首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
职业资格
It’s one of the things we are most afraid might happen to us. We go to great lengths to avoid it. And yet we do it all the same.
It’s one of the things we are most afraid might happen to us. We go to great lengths to avoid it. And yet we do it all the same.
admin
2021-06-06
70
问题
It’s one of the things we are most afraid might happen to us. We go to great lengths to avoid it. And yet we do it all the same. That is, we marry the wrong person. So here is the question, why will we marry the wrong person?
For most of recorded history, people married for logical sorts of reasons: because her parcel of land adjoined yours, his family had a flourishing business, her father was the magistrate in town, there was a castle to keep up, or both sets of parents subscribed to the same interpretation of a holy text. And from such reasonable marriages, there flowed loneliness, infidelity, abuse, hardness of heart and screams heard through the nursery doors. The marriage of reason was not, in hindsight, reasonable at all; it was often expedient, narrow-minded, snobbish and exploitative. That is why what has replaced it—the marriage of feeling—has largely been spared the need to account for itself.
What matters in the marriage of feeling is that two people are drawn to each other by an overwhelming instinct and know in their hearts that it is right. Indeed, the more imprudent a marriage appears (perhaps it’s been only six months since they met; one of them has no job or both are barely out of their teens), the safer it can feel.
But though we believe ourselves to be seeking happiness in marriage, it isn’t that simple. What we really seek is familiarity—which may well complicate any plans we might have had for happiness. We are looking to recreate, within our adult relationships, the feelings we knew so well in childhood. The love most of us will have tasted early on was often confused with other more destructive dynamics: feelings of wanting to help an adult who was out of control, of being deprived of a parent’s warmth or scared of his anger, of not feeling secure enough to communicate our wishes. How logical, then, that we should as grown-ups find ourselves rejecting certain candidates for marriage not because they are wrong but because they are too right—too balanced, mature, understanding and reliable—given that in our hearts, such Tightness feels foreign. We marry the wrong people because we don’t associate being loved with feeling of happiness.
Finally, we marry to make a nice feeling permanent. We imagine that marriage will help us to bottle the joy we felt when the thought of proposing first came to us: Perhaps we were in Venice, on the lagoon, in a motorboat, with the evening sun throwing glitter across the sea, chatting about aspects of our souls no one ever seemed to have grasped before, with the prospect of dinner in a risotto place a little later. We married to make such sensations permanent but failed to see that there was no solid connection between these feelings and the institution of marriage.
The good news is that it doesn’t matter if we find we have married the wrong person. We mustn’t abandon him or her, only the founding romantic idea upon which the Western understanding of marriage has been based the last 250 years: that a perfect being exists who can meet all our needs and satisfy our every yearning. We need to swap the romantic view for a tragic (and at points comedic) awareness that every human will frustrate, anger, annoy, madden and disappoint us—and we will (without any malice)
do the same to them
.
The person who is best suited to us is not the person who shares our every taste (he or she doesn’t exist), but the person who can negotiate differences in taste intelligently—the person who is good at disagreement. Rather than some notional idea of perfect complementarity, it is the capacity to tolerate differences with generosity that is the true marker of the "not overly wrong" person. Compatibility is an achievement of love; it must not be its precondition.
Why do people marry the wrong person in the writer’s view?
选项
A、They instinctively reject mature and trustworthy people.
B、They have been misled by the age-long romantic view.
C、They tend to follow their hearts in choosing soul mates.
D、They are willing to accept someone who is different.
答案
A
解析
细节题。根据第四段中的“What we really seek is familiarity”及“How logical,then,that we should as grown-ups find ourselves rejecting certain candidates for marriage not because they are wrong but because they are too right—too balanced,mature,understanding and reliable—given that in our hearts,such rightness feels foreign”可知,作者认为因为人们在婚姻中真正寻求的是熟悉感.这会导致人们拒绝那些正确的人,那些人理智、成熟、善解人意且可靠,但这让他们觉得陌生,所以人们选择与不合适的人结婚。A项正确。虽然倒数第二段提到了“romantic idea”,但并没有讲作者认为这是人们与不合适的人结婚的原因,B项错误。C、D两项原文未提及,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/rZjD777K
本试题收录于:
英语学科知识与教学能力题库教师资格分类
0
英语学科知识与教学能力
教师资格
相关试题推荐
“南浦大桥的建成已成为上海又一重要的标志。她仿佛一把钥匙,打开上海与世界的大门;她仿佛一部史册,叙述着中国的未来;她仿佛一曲优美的交响乐,奏出时代的最强音……”这里运用的修辞手法是()。
导游服务具有反馈作用,具体要求导游人员在导游服务过程中做到()。
导游人员应当严格按照旅游接待计划安排旅行、游览活动,不得擅自增减旅游项目或者中止导游活动。因此,导游人员在任何情况下都无权变更接待计划。()
导游语言要做到准确性,导游人员必须注意()。
从狭义的角度看,导游语言是导游人员与游客交流思想感情、指导游览、进行讲解、传播文化时使用的一种具有丰富表达力、生动形象的()。
导游人员运用突出重点法讲解神农架,对华侨及港澳台同胞重点介绍祭坛,讲解炎帝尝百草、搭架采药的壮举;对青年学生则把重点放在神农架自然博物馆向他们介绍珙桐、金丝猴等珍稀动植物;对喜欢逐新猎奇的游客,着重介绍神农架的“野人”之谜。这是突出了(
TelevisionhastransformedpoliticsintheUnitedStatesbychangingthewayinwhichinformationisdisseminated,byalteringp
_________aimstohelpstudentstopayattentiontoteachingcontentefficientlyatthebeginningoftheclass.
Childrenwhospendmorethantwohoursadayatacomputerorwatchingtelevisionaremorelikelythanotherstohavementalpro
随机试题
A.二陈汤B.温胆汤C.涤痰汤D.桃红四物汤E.血府逐瘀汤
不属于心衰的发作诱因的是
在执行程序中,法院能否根据天银公司的请求主持调解?如果汇丰公司在履行通知指定的期间内提出异议,法院应如何处理?
水闸中的铺盖按材料分,其类型有()。
在我国的法律体系中,《税法》属于()。
生产进度控制的第一环节是()。
慈云岭石窟造像为五代吴越国时期西湖石窟造像的典范之作。()
鸟岛位于青海湖,是我国重要的鸟类栖息地,下图为青海湖流域示意图,读图完成问题。关于布哈河的叙述,正确的是()。
与矩阵可交换的矩阵为____________。
Bankershavebeenblamingthemselvesfortheirtroublesinpublic.Behindthescenes,theyhavebeentakingaimatsomeoneelse;
最新回复
(
0
)