首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A major study of the grocery-buying habits of millions of Americans released late last year found that people using food stamps
A major study of the grocery-buying habits of millions of Americans released late last year found that people using food stamps
admin
2018-01-01
37
问题
A major study of the grocery-buying habits of millions of Americans released late last year found that people using food stamps generally make the same unhealthy food choices as everyone else in America. Too many sweets, salty snacks and prepared desserts, junk food, in other words. But when it came to soda and its sugary ilk, the results were more surprising, and not in a good way. According to the USDA-funded study, shoppers using food stamps spent a larger share of their budget—9.25% to be exact—on sugar-sweetened beverages than other shoppers. Even more startling: Food-stamp shoppers bought more soda than any other single grocery item.
The new data revived an old debate about banning soda from the $71-billion food-stamp program. In February, the House Agriculture Committee held a hearing to gather testimony about the pros and cons of such a restriction. It does seem counterproductive to spend billions of taxpayer dollars in an effort to improve the nutrition of low-income Americans on a product with little or no nutritional value. It is called the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, after all. And soda had been identified as one of the prime culprits in soaring U.S. obesity and Type 2 diabetes rates.
The study and committee debate raised some of the same uncomfortable issues that have caused the proposal to languish in the past. On the conservative side, folks have worried that this type of nannystate regulation will lead to other heavy-handed health-related restrictions. Liberals, meanwhile, have been concerned that it is patronizing and punitive to tell people how to spend their government benefits. Add in the opposition from beverage industry lobby and it’s no surprise this idea hasn’t gotten very far when it’s been proposed. In recent years, a handful of states and cities have tried to impose such a requirement, but were blocked by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
The difference now is that the attitude toward soda has rapidly soured as more evidence has poured in that beverages with added sugars are making people fat and sick. The USDA has issued dietary guidelines warning people to limit their consumption of food with added sugars, the largest sources of which are sweetened beverages. This belief helped San Francisco, Philadelphia and handful of other cities push through new taxes on soda. A handful more are considering their own soda levies.
We know that there are detrimental health effects of drinking lots of soda, but we don’t know if barring SNAP recipients from spending their benefits on soda will really improve their health. It’ s worth finding out by undertaking a limited pilot program, regardless of the qualms we may have about imposing restraints on the poor that better-off Americans don’t face. The assumption is that those billions of dollars not going to buy Coke will be spent on healthier food. But that may not be the case. What if consumption of other sugary items increases? Or if SNAP recipients simply transferred their sweet drink habit ounce-for-ounce to more expensive and still sugar-laden fruit juice? Or if they spent their non-SNAP money on soda? Before making a permanent change, we need to know if it would improve nutrition or be pointlessly punitive.
But it is a good step to take to gather data. And the argument that it would be too hard on grocers to carve out sugary drinks doesn’t hold water. As the study shows, modern grocery check stand technology is sophisticated enough to easily separate out purchases by UPC code. Indeed, SNAP already comes with restrictions on alcohol, tobacco and hot foods. Grocers don’t have a problem sorting them out. The Women, Infant and Children food-assistance program is even more prescriptive, permitting only specific items to be purchased: milk, cheese, cereal and formula, for example, but absolutely nothing with added sugar or artificial sweetener. Ideally, a pilot program would also find ways to improve access to safe drinking water. Denying poor people the ability to use food aid to buy a Coke on a hot day may raise some unsettling questions. Yet the findings in the USDA’s study about excessive soda consumption shouldn’t be ignored.
Which of the following CANNOT be true about the SNAP?
选项
A、It is a government program involving the distribution of $71-billion food-stamps.
B、It has restrictions on the purchase of alcohol, tobacco and hot foods.
C、It targets at the American population of obesity and Type 2 diabetes patients.
D、It triggers heated argument about the use of food-stamps to purchase soda.
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/rlSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
党的十一届三中全会以来,随着党和国家工作重点转移到以经济建设为中心,教育在社会主义现代化建设中的地位和作用也越来越重要,我国教育的改革和发展取得了很大的成就。进入20世纪90年代,科学技术日新月异,知识经济初见端倪,综合国力竞争日趋激烈,我国社会
中国拥有自己的体育传统。大约在公元11世纪宋朝的时候,人们开始玩一种叫做“蹴鞠”的游戏。这个游戏被认为是古代足球的起源,在当时非常流行,女性们也自成一队,玩得兴高采烈。现在,您该明白为什么我们现在的女子足球队那么厉害了。//在北京,有许许多多精彩
A、Hikers,B、Bankers.C、Fishermen.D、Internetserviceproviders.C将选项内容迅速与原文对照。该题中特定信息的找寻非常简单,不用推理判断,只需听者迅速对原文中某些职业名作出反应即可。
Becauseoftheoriginalsin,manyAmericanstaketoalcoholism,whichcostsheavycasualties.
A、BecauseIBMhasbeenbrewingthissaleforabout10years.B、BecauseIBMisgoingtoproducemobilephonesthathaveaccessto
Whoweretakenhostageinthereportedkidnapping?
Economicsendowsprospectivebusinessmenwithquiteafewdesirablequalities,suchasintelligenceandintuition.
美国人交朋友主要有四种方式:工作中、学校里、通过共同的爱好或者一个共同的兴趣,比如说志愿者工作,或者通过一个互相的朋友网。这句话主要讲的是四个方面,第一句话总的不难听懂,后面四个方面也不难听懂,这句话的翻译难点在于要作好比较。四个方面可以简单地记成work
A、Onlythistime,themealisgoodinWhiteRoseRestaurant.B、WhiteRoseRestaurantisnotmyfavoriterestaurant.C、Irarelye
随机试题
吕大爷是糖尿病患者,他的老伴吕大妈十分注意调配他的饮食。吕大妈认为血糖高是因为吃糖引起的,只要饮食中没有糖就不用吃药了。近期,吕大爷因糖尿病并发症住院治疗。出院前,社会工作者小王邀请医生再次向吕大爷夫妇详细讲解了糖尿病与饮食和生活方式的关系,以及控制血糖和
集我国16世纪以前药学大成的本草著作是
组织学表现为恶性者所占比例很高的疾病是
清胆利湿,和胃化痰的方剂是()寒热平调,散结除痰的方剂是()
关于黑社会性质组织犯罪的认定问题,下列说法哪些是正确的?()(2003年卷二第43题)
关于工程咨询公司的不同资质等级所承担的业务范围表述正确的是()。
隧道竣工后,应在直线地段每( )m处加测断面处,测绘以中路线中线为准隧道实际净空。
财务报告企业可以根据需要不定期的编制。( )
根据维纳的两维成败归因理论,稳定的内在原因是()。
Readingliteraturedoesn’tjustimproveyourpowerofimagination./Italsoexpandsyourcapacityforcreativereasoning./As
最新回复
(
0
)