首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
With a gnashing of teeth, the employment minister Chris Grayling backed down as companies shied away from his unpaid work scheme
With a gnashing of teeth, the employment minister Chris Grayling backed down as companies shied away from his unpaid work scheme
admin
2014-09-09
68
问题
With a gnashing of teeth, the employment minister Chris Grayling backed down as companies shied away from his unpaid work scheme that threatened young people’ s already meagre weekly benefit of 53. 45. Protests and a Twitter storm against unpaid shelf-stacking alarmed Tesco into paying the minimum wage and guaranteeing jobs: a brilliant result. UK Uncut exposing Barclays’ tax avoidance has finally led HMRC to act, so as St Paul’s Occupy protesters move on, don’t say protest is pointless.
However, objections by bishops were bootless as the welfare reform bill passed, barely amended. The government revels in a majority heartily supporting its ? 18bn benefit cuts. A drip-drip of scrounger stories did the heavy lifting, so most people have no idea what brutality is to be done in their name. The BBC has failed to inform the nation, bolstering the "scrounger" narrative with ill-timed documentaries on the workshy by Panorama. With dole claimants rising towards 3 million, and 6. 3 million in all seeking work or longer hours, the government has devised a strange sociology suggesting an epidemic of laziness, ignoring the worst depression since the 1930s.
But has it finally gone too far? When the public discovers what’s happening, attitudes may change. Remember Gordon Brown’s catastrophic miscalculation in abolishing the 10p tax rate for the lowest paid; using the money to bribe middle earners by cutting their taxes backfired badly. Fickle voters can’t be relied on to be selfish all the time, so when people hear what’s about to happen, they may react in the same way.
On 6 April, low-paid working couples with children will lose a colossal ? 3,870 in tax credits from a typical income of ? 17,000. Where previously someone in the family had to work 16 hours to qualify, now they must work 24 hours a week or lose tax credits. But what if no extra hours are available? Hundreds of thousands of households will be caught in this trap, with 470,000 children. Most already want longer hours. TUC research says 3 million part-timers seek full-time jobs; Usdaw, the shopworkers’ union, finds 78% of its part-timers can’t get extra hours. Government figures for people getting jobs forget to say most are part-time. Nor do they proclaim the severe punishment about to fall on families failing to work 24 hours. Oddly, the victims are the very people Conservatives praise—working couples with children, struggling to stay off the dole. Will this enormous drop in incomes fall below the political radar—or will voters discover and be shocked?
Everyone asks for extra hours: in Liverpool there are 8. 5 unemployed for every vacancy. Without more hours, they expect to lose about ? 300 a month in tax credits. But just as existing workers struggle for crucial extra hours, the Department for Work and Pensions puts the unemployed to work for free at shelf-stacking and cleaning— 34,200 young people have been put on unpaid work experience so far, with weak evidence it finds them jobs. Jonathan Porte, of the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, finds the ministers’ claim that 50% leave benefits compares poorly with the 60% who leave jobseeker’ s allowance anyway within three months with no scheme.
Conditions have always been attached to benefits—the "no fifth option of continued full benefit" of Labour’s New Deal, for example. Compulsion for the unemployed to join programmes seems reasonable so long as schemes are high quality with a good chance of leading to jobs. Until now, great care was taken not to displace real jobs through free labour for large companies able to pay minimum wage. Work experience for the young has drawn all the flak, but the "mandatory work activity" programme forces adults to work up to 30 hours a week over a month for free, or lose benefit. The DWP’s own assessment shows those mandated into unpaid work are more likely to be from an ethnic minority and disabled than other unemployed people.
So on the one hand the DWP imposes draconian cuts on families who can’t find 24 hours a week paid work, yet at the same time puts tens of thousands of free labourers into their workplaces, making those extra hours ever harder to find. This week I had a run-in with the former social security secretary Peter Lilley on Radio 5 Live as he tried to defend the government’s schemes, but it was plain he had forgotten the essential ingredients in Project Work, his 1996 initiative, which I praised at the time: people were paid extra above their benefits, and worked for charities and community programmes to avoid displacing other workers—and compulsion was applied at a time of rising employment, with a good chance of leading to real jobs. None of these principles applies now. Worst of all, depriving existing staff of extra hours of work will contribute to families losing their tax credits. Unemployment pay had dropped in 35 years from 17% of average earnings to just 10% : now it’s falling far faster.
April will bring plenty of Nick Clegg’s promised social mobility—but it will all be downwards. Raising tax thresholds does nothing for these people, as hundreds of thousands of children are pushed into poverty by a monumental drop in family income. This cut denies everything the government says about "making work pay" and supporting couples. Politically, will this finally shock enough voters?
Which of the following is TRUE according to the passage?
选项
A、Families that want to work will suffer, not workshies
B、Families that do not want to work will suffer, not part-timers
C、Families that work up to 30 hours a month for free will suffer most
D、Families that work extra hours will receive the income of 3870 a month
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/uXSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
MostpeoplewouldbeimpressedbythehighqualityofmedicineavailabletomostAmericans.Thereisalotofspecialization,a
Since2008,therehavebeenmoreandmorefamouspeopleintheactingprofessionwhosenamebecomes"smelly",andwhoselifeand
"Historydoesn’trepeatitself,"arguedMarkTwain,"butitdoesrhyme."Inthisinstance,history’sechocouldscarcelybemo
Modernindustrialsocietygrantslittlestatustooldpeople.Infact,suchasocietyhasasystemofbuilt-inobsolescence.The
TidinessTidinessmeanskeepingthingsoutofsightandyetavailablewhenwanted.Itimpliesthatthereisa【C1】________for
WhenDidAidsBegin?Theyearwas1959.Location:thecentralAfricancityofLeopoldville,nowcalledKinshasa,shortlybef
Duringthe________oftherain,shereturnedhomeimmediately.
Inthepopularmind,theInternetistherealizationoftheglobalvillage,wheretheflowofinformationandideasisunimpeded
U.S.jobgrowthwassurprisinglystrongin2018,butdon’texpectthattohappenagainthisyear,witheconomicheadwindsintens
KansasandIowa,richinwindresources,canprovidemoreelectricitythanotherstates.
随机试题
阑尾切除术后最常见的并发症是
采用已检定合格的质量比较仪作为衡量仪器,用2个标称质量值为200g的F1等级标准砝码校准1个标称质量值为400g的专用砝码。检定证书给出质量比较仪的最大秤量为500g,分辨力为1mg,在400g秤量点的扩展不确定度为U95=5mg;标准砝码采用标
医药代表赵某为了争取某三甲医院院长王某采购其负责的药品,为其提供科研经费50万元。同时,为了使这些药品销售数量增加,又为事业编制的医生吴某多次报销国际学术会议费用,吴某通过开具处方,为赵某销售了200万元的药品。赵某给予王某、吴某的相关费用都没有在该医院记
非正式组织是基于( )
一位患者因肇事,造成耻骨骨折并刺破膀胱,检查所见,耻骨联合处已塌陷,骨折类应属
A.P波B.QRS波群C.T波D.ST段心电图上反映心室各部位心肌细胞均处于动作电位平台期的是
以下关于环境噪声现状测量量说法正确的是( )。
某企业申报进境的保税加工料件,经海关批准,在放行前全部退运出境。企业在填制出口货物报关单时,“贸易方式”栏填报错误的有()。
我国传统吉祥图案中寓意“多子多福”的形象是()
以机关名义发文的重要文稿,由()审核。
最新回复
(
0
)