首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Since the late 1970’s in the face of a severe loss of market share in dozens of industries, manufacturers in the United States h
Since the late 1970’s in the face of a severe loss of market share in dozens of industries, manufacturers in the United States h
admin
2011-12-20
42
问题
Since the late 1970’s in the face of a severe loss of market share in dozens of industries, manufacturers in the United States have been trying to improve productivity—and therefore enhance their international competitiveness—through cost-cutting programs. (Cost-cutting here is defined as raising labor output while holding the amount of labor constant.) However, from 1978 through 1982, productivity—the value of goods manufactured divided by the amount of labor input—did not improve; and while the results were better in the business upturn of the three years following, they ran 25 percent lower than productivity improvements during earlier, post-1945 upturns. At the same time, it became clear that the harder manufactures worked to implement cost-cutting, the more they lost their competitive edge.
With this paradox in mind, I recently visited 25 companies; it became clear to me that the cost-cutting approach to increasing productivity is fundamentally flawed. Manufacturing regularly observes a "40, 40, 20" rule. Roughly 40 percent of any manufacturing-based competitive advantage derives from long-term changes in manufacturing structure (decisions about the number, size, location, and capacity of facilities) and in approaches to materials. Another 40 percent comes from major changes in equipment and process technology. The final 20 percent rests on implementing conventional cost-cutting. This rule does not imply that cost-cutting should not be tried. The well-known tools of this approach—including simplifying jobs and retraining employees to work smarter, not harder—do produce results. But the tools quickly reach the limits of what they can contribute.
Another problem is that the cost-cutting approach hinders innovation and discourages creative people. As Abernathy’s study of automobile manufacturers has shown, an industry can easily become prisoner of its own investments in cost-cutting techniques, reducing its ability to develop new products. And managers under pressure to maximize cost-cutting will resist innovation because they know that more fundamental changes in processes or systems will wreak havoc with the results on which they are measured. Production managers have always seen their job as one of minimizing costs and maximizing output. This dimension of performance has until recently sufficed as a basis of evaluation, but it has created a penny-pinching, mechanistic culture in most factories that has kept away creative managers.
Every company I know that has freed itself from the paradox has done so, in part, by developing and implementing a manufacturing strategy. Such a strategy focuses on the manufacturing structure and on equipment and process technology. In one company a manufacturing strategy that allowed different areas of the factory to specialize in different markets replaced the conventional cost-cutting approach; within three years the company regained its competitive advantage. Together with such strategies, successful companies are also encouraging managers to focus on a wider set of objectives besides cutting costs. There is hope for manufacturing, but it dearly rests oil a different way of managing.
The author refers to Abernathy’s study most probably in order to ______.
选项
A、qualify an observation about one rule governing manufacturing
B、address possible objections to a recommendation about improving manufacturing competitiveness
C、support an earlier assertion about method of increasing productivity
D、suggest the centrality in the Unit States economy of a particular manufacturing industry
答案
C
解析
“As Abernathy’s study of automobile manufacturers has shown,an industry can easily become prisoner of its own investments in cost-cutting techniques,reducing its ability to develop new products.”提到Abernathy的研究主要是否定cost-cutting,从而肯定新方法对于提高生产力的帮助。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/r3ua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
Thisisthepriceandthepromiseofcitizenship.Thisisthesourceofourconfidence—theknowledgethatGodcallsonustosha
CharteroftheUnitedNations
TheGreaterBayArea:HittingtheSpotSharingeconomyinnovatorsindrivetowardsprofit-maximizingandstress-freeparking
directinvestment
"Thedistinctionbetweenlangueandparole"wasfirstputforwardby().
Thelocalauthoritiesrealizedtheneedtomake______totelderlypeopleintheirhousingprograms.
Atpresent,thereisaheateddiscussioninChinaonwhetherpeopleshouldbeencouragedtobuycarsornot.Youaresupposedto
Althoughadolescentmaturationalanddevelopmentalstatesoccurinanorderlysequence,theirtiming______withregardtoonset
Itisnotcompatiblewiththeegalitarianidealthatthereshouldbesharpdifferencesinthescaleofmonetaryrewardforservi
Nervesignalsmaytravelthroughnerveormusclefibersatspeedsashighastwohundredmilesperhour.
随机试题
医乃仁术是指
我国刑法规定的基本原则有()。
证券公司、证券投资咨询机构的研究部门或者研究子公司接受特定客户委托,按照协议约定就尚未覆盖的具体股票提供含有证券估值或投资评级的研究成果或者投资分析意见的,自提供之日起()个月内不得就该股票发布证券研究报告。
西方所谓“三权分立”中的“三权”指:
小张、小王二人同时从甲地出发,驾车匀速在甲乙两地之间往返行驶。小张的车速比小王快,两人出发后第一次和第二次相遇都在同一地点,那么小张的车速是小王的多少倍?
休闲娱乐是许多观众对电影的主要诉求,这______。但电影还是一种文化艺术,它不仅仅承担着娱乐功能,还具有审美和教育等艺术功能,需要______价值和理想。如果观众对电影的诉求一直停留在娱乐上,那对市场将是一种纵容和误导。填入画横线部分最恰当的一项是:
Youhavereadthefollowingmagazineadvertisementinwhichacertaincompanyislookingforanofficeassistant.Youwanttowr
Governmentisabasicmeansoforderinghumanrelations.【C1】______itscitizens,governmentgenerally【C2】______certainwell-organ
转眼,不知怎样一来,整个燕园成了二月兰的天下。二月兰是一种常见的野花。花朵不大,紫白相间。花形和颜色都没有什么特异之处。如果只有一两棵,在百花丛中,决不会引起任何人的注意。但是它却以多制胜,每到春天,和风一吹拂,便绽开了小花;最初只有一朵,两朵,几朵。但是
A.accessB.accordinglyC.advocateD.automaticE.contendF.contentG.enhancedH.enriched
最新回复
(
0
)