首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In 1965, America’s big companies had a hell of a year. The stock market was booming. Sales were rising briskly, profit margins w
In 1965, America’s big companies had a hell of a year. The stock market was booming. Sales were rising briskly, profit margins w
admin
2015-01-10
71
问题
In 1965, America’s big companies had a hell of a year. The stock market was booming. Sales were rising briskly, profit margins were fat, and corporate profits as a percentage of GDP were at an all-time high. Almost half a century later, some things look much the same: big American companies have had a hell of a year, with the stock market soaring, margins strong, and profits hitting a new all-time high. But there’s one very noticeable difference. In 1965, CEOs at big companies earned on average about 20 times as much as their typical employee. These days, CEOs earn about 270 times as much.
That huge gap between the top and the middle is the result of a boom in executive compensation, which rose 876 per cent between 1978 and 2011. In response, we’ve had a host of regulatory reforms designed to curb executive pay. The latest of these is a rule, unveiled by the SEC last month, requiring companies to disclose the ratio of the CEO’s pay to that of the median worker. The idea is that, once the disparity is made public, companies will be less likely to award outsized pay packages.
Faith in disclosure has been crucial to the regulation of executive pay since the 1930s. More recently, rules have made companies detail the size and the structure of compensation packages and have enforced transparency about the kinds of comparisons they rely on to determine salaries. The result is that shareholders today know far more about CEO compensation than ever before. There’s only one problem: even as companies are disclosing more and more, executive pay keeps going up and up.
This isn’ t a coincidence: the drive for transparency has actually helped fuel the spiralling salaries. For one thing, it gives executives a good idea of how much they can get away with asking for. A more crucial reason, though, has to do with the way boards of directors set salaries. As Charles Elson and Craig Ferrere write, boards at most companies use what’ s called " peer benchmarking. " They look at the CEO salaries at peer-group firms, and then peg their CEO’s pay to the 50th, 75th, or 90th percentile of the peer group—never lower. This leads to the so-called Lake Wobegon effect: every CEO gets treated as above average. "Relying on peer-group comparisons, the way boards do, mathematically guarantees that pay is going to go up," Elson told me.
On top of this, peer-group comparisons aren’ t always honest: boards can be too cozy with CEOs and may tweak the comparisons to justify overpaying. A recent study shows that boards tend to include as peers companies that are bigger than they are and that pay CEOs more. The system is skewed by so-called "leapfroggers," the few CEOs in a given year who, whether by innate brilliance or by dumb luck, end up earning astronomical salaries. Those big paydays reset the baseline expectations for everyone else.
This isn’t just an American problem. Nor is it primarily a case of boards being helplessly in thrall to a company’ s executives. Boards are far more independent of management than they used to be, and it’s notable that a CEO hired from outside a company—typically gets 20 to 25 per cent more than an inside candidate. The real issues are subtler, though no less insidious. Some boards remain convinced of what Elson calls "superstar theory": they think that CEOs can work their magic anywhere, and must be overpaid to stay. In addition, Elson said, "if you pay below average, it makes it look as if you’d hired a below-average CEO, and what board wants that?"
Transparent pricing has perverse effects in other fields. In a host of recent cases, public disclosure of the prices that hospitals charge for various procedures has ended up driving prices up rather than down. And the psychological causes in both situations seem similar. We tend to be uneasy about bargaining in situations where the stakes are very high: do you want the guy doing your neurosurgery, or running your company, to be offering discounts? Better, in the event that something goes wrong, to be able to tell yourself that you spent all you could. And overspending is always easier when you’ re spending someone else’ s money. Corporate board members are disbursing shareholder funds; most patients have insurance to foot the bill.
Sunlight is supposed to be the best disinfectant. But there’ s something naive about the new SEC rule, which presumes that full disclosure will embarrass companies enough to restrain executive pay. As Elson told me, "People who can ask to be paid a hundred million dollars are beyond embarrassment. " More important, as long as the system for setting pay is broken, more disclosure makes things worse instead of better. We don’t need more information. We need boards of directors to step up and set pay themselves, instead of outsourcing the job to their peers. The rest of us don’ t get to live in Lake Wobegon. CEOs shouldn’t, either.
According to the passage, the rapid increase in executive compensation______.
选项
A、is solidly based on their contribution to companies’ development
B、leads to the huge disparity between the top and the middle in income
C、should be immediately stopped under regulatory reforms
D、will play a more important role in promoting company’s profit margins
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/uxSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
HenryDavidThoreau—WhyIWenttotheWoodsLetusspendonedayasdeliberatelyasNature,andnotbethrownoffthetrack
Itiswellknownthatteenageboystendtodobetter【C1】________maththangirls,thatmalehighschoolstudentsaremorelikely
Itiswellknownthatteenageboystendtodobetter【C1】________maththangirls,thatmalehighschoolstudentsaremorelikely
AlthoughtherearemanyskillfulBraillereaders,thousandsofotherblindpeoplefinditdifficulttolearnthatsystemTheyar
Inthefaceofthe________ofhisnation,thepoetwasverysadanddeterminedtodevotehimselftothecountry,yethiseveryef
尊敬的来宾,女士们,先生们:早上好!我很高兴来参加《财富》全球论坛,也很荣幸在此与大家交流一下我的看法。27年前,“开放”对于中国还是一个很陌生的词汇。在27年问,国民生产总值增加了1,100%,平均增速达9.4%。开放给中国人民
我们需要的是一种“宽容的文化”,一种与人们认同开放的外向型精神需求相适应的方法。宽容不是指对那些我们认为是“其他人”的人漠不关心,也不是对他们的文化、宗教、背景与起源漠然置之。宽容需要我们了解并理解这些“其他人”。当熟悉的体制不复存在,国界变得无
StevenAveryfaceslifeimprisonforarapeofayoungwoman18yearsago.
A、TofindprofessorSteinfield.B、Tolookforpasttestspapers.C、Tolookforthewoman.D、Tolookforanaspirinforhisheada
A、Alawprofessor.B、Alawyer.C、Alegaladvisor.D、Ahighcourtjudge.A
随机试题
最可能的诊断是下列治疗中哪项是错误的
A.正常酸碱平衡状态或呼酸B.代酸未代偿或呼碱C.代碱未代偿D.呼酸或代碱E.呼碱或代酸AB<SR
下列指标可较全面地描述正态分布资料特征的是
第三代头孢菌素是在7-位的氨基侧链上有2-氨基噻唑-α-甲氧亚胺基乙酰基,对多数β-内酰胺酶高度稳定。属于第三代头孢菌素的药物是
按照权证行权的基础资产或标的资产,可将权证分为()。
调控主体和规制主体的宏观调控权和市场规制权,要具体地规定于各类经济法的法律、法规之中,这是“职权法定”的具体体现。()
集装箱提单中有关承运人责任期限的条款,一般都规定为“从收到货物时起到交付货物止”,以替代普通船提单下的“钩至钩原则”。()
7,9,一1,5,()
根据下面材料回答下列题。若保持与2010年相同的增长速度,到2012年河北省规模以上工业利润总额绝对值大约是()。
Neuroscientistshavelongunderstoodthatthebraincanrewireitselfinresponsetoexperience—aphenomenonknownasneuroplast
最新回复
(
0
)