系题,考查考生能否认定代词与篇章中其他词语的指代关系。题目问:文 章中的they指代的是什么?根据they所在的句子“Theyr were, in effect, making a glorious gift to the people-of our century and centuries to come(他们实际上为这个世纪以及未来世纪的人们奉献了丰厚的礼物)”。将财宝奉献给世人的人应该指的是Carter和他的队友,因为是他们将这些财宝从古墓中挖出来的,所以应该选C项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/nFyO777K
0
托福(TOEFL)
相关试题推荐
TacklingHungerinMsekeniATherearenotenoughclassroomsattheMsekeniprimaryschool,sohalfthelessonstakeplaceinth
Lookatthefollowingstatements(Questions4-10)andthelistofpeoplebelow.Matcheachstatementwiththecorrectperson,A-F.
AncientPeopleinSaharaOnOct.13,2000,PaulSereno,aprofessorfromtheUniversityofChicago,guidedateamofpalaeon
HowdesertsareformedA.Adesertreferstoabarrensectionofland,mainlyinaridandsemi-aridareas,wherethereisal
HowdesertsareformedA.Adesertreferstoabarrensectionofland,mainlyinaridandsemi-aridareas,wherethereisal
Howdidthestudentgettheuniversityprospectus?Whocanusethelanguagelab?
Completethenotesbelow.WriteONEWORDONLYforeachanswer.EngineeringforsustainabledevelopmentTheGreenhou
Whatdoesthepassagemainlydiscuss?Itcanbeinferredfromthepassagethatbrainsizeisassumedto
OnSeptember6,1996,civilrights(activist)RosaParks(wasawarded)thePresidentialMedalofFreedom,the(highest)honorth
随机试题
A、P波B、QRS波群C、T波D、PQ间期E、ST段心电图中代表心房去极化过程的是()
男性,38岁,酗酒后10小时出现中上腹疼痛,放射至两侧腰部,伴恶心、呕吐。体检:腹部有压痛,肌紧张及两侧腰腹部出现蓝一棕色斑,血压75/55mmHg,脉搏110次/分。对诊断困难者应进一步采取的检查是
借款人自主支付方式下,贷款人可以通过多种方式核查贷款支付情况,这些方式不包括()。
甲企业为国有工业企业,因经营管理不善,长期无法清偿到期债务。甲企业的债权人乙公司向法院申请宣告甲企业破产。乙公司提出破产申请时,应提交的材料有()。
解释测验结果的参照指标是()
下列关于党的重要思想,按提出时间先后顺序排列正确的是:①社会主义市场经济理论②“三个代表”重要思想③社会主义本质理论④构建社会主义和谐社会理念
民意调查结果。民众对媒体信任度百分之五十几,对政府只有百分之二十几,你怎么看?
12,36,80,150,()
取款机:银行职员
不合法的C语言字符常量是()。
最新回复
(
0
)