首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Since the late 1970’s in the face of a severe loss of market share in dozens of industries, manufacturers in the United States h
Since the late 1970’s in the face of a severe loss of market share in dozens of industries, manufacturers in the United States h
admin
2011-12-20
34
问题
Since the late 1970’s in the face of a severe loss of market share in dozens of industries, manufacturers in the United States have been trying to improve productivity—and therefore enhance their international competitiveness—through cost-cutting programs. (Cost-cutting here is defined as raising labor output while holding the amount of labor constant.) However, from 1978 through 1982, productivity—the value of goods manufactured divided by the amount of labor input—did not improve; and while the results were better in the business upturn of the three years following, they ran 25 percent lower than productivity improvements during earlier, post-1945 upturns. At the same time, it became clear that the harder manufactures worked to implement cost-cutting, the more they lost their competitive edge.
With this paradox in mind, I recently visited 25 companies; it became clear to me that the cost-cutting approach to increasing productivity is fundamentally flawed. Manufacturing regularly observes a "40, 40, 20" rule. Roughly 40 percent of any manufacturing-based competitive advantage derives from long-term changes in manufacturing structure (decisions about the number, size, location, and capacity of facilities) and in approaches to materials. Another 40 percent comes from major changes in equipment and process technology. The final 20 percent rests on implementing conventional cost-cutting. This rule does not imply that cost-cutting should not be tried. The well-known tools of this approach—including simplifying jobs and retraining employees to work smarter, not harder—do produce results. But the tools quickly reach the limits of what they can contribute.
Another problem is that the cost-cutting approach hinders innovation and discourages creative people. As Abernathy’s study of automobile manufacturers has shown, an industry can easily become prisoner of its own investments in cost-cutting techniques, reducing its ability to develop new products. And managers under pressure to maximize cost-cutting will resist innovation because they know that more fundamental changes in processes or systems will wreak havoc with the results on which they are measured. Production managers have always seen their job as one of minimizing costs and maximizing output. This dimension of performance has until recently sufficed as a basis of evaluation, but it has created a penny-pinching, mechanistic culture in most factories that has kept away creative managers.
Every company I know that has freed itself from the paradox has done so, in part, by developing and implementing a manufacturing strategy. Such a strategy focuses on the manufacturing structure and on equipment and process technology. In one company a manufacturing strategy that allowed different areas of the factory to specialize in different markets replaced the conventional cost-cutting approach; within three years the company regained its competitive advantage. Together with such strategies, successful companies are also encouraging managers to focus on a wider set of objectives besides cutting costs. There is hope for manufacturing, but it dearly rests oil a different way of managing.
The author refers to Abernathy’s study most probably in order to ______.
选项
A、qualify an observation about one rule governing manufacturing
B、address possible objections to a recommendation about improving manufacturing competitiveness
C、support an earlier assertion about method of increasing productivity
D、suggest the centrality in the Unit States economy of a particular manufacturing industry
答案
C
解析
“As Abernathy’s study of automobile manufacturers has shown,an industry can easily become prisoner of its own investments in cost-cutting techniques,reducing its ability to develop new products.”提到Abernathy的研究主要是否定cost-cutting,从而肯定新方法对于提高生产力的帮助。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/r3ua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
IntheUnitedStates,andhereinAsia,intellectualpropertyaccountsforasignificantandgrowingsegmentofcommercialtrade
()isthestatechurchinEngland.
Whenitwaspublishedin1959,RobertFrank’sbook,TheAmerican,______hostilityintheUnitedStates.
Becausefolkartisneithercompletelyrejectednoracceptedasanartformbyarthistorians,theirfinalevaluationsofitnec
Despiteatendencytobeovertly______,thepoetryoftheMiddleAgesoftensparkstheimaginationandprovideslivelyentertai
Sheshouldbe______andnotmakeunreasonabledemands.
Intermsofpurequantityofresearchanddebate,businessschoolshaveperformedamazinglyinpromotingmanagementasadistinc
It’snothingnewthatEnglishuseisontherisearoundtheworld,especiallyinbusinesscircles.ThisalsohappensinFrance,
400wordsarerequiredtowriteacompositiononthefollowingtopic:Discussthepossibilityorimpossibilityofthetransfero
Thedramaticchangeoverthethree-decade-longfamilyplanningpolicyhailedbothbypopulaceandtheo-pinionleaders.
随机试题
下列哪项不是疾病发生的基本机制
混运货物可以办理部分货物的声明价值。()
中国报关协会是中国唯一的全国性行业报关协会。()
2011年某居民企业主营业务收入5000万元、营业外收入80万元,与收入配比的成本4100万元,全年发生管理费用、销售费用和财务费用共计700万元,营业外支出60万元(其中符合规定的公益性捐赠支出50万元),2010年度经核定结转的亏损额30万元。2011
依法成立的合同,受法律保护,对当事人具有法律约束力。()
诱因
要制服坏人,有时候要以坏治坏,以小坏对付大坏,以假坏对付真坏。坏人也不会做好事,但是好人只要做过坏事就变成了坏人。由此可以推出:
某人的手表走时出现偏差,时针与分针每重合一次,间隔时间都相当于标准时的72分钟。若他按这个表的走时每天工作8小时,则实际多工作了:
根据下列资料,回答下列问题。2015年1—4月,采矿业固定资产投资为()亿元。
阅读下列说明,回答问题1至问题3,将解答填入答题纸的对应栏内。【说明】某海外代购公司为扩展公司业务,需要开发一个信息化管理系统。请根据公司现有业务及需求完成该系统的数据库设计。【需求描述】(1)记录公司员工信息。员工
最新回复
(
0
)