Bernie Sanders, an independent senator from Vermont, put a plan to make higher education at public universities free at the cent

admin2022-11-01  36

问题     Bernie Sanders, an independent senator from Vermont, put a plan to make higher education at public universities free at the centre of his upstart campaign for the presidency in 2015. The idea seemed radical, even gimmicky. Now some democrats oppose the notion, for example Pete Buttigieg, the mayor of South Bend, and their arguments still pack a punch. Why indeed should taxpayers’ money be spent on the children of the rich rather than more generous financial aid for the poor?
    Across much of the rich world, a public-university education is free or nearly free, apart from the cost of books and living expenses. But those in America and Britain pay tuition fees which are high and growing higher. Places like America and Britain pass some of this increase on to students in the form of higher fees, with the understanding that poorer students will receive financial aid while richer ones will bear the full tuition bill.
    To many politicians in these places, this seems just. Unlike primary or secondary education, university is a minority pursuit in most advanced economies. Only about 45% of adults aged 25 to 34 have some post-secondary education. Those people tend to come from richer families. A universal programme that mostly benefits a well-off not-quite-half of the country would seem a strange aspiration for egalitarian-minded politicians. Better to target aid at those from poorer families.
    However, supporters of free university marshal a number of practical arguments. University attendees are more likely to come from wealthier families precisely because university is not free. Several analyses of the introduction of tuition fees in Britain found a negative effect on university attendance. A report produced by the Institute for Fiscal Studies estimated that an increase of £1,000 ($1,243) in tuition fees is associated with a decline of 3.9 percentage points in the rate at which recent school-leavers choose to go on to university. Work by Thomas Kane of Harvard University found a response of similar magnitude in America. And research by Susan Dynarski of the University of Michigan and Judith Scott-Clayton of Columbia University concludes that both attendance and completion rates are higher when education is more affordable.
    But the most powerful arguments for free university are about values rather than economic efficiency. There are broad social benefits to a well-educated citizenry, because new ideas allow society as a whole to prosper. Amid constant technological change, a standing offer of free higher education may represent an important component of the social safety-net. Universality reinforces the idea that free education is not a makeshift form of redistribution, but part of a system of collective insurance forming an egalitarian society.
Which of the following would be the best title for the text?

选项 A、Academic Pursuit Regardless of Tuition
B、Assistance for Children of the Poor
C、A Debate About the Cost of Higher Education
D、University Attendance Affected by Finances

答案 C

解析 本文通过美国民主党反对公立大学教育免费引出主题,然后列举美国和英国大学收取学费的例外做法引出下文对于公立高等教育收费与否的辩论:许多政客认为大学收取学费是公平的,他们认为大学是少数人的追求;而另一些教育人士指出收取学费对于大学入学率和毕业率会产生一些负面影响。作者在文章最后提出自己的观点,认为高等教育免费是有利的,可以为社会带来广泛利益,使整个社会繁荣、稳定和公平,由此可知,全文是针对高等教育是否收费的一个辩论,故选项[C]为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/o0MD777K
0

最新回复(0)