首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Older Americans are less healthy than their English counterparts, but they live as long as or even longer than their English pee
Older Americans are less healthy than their English counterparts, but they live as long as or even longer than their English pee
admin
2016-10-20
65
问题
Older Americans are less healthy than their English counterparts, but they live as long as or even longer than their English peers, according to a new study by researchers from the RAND Corporation and the Institute for Fiscal Studies in London. Researchers found that while Americans aged 55 to 64 have higher rates of chronic diseases than their peers in England; they died at about the same rate. And Americans age 65 and older—while still sicker than their English peers—had a lower death rate than similar people in England, according to findings published in the journal Demography.
The paper was co-authored by James Banks and Alastair Muriel of the Institute for Fiscal Studies and James P. Smith, distinguished chair in labor markets and demographic studies at RAND. "If you get sick at older ages, you will die sooner in England than in the United States," Smith said. "It appears that at least in terms of survival at older ages with chronic disease, the medical system in the United States may be better than the system in England. "
In the new study, researchers examined the prevalence of illness among those 55 to 64 and 70 to 80. They also looked for the first time at the onset of new illnesses in those age groups in the United States and England during the years spanning 2005 to 2009. Finally, researchers examined trends in death rates in each country.
The findings showed that both disease prevalence and the onset of new disease were higher among Americans for the illnesses studied—diabetes, high-blood pressure, heart disease, heart attack, stroke, chronic lung diseases and cancer. Researchers found that the higher prevalence of illness among Americans compared to the English that they previously found for those aged 55 to 64 was also apparent for those in their 70s. Diabetes rates were almost twice as high in the United States as in England (17.2 percent versus 10.4 percent) and cancer prevalence was more than twice as high in the United States (17.9 percent compared to 7.8 percent) for people in their 70s.
In spite of both higher prevalence and incidence of disease in America, death rates among Americans were about the same in the younger ages in this period of life and actually lower at older ages compared to the English. Researchers say there are two possible explanations why death rates are higher for English after age 65 as compared to Americans. One is that the illnesses studied result in higher mortality in England than in the United States. The second is that the English are diagnosed at a later stage in the disease process than Americans. "Both of these explanations imply that there is higher-quality medical care in the United States than in England, at least in the sense that these chronic illnesses are less likely to cause death among people living in the United States," Smith said.
"The United States’ health problem is not fundamentally a health care or insurance problem, at least at older ages," Banks said. "It is a problem of excess illness and the solution to that problem may lie outside the health care delivery system. The solution may be to alter lifestyles or other behaviors. " The study also investigated the relationship between the financial resources of individuals in both countries and how soon they would die in the future.
While poorer people are more likely to die sooner than their more well-off counterparts, researchers say their finding supports the view that the primary pathway between health and wealth is that poor health leads to a depletion of household wealth, rather than being poor causes one’s health to decline. Researchers found that the substantial changes in wealth that occurred in the years 1992 and 2002 in the United States through increases in stock prices and housing prices did not alter the probability of subsequent death.
According to the findings of the study, ______.
选项
A、life expectancy has little to do with the amount of wealth
B、poor health exhausts financial resources
C、poverty leads to poor health.
D、the more wealth one possesses, the longer he can expect to live
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/qOcO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Inanycase,youshouldkeepyourshirt,becausewhenGodclosesadoor,somewhereheopensawindow.
Orperhapshelooksatarun-downmountainhouseand,rememberingRousseauratherthanseeingwithhiseyes,decidesthat"those
Ifyouarenottemperateinyoureatinginspring,youmaygainexcessiveweightandlookobeseinsummer.
Thesecondlittlepigwasunlucky.Hebuilthishousefromsticks.Itwasblownawaybyahuffing,puffingwolf,whichpromptly
Itwasaone-linechatreplyfromanAncestryDNAcustomer-servicerepthatrippedCatherineSt.Clair’slife.At57,shewasher
TidinessTidinessmeanskeepingthingsoutofsightandyetavailablewhenwanted.Itimpliesthatthereisa【C1】________for
TidinessTidinessmeanskeepingthingsoutofsightandyetavailablewhenwanted.Itimpliesthatthereisa【C1】________for
AlphaZeroseemstoexpressinsight.Itplayslikenocomputereverhas,intuitivelyandbeautifully,witharomantic,attacking
A、Bytakingnotes.B、Byrememberingwhatwassaid.C、Bygettinguptoshutthedoor.D、Byaskingquestions.D
大学教师经常放弃他们每周部分业余时间,走访给当地居民讲课,内容涵盖健康、医疗、金融投资。关键词汇:freetime:业余时间,这个句子要注意一些细节翻译,比如说是每周,一部分的业余时间。
随机试题
Largecompaniesneedawaytoreachthesavingsofthepublicatlarge.Thesameproblem,onasmallerscale,facesalmostevery
Thisboxis______thatone.
A.饭前服B.饭后服C.服后多饮水D.不宜立即饮水E.用吸管服用助消化药
下列选项是收入总额中不征税收入的有( )。
“进口口岸”栏应填:“标记唛码及备注”栏应填:
张某和某服装厂签订了一份服装买卖合同,约定:张某为买方,预先支付全部货款;服装厂为卖方,收到货款后10天内发货。合同订立后,张某支付了全部货款。付款后第二日,张某因与李某存在债务纠纷逃到外地避债,下落不明,致使服装厂无法向其按时交货。按照法律规定,服装厂可
调查显示,59.4%的公众感觉当前社会“逆淘汰”现象普遍,其中18.8%的人觉得“非常多”。所谓“逆淘汰”,简言之,即指坏的淘汰好的,劣质的淘汰优质的,平庸的淘汰杰出的等现象。根据上述定义,下列属于逆淘汰现象的是()。
所有有效的管理者都关心雇员的福利,所有关心雇员福利的管理者都慷慨地允许雇员有个人支配的时间。因此,所有不允许雇员有个人支配时间的管理者不是有效的管理者。如果上述论证有效的话,下列哪句必须是真实的?
关于“最近发展区”这一理论的相关叙述正确的是()
有以下程序:#include<stdio.h>voidfun(inta,intb){intt;t=a;a=b;b=t;}main(){intc[10]={1,2.3.45,6,7,8,9,0},i;for(i
最新回复
(
0
)