首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Nobody has a good word for apathy. Arnold Toynbee, a historian, thought it defined the penultimate stage of decadence. Civilisat
Nobody has a good word for apathy. Arnold Toynbee, a historian, thought it defined the penultimate stage of decadence. Civilisat
admin
2017-03-15
36
问题
Nobody has a good word for apathy. Arnold Toynbee, a historian, thought it defined the penultimate stage of decadence. Civilisations proceed, he said, from bondage to spiritual faith; from spiritual faith to courage; from courage to liberty; from liberty to abundance; from abundance to selfishness; from selfishness to apathy; from apathy to dependency; and from dependency back to bondage. Apathy is also anti-democratic: democracy requires the informed consent of the governed, and will not last if voters can’t be bothered.
Europe’s leaders also fret that apathy is anti-European. Popular indifference, they fear, leaves the European Union’s institutions vulnerable to the gusts of popular indignation. Their worry is understandable. The polling evidence, for what it is worth, shows that people who say they know a lot about the EU tend to support it. Those who know nothing and care less tend to be Eurosceptics. So governments and public institutions naturally seek to combat Euro-apathy as much as they can: by public-relations campaigns, by exhortations that Europe must dream (Jacques Delors’s admonition against indifference)—or by stunts such as last weekend’s birthday bash in Berlin to mark the 50th anniversary of the EU’s founding Treaty of Rome.
If apathy were indeed a threat to European integration, there would seem to be much reason to worry. Apathy is lolling about everywhere. Voter turnout has fallen in every election to the European Parliament since the institution was created. In the most recent one, in 2004, it slumped below 50%—a lower rate than India’s parliamentary polls. The gap between turnout in national elections and in European ones is widening, so the problem seems especially acute for the EU.
Britain’s Prime Minister, Tony Blair, has a website where people can file online petitions. It is an unscientific measure of popular concerns, but intriguing nonetheless. A recent petition asking Britain to hold a referendum on any EU constitution got a few thousand electronic signatures. One opposing road pricing got a few million.
It is hard to measure degrees of apathy non-anecdotally because people tend to react badly to polling questions such as "Do you care two hoots about the EU?" But lack of knowledge might be taken as a proxy for lack of concern. Here too the evidence is discouraging. Some three-quarters of Europeans, asked to rate their own knowledge of the EU, say it is modest or non-existent, and this share is rising, not falling.
Yet is it really true that apathy is an obstacle to European integration? A certain amount of apathy is understandable, perhaps inevitable. The EU’s institutions are remote and deliberately complex (deliberately in the sense that they seek to balance pan-European decision-making with national checks and balances). Most voters have no idea who represents them in the European Parliament and would not recognise a European commissioner if one turned up on their doorstep.
There are also reasons why apathy might have grown. Historically, the term entered common use after the First World War, when it was associated with shell-shock and depression. The EU is suffering from the bombshell when French and Dutch voters rejected the draft constitution in 2005. It can also be argued that economic sluggishness and high unemployment (at least until the current recovery) have led to a continent-wide depression.
More important, apathy has its compensations, especially for Europhiles. Without it, European integration would not have gone as far as it has. There was almost no debate about the content of the constitution in the referendum campaigns in Spain or Luxembourg, which approved it by wide margins. The voters who looked most closely at the text were in France and the Netherlands. Similarly, Britain debated the merits of the single currency more extensively than any other country. But Britain stayed out, while others adopted it without discussion.
European integration can proceed without popular enthusiasm because of its character: the EU has a large regulatory component and much integration proceeds through rules-based co-operation. Rules and technical standards are peculiarly unsuited to mobilising popular opinion, whether for or against.
Most people are content to leave them to experts. Integration by regulation proceeds under the voters’ indifferent gaze. In that sense, apathy is the Europhiles’ best friend.
Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, has learned this lesson. The "Berlin declaration" to mark the 50th birthday was written in secret and signed only by the EU’s own representatives: Ms. Merkel as holder of the EU presidency and the heads of the European Commission and Parliament. It seems likely that any revised constitutional treaty- will also be cooked up in semi-secret, with the aim of ratification by national parliaments, not referendums. Let sleeping voters lie.
But there is a further manifestation of apathy to consider: a behavioural condition associated with it, known as "learned helplessness". In 1965 a psychologist, Martin Seligman, subjected two groups of dogs to electric shocks. The first group could end the punishment by pressing a lever. These dogs recovered quickly; in a subsequent experiment, they learned to avoid further shocks by jumping a low wall. The second group had a lever that did nothing. They became apathetic and in the subsequent experiment simply cowered on the electrified floor, unable to escape the shocks. They had "learned helplessness".
In Europe, the treaties of Maastricht and Nice were rejected by Danish and Irish voters, only to be largely implemented later. If the constitution is successfully revived—a big if—it would continue this pattern. Some EU leaders may hope that, if they do this often enough, apathetic voters will learn that they are helpless to stop further integration, even when they want to.
What is the definition of apathy according to Arnold Toynbee?
选项
答案
Stages from selfishness to apathy; from apathy to dependency and from dependency back to bondage. Apathy is also anti-democratic. Democracy requires the informed consent of the governed. It will not last if voters can’t be bothered.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ufSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Thehistorianmayhopethatlaboratoriesmayhavehadcapaciouscupboardsintowhichunusedpieceshavebeenstuffedandthuspr
Inthefaceofthe________ofhisnation,thepoetwasverysadanddeterminedtodevotehimselftothecountry,yethiseveryef
Asthefederalgovernmentshutdownapproachesthetwo-weekmark,it’sbecomepainfullyapparentthatthepubliccannolongerru
女士们、先生们:我非常高兴能利用英中贸协年会的机会向英国工商界朋友们致以诚挚的问候。多年来,英中贸协一直关心和支持中英关系发展,是堪称两国友好交流的桥梁和互利合作的纽带。在此,我谨对英中贸协及诸位长期为促进中英经贸合作所做的不懈努力和杰出贡献表示
下面你将听到一段题为“说聪明”的论述。聪明的人,智力发达、记忆和理解能力也强。聪明是好事,是财富,应好好利用,用于进步;用于获取知识,用于为祖国为人民做好事,为大家也为自己好。应该承认,人和人不一样,有的人就是聪明。周恩来就是一个聪明的人,早在年
主席先生,女士们、先生们:目前,国际形势正处于深刻变化之中。和平与发展仍然是当今时代的主题,总体和平的国际环境为世界经济发展提供了有利条件;科技进步日新月异并孕育着新的重大突破,前所未有地提高了人类认识、把握宏观和微观世界的能力,展现了新的发展
到1999年春季,美国环境保护署和中国国家环境保护总局(SEPA)的官员签订了一个协议备忘录,建立了两国在排污权交易和酸雨控制方面的双边示范项目。在签字仪式上召开的国际研讨会上,与会者通过介绍了解了美国环境保护协会与中国地方城市之间的合作项目,这也是到目前
ThemovieactorArnoldSchwargenegger,whoisrunningforgovernorofCalifornia,belongstotheconservativeDemocraticParty.
WhichofthefollowingisNOTincludedintheBeltandRoadInitiativeeffortstobuildawebofinfrastructure?
世界每天都在变小。全球化、信息革命和通信使居住在这个星球的人们更紧密地联系在一起。关键词汇:globalization(全球化);revolution(革命)。closely-knit(紧密结合)。难点:词汇的理解和三个并列主语的记录。关键词globali
随机试题
下列的各种表示中,()不是存储器计量单位。
最常见的子宫肌瘤变性是
护士执业注册的有效期为
在我国,个人投资者从事期货交易必须在()开户。
定向资产管理合同约定的投资范围不得超出法律、行政法规和中国证监会规定允许客户投资的范围,并应当与证券公司的()相匹配。
现象一:今年春节以来,“民工荒”再次成为热点,为了“抢人”,东南沿海企业使出了种种雷人招数;而一些大学毕业生去农民工劳务市场找工作却没人要,农民工“抢”了大学生的饭碗。现象二:有些大学毕业生在校期间刻苦读书,但由于缺少社交能力和社会关系网,找不到
爱默生在散文《圆》中说,人生就是一个个同心圆,永远不要把自己局限在现有的圆圈里。只有不断___________自己生命的深度与广度,勇敢尝试和追求不那么“___________”的目标,才能超越自己,走向未来。填入画横线部分最恰当的一项是()。
学生品德不良的原因是什么?
证明:A~B,其中并求可逆矩阵P,使得P-1AP=B.
阅读以下说明,回答问题。【说明】某公司A楼高40层,每层高3.3m,同一楼层内任意两个房间最远传输距离不超过90m,A楼和B楼之间距离为500m,需在整个大楼进行综合布线,其结构如图l一23所示。为满足公司业务发展的需要,要求
最新回复
(
0
)