首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Evaluating Speaking I. What to evaluate A. ______【T1】______ targets: — the individual sounds — stressed and weak sounds in words
Evaluating Speaking I. What to evaluate A. ______【T1】______ targets: — the individual sounds — stressed and weak sounds in words
admin
2016-10-21
15
问题
Evaluating Speaking
I. What to evaluate
A. ______【T1】______
targets:
— the individual sounds
— stressed and weak sounds in words and speech
—______and intonation patterns【T2】______
standard:
a typical listener’s______【T3】______
B. rules of language
rules: structure, lexis and discourse
evaluator: providing suitable tasks and a suitable______【T4】______
targets:
-______【T5】______
— grammatical structure
-______【T6】______
— etc.
C. ______devices【T7】______
targets: use of eye contact and facial expression, gestures
problems with evaluation: standards and______【T8】______
D. communicative functions
targets: the ability to choose
— specific______【T9】______
— intonation and stress
— changes in______【T10】______
— etc. for the purpose of communication
evaluator: observation and comparison against a standard
E. ______【T11】______
targets: the ability to use
— formal and informal language
— the degree of______【T12】______
understanding of conversational principals and rules
evaluator: providing suitable tasks which recreate______【T13】______
such as status and age
II. How to evaluate
A. the use of an effective format for evaluation
to______various elements【T14】______
B. reducing the impact of emotional factors
C. practical concerns around available resources
D. ______【T15】______
III. Conclusion
【T2】
In this section you will hear a mini-lecture. You will hear the mini-lecture ONCE ONLY. While listening to the mini-lecture, please complete the gap-filling task on ANSWER SHEET ONE and write NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS for each gap. Make sure the word(s)you fill in is(are)both grammatically and semantically acceptable. You may use the blank sheet for note-taking.
You have THIRTY seconds to preview the gap-filling task.
(a thirty-second interval)
Now listen to the mini-lecture. When it is over, you will be given THREE minutes to check your work.
Evaluating Speaking
Good evening. Last time, we looked at what a speaker needs to be able to do to use spoken English as an effective form of communication. In today’s lecture, we’ll look at whether these different elements can be evaluated formally, and what ways there are to do this. Now let us start by considering which elements of speech can be evaluated, and which cannot — or should not.
So my first question is: what can we evaluate?
First, phonological features. Speakers need to be able to produce the phonological features of speech well enough to be understood, so it is fundamental that these are included in evaluation in some way. Things such as the individual sounds, stressed and weak sounds in words and speech, rhythm and intonation patterns are easy to elicit and identify. We can then measure them against a standard based on whether we can understand them or not, or perhaps more accurately, whether a typical listener could.
Second, rules of language. Speakers need to be able to understand and obey the rules of structure, lexis, and discourse when they speak. Again, this is easy to evaluate through observation, although we need to start thinking now about providing the speaker with suitable tasks and a suitable context, e. g. in interaction with other speakers. Observing the speaker, we can ask questions such as:
Is the speaker choosing the right vocabulary? Does it make sense? Is it formal enough? Does it collocate with other words correctly?
Is the speaker following rules about grammatical structure?
Is it coherent and cohesive?
Third, paralinguistic devices. It is clear that speakers need to be able to understand and use paralinguistic devices, as they are an essential part of communication, and competence includes the ability to manage these devices. We can convey an enormous amount with use of eye contact and facial expression, for example, and gestures work in the same way as linguistic communication. However, there are problems. For example, it is difficult to evaluate many of these features explicitly. The speaker’s use of gestures, expressions and verbal tools such as noises can be observed, but can we establish a standard of correct use? Eye contact, movement of the body and head, and posture all send powerful messages, but how do we describe them in a framework for evaluation? How do we elicit them in a controlled form? In addition to this, we may feel that it is not appropriate to evaluate this area at all as part of spoken language testing, and that the best way to address these may be under another heading, such as intercultural communicative competence. This then means evaluating them separately, using very different techniques.
Fourth, Communicative functions. Speakers need to be able to recognise, understand and use the communicative functions of speech. This means that speakers actually communicate with their choices of vocabulary and grammar, intonation and stress, changes in volume and tone, etc. These features can be evaluated through observation of the speaker’s performance and comparison against a standard. As we are evaluating communicative functions, it is relevant to evaluate a speaker from this perspective, for example by asking:
Does the speaker use intonation and stress effectively to support their message?
Does the speaker manage volume and tone appropriately to support communication?
Does the speaker use pauses, repetition and noises appropriately to support communication?
Fifth, social meaning. Speakers need to be able to understand and use the social meaning of speech and many aspects of this can be evaluated formally. We can for example assess the ability to use formal and informal language, and the degree of directness, by using suitable tasks which recreate social factors such as status and age. The speaker’s understanding of conversational principles and rules can be observed in interaction with others, e. g. in a group task. Connotations of language can be included as part of evaluation of use of vocabulary.
Then, my second question is: how do we evaluate?
As we can see, most aspects of spoken language can be evaluated formally. The challenge is to find a form for testing which enables us to do so. An effective format for evaluation should enable us to isolate and analyse various elements, possibly under a series of general headings, but also use tasks which allow us to measure the speaker’s communicative competence in general. Clearly if we want to measure a speaker’s language we want them to perform to their best ability, so we also need to consider the best ways to reduce the impact of emotional factors such as stress and nerves. Finally, we need to think about practical concerns around available resources, such as time, examiners, equipment if we are going to record the speaker, and space.
There are a wide range of test types and elicitation available. If we limit them to formal evaluation by an examiner, as opposed for example to self-assessment or informal evaluation during classes, the most common ways for a teacher or examiner to evaluate speaking formally include: natural conversation, joint tasks, presentations and descriptions, role-plays, interviews, using visual prompts, retelling a story, reading aloud, etc. For most of the time, they will be used in a mixed way.
Today, we have reviewed which elements of spoken language can be evaluated and what kinds of questions we can ask when we consider each. These questions measure communicative competence, in other words, with the underlying message of " How good is the speaker at communicating?" We have also considered some of the many types of tests available. These need to be matched to testing aims, types of candidates and the resources available. Next time, we will look at three formal speaking tests, identify how they work, and consider their effectiveness. Thank you for your attention.
选项
答案
rhythm
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/vA7O777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Psycholinguisticsisthestudyofthepsychologicalprocessesinvolvedinlanguage.Psycholinguistsstudyunderstanding,produc
TheonlyoneglottalinEnglishis______.
Thequestionofwhetherwarisinevitableisonewhichhasconcernedmanygreatwriters.Beforeconsideringthequestion,itwi
Thequestionofwhetherwarisinevitableisonewhichhasconcernedmanygreatwriters.Beforeconsideringthequestion,itwi
Whatkindoftoneisusedwhenwhatissaidincludesconnotativemeaning?
ResearchesfoundallofthefollowingfunctionsaboutworkingoutEXCEPT______.
他饮他的花酒,我喝我的清茶。人生,需要一种境界:自我安定。面对别人的成功和荣耀,我喝我的清茶。我明白那掌声已有所属,匆匆忙忙赶过去,不会有成功等着你。还是自己再创业绩吧,跟着别人永远只能摸着成功的尾巴。凡事不逃避,我喝我的清茶,荷花居污泥而不染,
笼里养着两只母鸡,一只爱唱,另一只喜静。主人根据母鸡下蛋之后报唱的现象,以为所有的蛋都是那只唱鸡产的,因此很偏爱它,捉的蟑螂也专喂给它吃。但日子一久,秘密揭穿了,原来那只唱鸡下蛋很少,而不叫的那只却一天一个,且蛋刚落地就一声不响地离开鸡窝,由那只唱鸡站在蛋
Forgetfit,tannedandsporty—thenewgenerationofAustraliansisfastbecomingfat,paleandlazy.Aloveofjunkfood,tele
PASSAGETHREEAccordingtoFransdeWaal,whatdoes"one-on-onemorality"govern?
随机试题
某商场系增值税一般纳税人。适用增值税税率为17%。2010年春节期间为进行促销,该商场规定购物每满200元积10分,不足200元部分不积分,积分可在一年内兑换成与积分等值的商品。某顾客购买了售价为5850元(含增值税850元)、成本为4000元的服装,预计
按我国消费税制度规定,下列商品中,属于消费税课税对象的是
李方为平昌公司董事长。债务人姜呈向平昌公司偿还40万元时,李方要其将该款打到自己指定的个人账户。随即李方又将该款借给刘黎,借期一年,年息12%。下列哪些表述是正确的?
如题30图所示,三台同型号水泵在工作环境相同的情况下并联运行,并联时泵的效率点为()。
背景资料:某施工单位承建了一段二级公路路基工程,其中K3+220~K3+650为高填方路堤。路基填方高度最高为21.2m,地面以下有约6m的软土层。施工单位采用强夯处理地基,采用水平分层填筑路堤。高填方路堤横断面示意图如图1所示。
()是从消防安全管理的空间范围上看,消防安全管理活动具有全方位的特征。在日常生产和生活中,可燃物、助燃物和着火源可以说是无处不在,凡是有需要用火或是容易形成燃烧条件的场所,都是容易造成火灾的场所,也就是消防安全管理活动应该涉及的场所。
小红证明命题和定理时,需要将数字符号和概念组合起来运用。这是()
下列各句所涉及的年龄,由小到大排列正确的一项是()①余自束发读书轩中②豆蔻梢头二月初③既加冠,益慕圣贤之道④年近知命,位止方州⑤行行向不惑,淹留遂无成
InalabinOxfordUniversity’sexperimentalpsychologydepartment,researcherRoiCohenKadoshistestingarelativelynewbrai
在考生文件夹下有student(学生)、course(课程)和score(选课成绩)3个表,利用SQL语句完成如下操作:(1)查询每门课程的最高分,要求得到的信息包括"课程名称"和"分数",将查询结果存储到max表中(字段名是"课程名称"和"分数"),并
最新回复
(
0
)