2. 外语
  3. Read the article below about mining mergers and the questions on the opposite page. For each question(13-18), mark one lette

Read the article below about mining mergers and the questions on the opposite page. For each question(13-18), mark one lette

admin2015-04-23  48
问题     Read the article below about mining mergers and the questions on the opposite page.
    For each question(13-18), mark one letter(A, B, C or D)on your Answer Sheet.
                Three middling mining firms bet on scale and scarcity
    In May prices for copper, nickel and other metals rose to record levels, although they have since fallen a bit. Now three mining firms are proposing the most expensive merger in the industry’s history. The $40 billion deal, in which an American company, Phelps Dodge, plans to take over two Canadian ones, Inco and Falconbridge, would create the world’s biggest producer of nickel, the number two in copper, and the fifth-ranked mining firm overall. The records may not stop there: two other mining firms, Xstrata and Teck Cominco, had previously bid for Falconbridge and Inco respectively, and could make further offers.
    Soaring commodities prices have left mining firms flush with cash and keen to expand. One way would be to search for more metal in the ground, instead of on the stockmarket. But organic growth is expensive at the moment: as firms rush to increase their output to take advantage of high prices, every conceivable input, from engineers to mining trucks’huge tyres, is in desperately short supply. Developing new mines is also slow. Mining executives worry that projects that get the go-ahead when prices are high will not look so attractive when the next recession comes.
    That could be true of the proposed merger too. Phelps Dodge offered a premium of 23% over the price of Inco’s shares and 12% over Falconbridge’s. Those shares, in turn, have been rising for several years along with the firms’ wares— nickel, for the most part, at Inco, and nickel and copper at Falconbridge.
    The bosses of the firms insist that the mark-up is justified, for several reasons. For one thing, they reckon they can squeeze savings of $900m a year out of the combined entity by 2008, by sharing equipment and personnel among adjacent mines, for example, and pooling their marketing staff. More importantly, they argue that the size and diversity of the new company will make it less vulnerable to mining’s painful cycles, and so more attractive to investors.
    The biggest and most diversified mining companies, such as BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto, do boast higher share valuations. They produce everything from aluminium to zircon, and so are less susceptible to fluctuations in the price of any particular metal. By the same logic, the more mines a firm is running or developing, and the more countries it operates in, the less risk each individual project poses to profits. The merged trio will certainly have a broader geographical spread, with mines in five continents. But its main projects, in stable places like the United States, Canada and Chile, never seemed that risky in the first place. Furthermore, despite having sidelines in cobalt and molybdenum, the new firm’s fortunes will depend chiefly on the price of copper and nickel—two of most volatile metals in recent years.
    Some analysts mutter that Phelps Dodge embarked on the merger chiefly to save itself from being taken over. Investors seem to share their doubts: Phelps Dodge’s shares fell by 8% after it announced the deal, despite a simultaneous pledge to spend $5 billion on a share buy-back scheme once the merger is concluded.
    On the other hand, the price of nickel and copper jumped on the news. Traders seem to have assumed that the companies would have contemplated such an expensive deal only if they thought that metals would remain in short supply for some time. The more money that mining firms spend buying one another, rather than exploring for and developing new mines, the likelier that is.
In the author’s opinion, the price of the firm’s metals rises because
选项 A、companies offer an additional amount of money to buy others’ shares.
B、wares are increasing along with the merger.
C、Nickel and copper makes up the most part of the firm.
D、shares of the companies are increasing.
答案A
解析 题目意为：“作者认为，公司金属价格上涨的原因是……”，原文第三段指出，那同样适用于拟议中的合并(指第二段所说，当金属价格降下来时，人们将不再关注那些已获许可的项目)，Phelps Dodge在Inco公司股价基础上加价23％，在Falconbridge公司股价基础上加价12％。反过来，那些股票随着公司货物的价格这几年一直在上涨，在Inco公司，绝大部分货物是镍，在Falconbridge公司则是镍和铜。因此，金属价格上涨的原因是公司在股票原有价格基础上加价，这与A项内容相吻合。其中，第三段中的PhelpsDodge offend a premium of 23％over the price of Inco’s shares and 12％overFalconbridge’s．Those shares，in turn，have been rising for several years along withthe firms’wares…为信息关键句。文中的premium对应于题中的an additional amountof money。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/nqoO777K
本试题收录于： BEC中级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0

BEC中级阅读

BEC商务英语

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)