首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In politics, in the courts, even on the ubiquitous TV talkshow, it is good form to pick an intellectual fight. People attack eac
In politics, in the courts, even on the ubiquitous TV talkshow, it is good form to pick an intellectual fight. People attack eac
admin
2011-01-10
25
问题
In politics, in the courts, even on the ubiquitous TV talkshow, it is good form to pick an intellectual fight. People attack each other- hurl insults, even- and it counts as logical argument. I cannot understand it.
It seems that our society favours a kind of ritualized aggression. Everywhere you look, in newspapers and on television, issues are presented using the terminology of war and conflict. We hear of battles, duels and disputes. We see things in terms of winners and losers, victors and victims.
The problem is society’s unquestioning belief in the advantages of the debate as a way of solving disagreements, even proving right from wrong. Our brainwashing begins early at school, when the brightest pupils are co-opted onto the debating system. They get there because they can think up a good argument to support their case. Once on the debate team, they learn that they earn bonus points for the skill with which they verbally attack, or insult, the opposing team. They win if they can successfully convince the audience that they are right, even if the case they are arguing is clearly nonsensual. They do this by proving themselves to be stronger, brighter, more outrageous, even.
The training in this adversarial approach continues at our tertiary institutions. The standard way to present an academic paper, for instance, is to take up an opposing argument to something expressed by another academic. The paper must set out to prove the other person wrong. This is not at all the same thing as reading the original paper with an open mind and discovering that you disagree with it.
The reverence for the adversarial approach spills over into all areas of life. Instead of answering their critics, politicians learn to sidestep negative comments and turn the point around to an attack on accusers. Defense lawyers argue the case for their clients even when they suspect they may be guilty. And ordinary people use the same tactics—just listen to your teenager next time you pull him up for coming home late. You can be sure a stream of abuse will flow about your own time—keeping, your irritating habits, your history of bad parenting.
Unfortunately, the smarter your kid, the better his or her argument against you will be. You’ll be upset, but you’ll comfort yourself that those teenage monsters of yours will one day turn into mature, though adults who can look after themselves—by which you mean, of course, they will be able to argue their way out of sticky situations.
It’s not that you should never use angry words, or take up a position in opposition to someone or something. There are certainly times when one should take a stand, and in such cases strong words are quite appropriate: if you witness injustice, for instance, or feel passionately about another’s folly. Mockery—so cruel when practised on the innocent—can be very useful in such situations. There is no better way to bring down a tyrant than to mock him mercilessly.
What I dislike is the automatic assumption most people have when it comes to disagreements: they should attack, abuse, preferably overpower their opponent, at whatever the cost. The approach is so ingrained that "compromise" has become a dirty word. We feel guilty if we are conciliatory rather than confrontational. We have trained ourselves, or been brainwashed into believing, that to be pleasant is a sign of weakness.
But just think how easy it can be to persuade a "difficult" person to be considerate of you or your wished when you are pleasant to them, and unthreatening. Give them a way out of a potentially aggressive situation without losing face, and they will oblige you willingly.
Discuss a subject without taking an adversarial position and you will find the other person happy to explore the possibilities with you. I’m prepared to bet on it. You’ll get closer to the truth of the matter than you would by going to each other hammer and tongs.
Which of the following words does NOT refer to "debate"?
选项
A、Intellectual fight.
B、Conflict.
C、Victim.
D、Dispute.
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/uTcO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
TheeasternbluebirdisconsideredthemostattractivebirdnativeofNorthAmericabymanybird-watchers.
Theamazingsuccessofhumansasa【C1】______istheresultoftheevolutionarydevelopmentofourbrainswhichhasled,amongoth
Researchshouldcontinueoncontrollednuclearfusion,butnoenergyprogramshouldbepremisedonitsexistenceuntilithaspr
Someofthelow-endMade-in-Chinamechanical-electronicproductsarenotsellingwellinexportmarketascomparedwithwhatare
InterpersonalRelationshipsInthelast25yearswehavewitnessedanimpressivegrowthinourknowledgeaboutemotionsande
InterpersonalRelationshipsInthelast25yearswehavewitnessedanimpressivegrowthinourknowledgeaboutemotionsande
西藏森林面积717万公顷,活立木蓄积量达20.91亿立方米,保存有中国最大的原始森林。为了保护西藏的生态环境,政府实行限额采伐,以严格控制森林的采伐规模,每年的商品性采伐量一直控制在15万立方米以内。//同时,对采伐基地进行及时更新,恢复森林植被。在影响长
A、Feasible.B、Impractical.C、Unpopular.D、Inefficient.A根据题干要求在原文中找寻反对党的意见,发现原文最后一段关于反对党派的意见有如下说法“...haveraisedquestionsabout
总体上来说,女性工作时间更长,收入更低,工作中的乐趣更少,研究表明,同等工作,男性能挣到一美元,而女性只能挣到74美分。这句话也是一个比较句,做笔记时要把比较的内容记下来。longerhours,lesspay,enjoyment,另外一个是要把第二个
你已做了五年多的市议员了,但在此之前你是一名教师。你为何会决定涉足纽约市的地方政界呢?
随机试题
A.甘油B.3一磷酸甘油C.3一磷酸甘油醛D.1,3一二磷酸甘油酸属于脂肪组织中合成甘油三酯的原料是
Animalsaredividedintomanygroups.Somegroupsofanimalsincludethe,insects,fish,amphibians,reptiles,birdsandmammals
患者,男,56岁。缺失,松动Ⅰ度,无牙体疾患,无倾斜扭转,X线显示牙槽骨水平吸收,根分叉区未破坏。健康。行双端固定桥修复。正确的处理是
某项目借款2000万元,借款期限3年,年利率为6%。若每半年计复利一次,则实际年利率会高出名义利率()。
对于市场化动作的()等项目,通过经济分析来论证项目的经济价值,为制定财务方案提供依据。
教师对学生的表扬是一种激发学生学习的正诱因。()
从所给的四个选项中,选择最合适的一个填入括号处,使之呈现一定的规律性:
“长征二号F”火箭的总设计师刘竹生为了实现我国“可上九天揽月”的强国梦,四十年如一日,夜以继日、勤奋工作,攻克了一个个技术难题,为我国火箭事业作出了突出的贡献,为其他科技工作者树立了榜样。刘竹生的人生实践证明了一个哲理,即()。
设f(x)在[1,+∞)上连续且可导,若曲线y=f(x),直线x=1,x=t(t>1)与x轴围成的平面区域绕x轴旋转一周所得的旋转体的体积为且f(2)=,求函数y=f(x)的表达式.
信息系统开发的结构化方法将信息系统开发的全过程划分为相互独立而又相互依存的阶段,信息系统的逻辑模型形成于
最新回复
(
0
)