首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
admin
2013-06-26
95
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism . The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s famous saying that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation. "
Which all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology. The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’ s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr Bartels and Dr Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights" , "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy , and a person’ s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr Bartels and Dr Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas (push the fat guy off the bridge) and personalities that were psychopathic, or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve—inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone ’ s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr Bartels and Dr Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic misanthropes ? Apparently, yes.
It can be inferred from the passage that______.
选项
A、in real life, only around 10% of people would act in a utilitarian way.
B、a utilitarian is necessarily an unhappy and psychopathic person.
C、the process of legislation usually involves choices in a dilemma.
D、those engaging in legal profession are usually utilitarians.
答案
C
解析
[A]错误,原文只是提到了在电车案件中,按照以往的研究,通常有大约10%的人会选择功利主义解决方案,但是我们不能就此判断在现实生活中,有大约10%的人会按照功利主义原则行事。[B]错误,功利主义和精神疾病之间有一定的联系,但这种联系不是必然的。[C]正确,文章最后一段明确指出,功利主义在制定法律过程中非常重要,因为它为人们在面临两难抉择时提供了一定的判断依据。[D]错误,文中只是提到功利主义和法律之间有不可分割的联系,法律制定者往往为了权衡各方利益,而保证大多数人的幸福。但是不能笼统地认为从事法律职业的人都是功利主义者。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/odd4777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
GregFocker,playedbyBenStiller,representsagenerationofAmericankids(1)_____inthe1980sonthephilosophythatanyac
GregFocker,playedbyBenStiller,representsagenerationofAmericankids(1)_____inthe1980sonthephilosophythatanyac
Acollegestudentbecomessocompulsiveaboutcleaninghisdormroomthathisgradesbegintoslip.AnexecutivelivinginNewY
Inanidealworld,thenation’seliteschoolswouldenrollthemostqualifiedstudents.Butthat’snothowit(1)_____.Applicant
Inanidealworld,thenation’seliteschoolswouldenrollthemostqualifiedstudents.Butthat’snothowit(1)_____.Applicant
Accordingtothetext,themaindifferencebetweenamultinationalcorporationandasmallbusinessliesinWemayconcludefro
escapefrom(Para.1)canbesubstitutedforWhyisitdifficulttodetectneutrinos?
Illiteracymaybeconsideredmoreasanabstractconceptthanacondition.WhenafamousEnglishwriterusedthe(1)_____overt
"TheimpulsetoexcessamongyoungBritonsremainsaspowerfulasever,buttheforcethatusedtokeeptheimpulseincheckhas
"TheimpulsetoexcessamongyoungBritonsremainsaspowerfulasever,buttheforcethatusedtokeeptheimpulseincheckhas
随机试题
对于零级反应,增加反应物的浓度可提高化学反应速率。()
观察某种疫苗的预防效果,若于第一季度初接种了400人,第二季度初接种了300人,第三季度初接种了100人,第四季度初接种了200人。年终发现这1000人中发病者20人。计算发病率的分母应该是
关于外墙防潮层设置说法正确的有( )。
关于《会计法》的表述,不正确的是()。
甲建筑公司2008年承包了一项价值300万元的项目,并为此项目投保了工程保险。2008年9月由于技术人员疏忽,造成了价值30万元的项目损失。该建筑公司10月向保险公司要求赔偿,则保险公司( )。
基金投资所涉及的证券交易所遇法定节假日或因其他原因暂停营业时,基金不得暂停估值。()
自由连锁的主体是总部,总部与各分店的关系表现为()。
2017年7月1日,人民法院裁定受理了甲公司的破产申请。现查明,甲公司所占有的一台精密仪器是乙公司出租给甲公司的。根据企业破产法律制度的规定,关于乙公司的取回权,下列表述中,错误的有()。
小学生常常出现好心办坏事的现象,其原因主要是()。
用法律管道德问题,旨在利用法律对不道德行为的约束力,即通过规定人们该做什么、不该做什么来惩恶扬善。但是道德问题无法量化,这就令道德立法常常缺乏可操作性。比如,“不让座”的是全车的有座之人,还是与老弱病残孕距离最近的个别人?“常回家看看”的频率是什么,看的程
最新回复
(
0
)