首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Whose Grave Is This Anyway? There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent f
Whose Grave Is This Anyway? There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent f
admin
2012-01-14
64
问题
Whose Grave Is This Anyway?
There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for thousands of years along the Nero River. In reality though, this silence has constantly been disturbed by a great variety of people. While considering their different motivations in doing so, we must examine whether disturbing the ancient tombs is justifiable or worthy of condemnation.
(A) [■] When Howard Carter and his party opened the tomb of the Egyptian king Tutankhamen in 1922, there was rejoicing around the world.
(B) [■] The tomb was largely intact and not seriously pillaged by ancient grave robbers, so it still contained the wonderful artifacts that had been buried with the young king more than three millennia earlier.
(C) [■] Over the next several years Carter and his team systematically photographed and catalogued the objects from the tomb, then transported them to the Cairo Museum.
(D) [■] There is a certain irony in this story that raises complex ethical questions. Why are Carter and his
party
not called grave robbers? Why are their actions in stripping the tomb acceptable—even praiseworthy—when similar behavior by common thieves would be deplored? No matter who opens a tomb and takes away its contents, that person is violating the intentions of
those
who sealed the tomb originally. No matter what the motivation, a human body that was meant to rest in peace for all time has been disturbed. Should this not make us feel uncomfortable? From the beginning, some were uneasy about the propriety of unearthing Tutankhamen’s remains. When Lord Carnarvon, Carter’s sponsor, died suddenly from a mosquito bite, and several others connected with the project experienced tragedies, rumors arose about the "curse of King Tut". But Carter himself died peacefully many years later, and the talk subsided.
Perhaps it is the passage of time that transforms grave robbing into archaeology.
Carter would no doubt have been outraged if, say, his grandmother’s coffin had been dug up to strip the body of its jewelry. But after three thousand years Tutankhamen has no living relatives to protest his disturbance. Perhaps it is a question of the words we use to describe such ancient finds. We speak of Tutankhamen’s "mummy", and mummy is a clean, historical-sounding word. Parents bring their children to museums to see the mummies and mummy cases. We can almost forget that a mummy is the embalmed body of a dead human being, pulled out of its coffin so that we can marvel at the coffin and sometimes the body itself. Or, perhaps the difference between grave robbing and archaeology lies in the motives of the perpetrators. Common thieves are motivated by greed, by their quest for money to be made by selling stolen objects. Carter and his team did not sell the treasures from Tutankhamen’s tomb but stored them safely in the Cairo Museum, where art lovers from around the world can see them.
They
were, in effect, making a glorious gift to the people of our century and centuries to come (while at the same time, one must point out, acquiring significant glory for themselves). The basic issue is a
clash
of cultural values. To the Egyptians, it was normal and correct to bury their finest artworks with the exalted dead. To us, the idea of all that beauty being locked away in the dark forever seems an appalling waste. We want to bring it into the light, to have it as part of our precious artistic
heritage
. Almost no one, having seen these magnificent treasures, would seriously propose they be put back in the tomb and sealed up. In the end, inevitably, our cultural values will prevail simply because we are still here and the ancient Egyptians are not. After three thousand years, Tutankhamen’s grave really isn’t his anymore. Whether right or wrong, it belongs to us.
The word they in Paragraph 7 refers to______.
选项
A、art lovers
B、the people
C、carter and his team
D、the public
答案
C
解析
本题为指代关系题,考查考生能否认定代词与篇章中其他词语的指代关系。题目问:文 章中的they指代的是什么?根据they所在的句子“Theyr were, in effect, making a glorious gift to the people-of our century and centuries to come(他们实际上为这个世纪以及未来世纪的人们奉献了丰厚的礼物)”。将财宝奉献给世人的人应该指的是Carter和他的队友,因为是他们将这些财宝从古墓中挖出来的,所以应该选C项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/nFyO777K
0
托福(TOEFL)
相关试题推荐
Choosethecorrectletter,A,B,CorD.Writethecorrectletterinboxes36-40onyouranswersheet.Whatisdiscussedinthe
AccordingtoMrSingh,onwhichthingdomanypeoplemakesuperficialobservations?AccordingtoMrSingh,whatareyoungIndia
WhatisthetitleoftheseriesofpresentationsthatDavidPricewillmake?【17】______
Atthestartofthetutorial,thetutoremphasisestheimportanceofAnimportantpartofteamworkishavingtrustinyour
Arestaurantmay______foritsdeliveryservice.ThespeakerdescribestheatmosphereatBritishpubsas______.
Choosethecorrectletter,A,BorC.Therestaurantisfamousfor
Choosethecorrectletter,A,BorC.Alisathinksthatfamoussuccessfulpeople
Whatdoesthepassagemainlydiscuss?Itcanbeinferredfromthepassagethatsoilcomposedofsilica
Thewaterof(the)Atlantic,Pacific,andIndianOceans(makeup)70.8percent(to)theEarth’s(surface).
随机试题
下列何者属于非质子性溶剂
在冶炼炉(高炉、平炉、电炉)、电焊、气焊、氩弧焊和等离子焊接场所工作容易受到()。
根据不同的功能划分,基金公司的五大业务部门不包括()。
金融互换是通过()进行的场外交易。
“十月革命一声炮响,给中国送来了马克思列宁主义”,五四运动后,马克思列宁主义得到广泛传播。在中国颂扬俄国革命的第一人是()
从1988年到2004年,我国现行宪法先后进行了四次修正。其中“将乡镇人大的任期,由3年改为5年”是在()。
①第一本防水平装书还将拥有强大的防伪功能 ②澳大利亚的银行现在已经使用该项技术来延长纸币的使用寿命,同时减少伪造的风险③英国出版商近日透露,世界上第一本防水平装书有望明年夏天上架销售④书的外面还有一层防撕毁的坚韧的聚合物涂层,整本书
一、注意事项1.申论考试与传统的作文考试不同。是分析驾驭材料的能力与表达能力并重的考试。2.仔细阅读给定的资料,按照后面提出的“作答要求”依次作答在答题纸指定位置。3.答题时请认准题号,避免答错位置影响考试成绩。4.
(A)5(B)10(C)15(D)25(E)Itcannotbedeterminedfromtheinformationgiven.
WhendoingbusinessintheArabworld,donotbesurprisedifyourmeetingisinterruptedseveraltimesbypeoplewhocomeinto
最新回复
(
0
)