首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In 1965, America’s big companies had a hell of a year. The stock market was booming. Sales were rising briskly, profit margins w
In 1965, America’s big companies had a hell of a year. The stock market was booming. Sales were rising briskly, profit margins w
admin
2015-01-10
68
问题
In 1965, America’s big companies had a hell of a year. The stock market was booming. Sales were rising briskly, profit margins were fat, and corporate profits as a percentage of GDP were at an all-time high. Almost half a century later, some things look much the same: big American companies have had a hell of a year, with the stock market soaring, margins strong, and profits hitting a new all-time high. But there’s one very noticeable difference. In 1965, CEOs at big companies earned on average about 20 times as much as their typical employee. These days, CEOs earn about 270 times as much.
That huge gap between the top and the middle is the result of a boom in executive compensation, which rose 876 per cent between 1978 and 2011. In response, we’ve had a host of regulatory reforms designed to curb executive pay. The latest of these is a rule, unveiled by the SEC last month, requiring companies to disclose the ratio of the CEO’s pay to that of the median worker. The idea is that, once the disparity is made public, companies will be less likely to award outsized pay packages.
Faith in disclosure has been crucial to the regulation of executive pay since the 1930s. More recently, rules have made companies detail the size and the structure of compensation packages and have enforced transparency about the kinds of comparisons they rely on to determine salaries. The result is that shareholders today know far more about CEO compensation than ever before. There’s only one problem: even as companies are disclosing more and more, executive pay keeps going up and up.
This isn’ t a coincidence: the drive for transparency has actually helped fuel the spiralling salaries. For one thing, it gives executives a good idea of how much they can get away with asking for. A more crucial reason, though, has to do with the way boards of directors set salaries. As Charles Elson and Craig Ferrere write, boards at most companies use what’ s called " peer benchmarking. " They look at the CEO salaries at peer-group firms, and then peg their CEO’s pay to the 50th, 75th, or 90th percentile of the peer group—never lower. This leads to the so-called Lake Wobegon effect: every CEO gets treated as above average. "Relying on peer-group comparisons, the way boards do, mathematically guarantees that pay is going to go up," Elson told me.
On top of this, peer-group comparisons aren’ t always honest: boards can be too cozy with CEOs and may tweak the comparisons to justify overpaying. A recent study shows that boards tend to include as peers companies that are bigger than they are and that pay CEOs more. The system is skewed by so-called "leapfroggers," the few CEOs in a given year who, whether by innate brilliance or by dumb luck, end up earning astronomical salaries. Those big paydays reset the baseline expectations for everyone else.
This isn’t just an American problem. Nor is it primarily a case of boards being helplessly in thrall to a company’ s executives. Boards are far more independent of management than they used to be, and it’s notable that a CEO hired from outside a company—typically gets 20 to 25 per cent more than an inside candidate. The real issues are subtler, though no less insidious. Some boards remain convinced of what Elson calls "superstar theory": they think that CEOs can work their magic anywhere, and must be overpaid to stay. In addition, Elson said, "if you pay below average, it makes it look as if you’d hired a below-average CEO, and what board wants that?"
Transparent pricing has perverse effects in other fields. In a host of recent cases, public disclosure of the prices that hospitals charge for various procedures has ended up driving prices up rather than down. And the psychological causes in both situations seem similar. We tend to be uneasy about bargaining in situations where the stakes are very high: do you want the guy doing your neurosurgery, or running your company, to be offering discounts? Better, in the event that something goes wrong, to be able to tell yourself that you spent all you could. And overspending is always easier when you’ re spending someone else’ s money. Corporate board members are disbursing shareholder funds; most patients have insurance to foot the bill.
Sunlight is supposed to be the best disinfectant. But there’ s something naive about the new SEC rule, which presumes that full disclosure will embarrass companies enough to restrain executive pay. As Elson told me, "People who can ask to be paid a hundred million dollars are beyond embarrassment. " More important, as long as the system for setting pay is broken, more disclosure makes things worse instead of better. We don’t need more information. We need boards of directors to step up and set pay themselves, instead of outsourcing the job to their peers. The rest of us don’ t get to live in Lake Wobegon. CEOs shouldn’t, either.
According to the passage, the rapid increase in executive compensation______.
选项
A、is solidly based on their contribution to companies’ development
B、leads to the huge disparity between the top and the middle in income
C、should be immediately stopped under regulatory reforms
D、will play a more important role in promoting company’s profit margins
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/uxSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Therewasnoenmitybetweenus,sowewereabletoreachanagreementonthesaleoftheproperty.
PhilanthropyIthasbecomeanAmericantraditionthatthosewhoattaingreatwealthreturnsomeofittothepublicthrough
Onthe________inthecountryside,thereareonlyone-tenthasmanydoctorsasthereareinthecity.
They’veliftedatwo-year-longeconomic________onthecountry.
Listentothefollowingpassage.WriteinEnglishashortsummaryofaround150-200wordsofwhatyouhaveheard.Youwillhear
StevenAveryfaceslifeimprisonforarapeofayoungwoman18yearsago.
Thewavelengthsoflightandradiowaves,unlikehighenergygammaradiation,aremuchshorter.
Theeconomyurgesthegovernmenttotakemeasurestocountertheinflationandloweringsalaries.
Wastingwoodisaseriousprobleminconservingtheresources,whicharedistributedunevenlyandaffectedbyothernaturalfact
A、Aschoolteacher.B、AclerktothecurrentChiefJustice.C、Anappealscourtjudge.D、Aextremistzealot.C
随机试题
设F(u,υ)可微,且Fu’≠Fυ’,z(x,y)是由方程F(ax+bz,ay—bz)=0(b≠0)所确定的隐函数,求
A脂蛋白变性B胞质内残留的RNA变性C脂肪变性D核碎裂或溶解后的残余物E异常溶酶体豪焦小体
患者,男性,36岁。反复右上腹痛、寒战、黄疸5年,此次发病后黄疸持续不退。体检示:体温39.5℃,脉搏122次/分钟,血压125/85mmHg。右上腹压痛,肌紧张。实验室检查:WBC15.5×109/L,中性粒细胞0.85。血清总胆红素132μmol/L
某学校附近最近发生系列抢劫学生财物的案件,公安干警经过推理判断,该系列抢劫案应该是由与本学校有一定关系的人所为。最终该系列抢劫案成功告破,果然是由该校的肄业生王某所为。公安干警所用的是哪一种推理?
市级商服中心()。
单位负责人必须重视和加强本单位会计人员的道德建设,在任用会计人员时,应当审查会计人员的(),选择业务素质高、职业道德好、无不良记录的人员从事会计工作。
劳动合同在订立和履行的过程中,双方的地位都是平等的。()
有人说,这是一个“监督与谩骂齐飞的时代”。那些与“坏消息”同步出现的质疑、反对、批评乃至批判的声音,有时确实切中时弊,直指要害;有时却不过是在逞口舌之快或显意气之争,其中不乏语言暴力、恶意中伤甚至不明所以的愤恨。有研究者指出,在“坏消息”舆论场中
一、注意事项1.所有题目一律使用现代汉语作答,用其他语言作答不得分;作答时使用黑色字迹的钢笔或签字笔,铅笔作答不得分。2.请仔细阅读给定资料内容,然后按照后面提出的“申论要求”作答。二、给定资料1.尽管官方并不认可中小企业“倒闭潮”这一说法,但现实
【26】【31】
最新回复
(
0
)