首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
It is popular to lament the growing gap between capitalists and workers. In one respect, however, the gap is shrinking: the numb
It is popular to lament the growing gap between capitalists and workers. In one respect, however, the gap is shrinking: the numb
admin
2017-12-31
60
问题
It is popular to lament the growing gap between capitalists and workers. In one respect, however, the gap is shrinking: the number of workers who own shares in the business that employs them has never been higher. America leads the way: 32m Americans own stock in their companies through pension and profit-sharing plans, and share-ownership and share-option schemes. The idea continues to gain momentum. Hillary Clinton’s recent speeches suggest that she may make it an important plank in her plans to reform capitalism. And worker-capitalists are also on the march everywhere.
Conservatives like employee ownership because it gives workers a stake in the capitalist system. Left-wingers like it because it gives them a piece of the capitalist pie. And middle-of-the-roaders like it because it helps to close a potentially dangerous gap between capital and labour. Britain’s David Cameron praises John Lewis, a retailer entirely owned by its staff. Bernie Sanders, America’s only socialist senator and now a candidate for the Democratic nomination, is a champion of employee share-ownership.
The trend is also being driven by a long-term shift from "defined benefit"(DB)pension plans, in which employers guarantee the retirement income of their workers, to "defined contribution"(DC)schemes, in which workers and employers put money into an investment pot, with no guarantees of how much it will eventually pay out. Including current workers and pensioners there are more than 88m DC plans in existence. A 2013 survey by Aon Hewitt, a consulting firm, found that 14% of such plans’ assets were invested in the shares of the employer in question.
A number of studies have found that workers at firms where employees have a significant stake tend to be more productive and innovative, and to have less staff turnover. Employee ownership has its drawbacks, however. One is the risk that workers have too many eggs in one basket: if their employer goes bust they can lose their pensions as well as their jobs. Just before Enron went bankrupt in 2001 the average employee held 62% of his or her 401(k)assets in Enron shares. Despite various initiatives by Congress to stop firms touting their shares to employees, similar cases are still arising.
A second problem is entrenchment. Supporters of worker ownership argue that it helps companies take a more long-term perspective. Critics argue that it can entrench bad management and undermine a company’s long-term competitiveness: underperforming bosses are much more likely to be able to stay in place, and resist hostile takeovers, if some of the company’s shares are in friendly hands. In 1994 United Airlines handed many of its workers a 55% stake, and representation on the board, in return for pay cuts. But its performance remained poor, and it filed for bankruptcy in 2002.
A third risk is entitlement. The strongest argument in favour of employee ownership is that workers will not only toil harder if they get a slice of the profits, but will make sure that their colleagues do so too. A new paper by Benjamin Dunford and others, argues that commitment can transmute into entitlement. The academics studied a sample of 409 employees at a commercial-property firm in the Midwest and found that those who invested a higher proportion of their 401(k)accounts in company stock expected better benefits than the rest, and took more discretionary leave.(However, the study did not consider whether employee ownership boosted the firm’s overall performance.)
Arguments about employee ownership can easily become too sweeping: grand claims from supporters invite vigorous rebuttals by critics. A great deal depends on how schemes are structured, and the motives for introducing them. Another recent paper, by Han Kim and Paige Ouimet, considers the sizes of ESOPs and of the firms that offer them. They find that small ESOPs(which control a stake of less than 5 % in the company in question)are far more likely to boost productivity than large ones, because firms that introduce large ESOPs are often troubled ones trying to conserve cash by substituting shares for pay, or seeking to fend off hostile takeovers by giving shares to friendly insiders. They also argue that ESOPs are much more likely to work in smaller firms than larger ones because employee-owners can more easily monitor each other and boost overall productivity.
There is plenty to be said for employee ownership. It can sharpen workers’ motivation and go some way to healing a potentially dangerous divide between the working class and the boss class. But if politicians are serious about the idea, they need to think harder about how to make it work in practice. They should pay closer attention to how schemes are designed, and look for ways to tailor regulations and tax incentives so as to encourage well-designed schemes. They also need to deal with the problem of concentrating risk in a single company’ s shares. Given that the average life expectancy of Fortune 500 companies has fallen from 75 years in the 1930s to perhaps just 15 years today, encouraging employees to invest their savings with the companies that employ them is a recipe for miserable retirements.
What are the major drawbacks of employee ownership?
选项
答案
1. the risk: "have too many eggs in one basket": workers could lose their pensions + jobs if the business becomes bankrupt("goes bust")/2. "entrenchment": help establish oneself firmly in a particular position / with posts+positions+places secured, thus lose the initiative / "entrench bad management" + destroy a company’s long-term competitiveness/ in other words, it might become one of the causes which lead to bankruptcy /3. "entitlement": giving sb. the right to do sth. or have sth. / another possible negative consequence / "the commitment can transmute into entitlement": / the system might not promote the firms’ "overall performance"/ workers might not "toil harder"/ instead, they might just expect "better benefits" / take more "discretionary leave"/ lose some of the motivation
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/s0SO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Theeraofdividedgovernmentbegins,inauspiciously.Willthepresidentbeabletoseethewoodforthesubpoenas?Isuspectth
Itwasaone-linechatreplyfromanAncestryDNAcustomer-servicerepthatrippedCatherineSt.Clair’slife.At57,shewasher
Itwasaone-linechatreplyfromanAncestryDNAcustomer-servicerepthatrippedCatherineSt.Clair’slife.At57,shewasher
Itwasaone-linechatreplyfromanAncestryDNAcustomer-servicerepthatrippedCatherineSt.Clair’slife.At57,shewasher
Itwasaone-linechatreplyfromanAncestryDNAcustomer-servicerepthatrippedCatherineSt.Clair’slife.At57,shewasher
Conversely,aEuropeweakenanddividebytheworld’smostpowerfulcountrywouldexacerbateproblemsfarbeyondtheEU’sborder
Thissystemhasmonitorcapabilitycoveringtheentireproperty,insideandout.Additionally,teachersandparentsarevigilant
Bakedbeansarecheapestherebutourvicesarepunished—cigarettesandalcoholcostmoreinBritain.
DeepeningthefinancialreforminChinawilloffernewopportunitiestofacilitatecooperationbetweenforeignbanksandtheChi
A、Theyareconsideredasfashionableitems.B、Theykeeppeopleclosertoeachother.C、Theyaremoreconvenienttousersthanfi
随机试题
脑震荡的主要临床表现有
10(6)kV变电所高压配电室内各种通道正确的是()。
城市用地适用性的评定要因地制宜,特别是抓住对用地影响最突出的()要素,进行重点的分析与评价。
爆破有害效应主要包括()。
以下发展战略可选择的途径中,属于内部发展的是()。
若法定存款准备率是20%,商业银行最初吸收的存款是100亿元,则银行能够创造的货币总量为()。
养蜂人将蜂箱放在场头,蜜蜂在附近采集花粉。后养牛人将牛拴在离蜂箱5米远处,不久牛被蜜蜂蜇死。该案中关于过错的认定,说法正确的是()。
扎根理论是运用系统化的程序,针对某一现象来发展并归纳式地引导出扎根的理论的一种定性研究方法。研究者在研究开始之前一般没有理论假设,直接从实际观察入手,从原始资料中归纳出经验概括,然后上升到理论。根据上述定义,下列各项中不属于扎根理论的是:
某人乘船逆流而上,在途中不慎将一救生圈掉入水中,在继续前进了20分钟后才发现,于是返回追寻。待追到救生圈时,它已经顺流而下漂到距离落水处2千米的地方。请问,此人从发现救生圈丢失到找回救生圈共用了多长时间?()
____ofover5%areattractiveifthedollarreallyisgoingtostabilize.
最新回复
(
0
)