首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Just how much does the Constitution protect your digital data? The Supreme Court will now consider whether police can search the
Just how much does the Constitution protect your digital data? The Supreme Court will now consider whether police can search the
admin
2016-01-05
59
问题
Just how much does the Constitution protect your digital data? The Supreme Court will now consider whether police can search the contents of a mobile phone without a warrant if the phone is on or around a person during an arrest.
California has asked the justices to refrain from a sweeping ruling, particularly one that upsets the old assumptions that authorities may search through the possessions of suspects at the time of their arrest. It is hard, the state argues, for judges to assess the implications of new and rapidly changing technologies.
The court would be recklessly modest if it followed California’s advice. Enough of the implications are discernable, even obvious, so that the justice can and should provide updated guidelines to police, lawyers and defendants.
They should start by discarding California’s lame argument that exploring the contents of a smartphone—a vast storehouse of digital information—is similar to, say, going through a suspect’ s purse. The court has ruled that police don’t violate the Fourth Amendment when they go through the wallet or pocketbook of an arrestee without a warrant. But exploring one’ s smartphone is more like entering his or her home. A smartphone may contain an arrestee’ s reading history, financial history, medical history and comprehensive records of recent correspondence. The development of "cloud computing", meanwhile, has made that exploration so much the easier.
Americans should take steps to protect their digital privacy. But keeping sensitive information on these devices is increasingly a requirement of normal life. Citizens still have a right to expect private documents to remain private and protected by the Constitution’s prohibition on unreasonable searches.
As so often is the case, stating that principle doesn’t ease the challenge of line-drawing. In many cases, it would not be overly burdensome for authorities to obtain a warrant to search through phone contents. They could still invalidate Fourth Amendment protections when facing severe, urgent circumstances, and they could take reasonable measures to ensure that phone data are not erased or altered while waiting for a warrant. The court, though, may want to allow room for police to cite situations where they are entitled to more freedom.
But the justices should not swallow California’s argument whole. New, disruptive technology sometimes demands novel applications of the Constitution’s protections. Orin Kerr, a law professor, compares the explosion and accessibility of digital information in the 21st century with the establishment of automobile use as a virtual necessity of life in the 20th: The justices had to specify novel rules for the new personal domain of the passenger car then; they must sort out how the Fourth Amendment applies to digital information now.
In Paragraphs 5 and 6, the author shows his concern that
选项
A、principles are hard to be clearly expressed.
B、the court is giving police less room for action.
C、phones are used to store sensitive information.
D、citizens’ privacy is not effectively protected.
答案
D
解析
推断题。根据题干关键词Paragraph 5 and 6定位到第五段和第六段。第五段认为应采取措施保护数据隐私,第六段继续陈述原则的不恰当之处,说明作者认为现在公民的隐私没有得到有效保护.故D项符合题意。A项“原则很难清晰表达”和C项“手机被用来存储敏感信息”不是作者想要表达的核心观点。B项“法庭给予警察的行动空间更少了”与原文相反,原文是allow room for police.即给予警察空间。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/pjsZ777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
GoingonlineisafavoritepastimeformillionsofAmericanchildren.Almost10million(14percent)ofAmerica’s69millionchild
Someoftoday’smostcutting-edgetechnologyisnowbeingusedtohelpstudentswithspecialneeds.Nolongerjusttheprovince
Inthedaysandweeksafter9/11anumberofwritersaskedwhatthefutureoffictioncouldbeaftersucharupture.Thecomment
Formanyyears,collegesanduniversitiesacrosstheUnitedStateshavesoughttoincreasethenumbersofAfricanAmerican,Hisp
Notwoeconomiccrisesareidentical.Butthesamequestionsrecur.Howdidwegetintothismess?Howcanwegetoutofit?How
Improvinginformationtechnologyiscrucialtohelpingthetransportationindustrystrengthensystemscriticaltotheglobaleco
Thedevil,astheoldsayinggoes,isinthedetails.Or,inthecaseofthenewEstonianlawsettingupanationalgeneticdata
Inthecourseofalongweekendin1991,thePhilippines’MountPinatubovolcanoinjectedenoughsulfurdioxideintothestratos
Expertshavelongknownthatchildrenimitatemanyofthedeeds—goodandbad—thattheyseeontelevision.Butithasrarelybeen
Themoneyisthere.Sowhyisitnotbeingspent?Thatisthebigpuzzleabouttherichworld’seffortstoimprovehealthinpoo
随机试题
奎宁的不良反应包括
冠状动脉的分支不包括
关于栓剂基质聚乙二醇的叙述,错误的是
柴胡疏肝散适合治疗痞满的证型是
某男,58岁,因下肢静脉曲张行高位结扎及剥脱术后4小时,因站立排尿,小腿部伤口处突然出血不止。紧急处理方法是
(2013年)好氧生物滤池(不同高度),微生物分布不同的原因是()。
微博在中国的惊人繁荣让很多人似乎感到了某种互联网民主而充满乐观,但就好像一片水域蓝藻特别繁盛,并不是这里水质________的表示,微博的商业成功,也应该引起我们对中国社会结构的________和对当下舆论环境的________。填入画横线部分最恰当的一项
一条均匀链条挂在一个无摩擦的钉子上,链条长18m,运动开始时链条一边下垂8m,另一边下垂10m,问整个链条滑过钉子需要多长时间?
幂级数x2n-1的收敛半径R=___________.
"Nothingraisesmorefearinarepressivegovernmentthanchallengestothecontrolofinformation.Andnothingismoreimportan
最新回复
(
0
)