首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Let’s Not Hide Health Costs We are awash in health-care proposals. President Bush has one. So does California Gov. Arnold Sch
Let’s Not Hide Health Costs We are awash in health-care proposals. President Bush has one. So does California Gov. Arnold Sch
admin
2020-05-01
82
问题
Let’s Not Hide Health Costs
We are awash in health-care proposals. President Bush has one. So does California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden has a plan, as does a coalition led by Families USA (a liberal advocacy group) and America’s Health Insurance Plans (a trade group). To some extent, all these plans and others aim to provide insurance to the estimated 47 million Americans who lack it—a situation widely deplored as a national disgrace. But the real significance of all these proposals, I submit, lies elsewhere.
For decades, Americans have treated health care as if it exists in a separate economic and political world: when people need care, they should get it; costs should remain out of sight. About 60 percent of Americans receive insurance through their employers; to most workers, the full costs are unknown. The 65-and-older population and many poor people receive government insurance. Except for modest Medicare premiums and payroll taxes, costs are largely buried in federal and state budgets.
It is this segregation of health care from everything else that is now crumbling— and the various health proposals are just one sign. We see others all the time. For example, even with employer-provided insurance, workers’ monthly premiums (which cover only part of the costs) have skyrocketed. From 1999 to 2006, they doubled from $129 to $248.
Look at Massachusetts. Last year the then Gov. Mitt Romney made headlines by signing legislation to cover all the state’s uninsured. The law required that everyone with incomes three times the federal poverty line buy "affordable" insurance (people with incomes below that threshold would be subsidized on a sliding scale). Romney suggested annual premiums for a single worker might total $2,400. But when insurance companies recently provided real estimates, the cost was much higher: $4,560. Is it a sensible policy to force workers with a $30,000 income—about triple the poverty line— to spend nearly a sixth of their budget on health insurance, as opposed to food, rent or transportation? Good question.
The hard questions won’t sit still, because health care (now a sixth of the economy, up from an 11th in 1980) is too big to be hidden. Myths abound. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the doubling of premiums for employer-provided coverage doesn’t mean companies shifted a greater share of costs to workers. In both 1999 and 2006, premiums covered 27 percent of costs, says Paul Fronstin of the Employee Benefit Research Institute. It’s simply the rapid rise in total health spending that’s depressed workers’ take-home pay.
One myth about the uninsured is that, because they’re heavy users of emergency-room services, providing them with insurance (and regular care) would actually lower their costs. This may be true for some—but not most. The trouble is that the uninsured don’t really use emergency rooms heavily. A study on the journal Health Affairs finds that their use is similar to that of people with private insurance—and half that of people with Medicaid. The
upshot
is that extending insurance to all the uninsured would be costly, because they would get more and (presumably) better care. John Sheils of the Lewin Group estimates the annual cost of their care would rise 75 percent to $145 billion.
Our health-care system will inevitably combine government regulation and private enterprise. But what should the mix be? Which patients, providers and technologies should be subsidized and why? How important is health care compared with other public and private goals? Will an expanding health-care sector spur the economy—or, through high taxe and insurance premiums, retard it? We have refused to have this debate for obvious reasons. A friend of mine recently had a near-death experience; he survived only because he had superb medical care. Debating health care makes us queasy, because it pits moral imperatives (including the right to live) against coldhearted economics.
I don’t intend to examine—at least now—all the new proposals. Some would do better at some goals (say, protecting the poor) than at others (say, controlling costs). But the Bush proposal does have one huge virtue: it exposes health-care costs to the broad public. By not taxing employer-paid insurance, the government now provides a huge invisible subsidy to workers. Bush wouldn’t end the subsidy, but by modifying it with specific deductions for insurance ($15,000 for families, $7,500 for singles), he would force most workers to see the costs. By contrast, some other proposals disguise their costs. Schwarzenegger’s plan shifts costs to the federal government, doctors and hospitals. It’s clever, but it perpetuates the illusion that health care is cheap)—or even free.
However our health system evolves—with more government control or more market influence—Americans need to come to a more realistic understanding of its limits. Underestimating its costs and exaggerating its benefits guarantees disappointment. If the present outpouring of proposals signals a start of our needed debate, then it is long overdue.
According to the passage, a big difference between the Bush proposal and the Schwarzenegger proposal is that .
选项
A、the latter hides the health-care costs
B、the former hides the health-care costs
C、the latter does better at controlling costs
D、the former does better at controlling costs
答案
A
解析
由第八段可知,布什提议与施瓦辛格提议的一个重要区别是,前者向人们揭示了健康的费用,使人们对该费用有一个清楚的认识,而后者虽然将费用转给了联邦政府、医生或医院,但却使人们对卫生保健产生幻想,认为其费用是低廉的。故A是正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/pubK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
TeachingMethodsforEffectiveCommunicationI.Writeimportantpointson【T1】______【T1】______—theorganizationofideas—tec
StructureoftheCanadianGovernmentI.Introduction—Canada’ssystemofgovernmentwasbasedontheBritishsystemofparliam
StructureoftheCanadianGovernmentI.Introduction—Canada’ssystemofgovernmentwasbasedontheBritishsystemofparliam
A、Itiseasytotalkaboutmoneyproblembeforemarriage.B、Itiswisetoshowyourentirepropertystatusbeforemarriage.C、Mo
ReadingTipsI.Three【T1】______phasesofreading【T1】______—beforereading—duringreading—afterreadingⅡ.Pre-readingt
A、ByshiftingAmericans’consciousnesstospiritualPuritanism.B、BychangingAmericans’consciousnesstosecularrationalism.C
PASSAGEONETowhichdirectiondothethornsextendtheirbranchesaccordingtoPara.2?
Althoughthefirstyearisreallyimportantforlanguagedevelopmentinchildren,majorlearningcontinuesthroughoutachild’s
A、Itisreconcilable.B、Itiscontradictory.C、Ithastobetreatedcarefully.D、Itisadifficulttohandle.A对话中,女士问Mr.Phelps是
Thefactthattheworld’scitiesaregettingmoreandmorecrowdedisawell-documenteddemographicfact.CitiessuchasTokyo
随机试题
上海甲公司与深圳乙公司签订了一份书面合同,甲公司签字、盖章后邮寄给乙公司签字、盖章。则该合同成立的时间是()。
一6个月婴儿,喂面条后发生腹泻2d,稀水样便5~6次/d,量中等,偶吐奶,尿量略减少,前囟及眼窝稍凹陷。下列哪项措施不妥
()提供的信息是市场信息、营销信息。
商业银行由于资金周转的需要,以未到期的合格票据再向中央银行贴现时所适用的利率是()。
实习生小赵发现,在教学活动中,教师总是请那几个幼儿发言,有些幼儿茫然端坐,从不举手,她疑惑地询问一个不举手的幼儿,得到的回答是:“反正举了手老师也不会叫我”。请从学前教育原则和教育公平的视角论述上述现象。
人民警察首要的政治品质是( )。
发展社会主义民主政治,最根本的就是实现政治民主和人的自由。()
要成巨富,还须“争时”,放远眼光,走在别人前面;当然.仅有眼光是不够的,作为一个一流的货殖家.更要像刁问那样具备“智”、“勇”、“仁”、“强”四种品德。这是白圭的理论,而为刁间所充分实践。这段话主要强调的是()。
从下列两题中任选一题作答,如果两题都答,只按第Ⅰ道的成绩计入总分。有一个健康教育工作者正在设计一项研究,其目的是对六所城市中学生的饮食习惯进行调查。饮食习惯涉及这样的一些因素,如学生吃喝什么东西、什么时候进餐等。(1)假设使用访谈法对随机抽取的学生
WhyisJanesohappy?Becauseshewill______tomorrow.
最新回复
(
0
)