2. 外语
  3. Airline Alliances Cooperative competition. Competitive cooperation. Confused? Airline alliances have travelers scratching their

Airline Alliances Cooperative competition. Competitive cooperation. Confused? Airline alliances have travelers scratching their

admin2013-08-12  49
问题                         Airline Alliances
Cooperative competition. Competitive cooperation. Confused? Airline alliances have travelers scratching their heads over what’s going on in the skies. Some folks view alliances as a blessing to travelers, offering seamless travel, reduced fares and enhanced frequent-flyer benefits. Others see a conspiracy of big businesses, causing decreased competition, increased fares and fewer choices. Whatever your opinion is, there are no escaping airline alliances: the marketing hype is unrelenting, with each of the two mega-groupings. Oneworld and Star Alliance promote themselves as the best choice for all travelers. And, even if you turn away from their ads, chances are they will figure in any of your travel plans.
    But why, after years of often ferocious competition, have airlines decided to band together? Let’s just say the timing is mutually convenient. North American Airlines, having exhausted all means of earning customer loyalty at home, have been looking for ways to reach out to foreign flyers. Asian carriers are still hurting from the region—-the wide economic downturn that began two years ago— just when some of the airlines were taking delivery of new aircraft. Alliances also allow carriers to cut costs and increase profits by pooling manpower resources on the ground(rather than each airline maintaining its own ground crew)and code-sharing—the practice of two partners selling tickets and operating only one aircraft.
    So alliances are terrific for airlines—but are they good for the passenger? Absolutely, say the airlines: think of the lounges, the joint FFP(frequent flyer programme)benefits, the round-the-world fares, and the global service networks. Then there is the promise of "seamless" travel: the ability to, say, travel from Singapore to Rome to New York to Rio de Janeiro, all on one ticket, without having to wait hours for connections or worry about your bags. Sounds Utopian? Peter Buecking, Cathay Pacific’s Director of Sales and Marketing, thinks that seamless travel is still evolving. "The key to seamlessness rests in infrastructure and information sharing. We are working on this. " Henry Ma, spokesperson for Star Alliance in Hong Kong, lists some of the other benefits for customers: "Global travelers have an easier time making connections and planning their itineraries. " Ma claims alliances also assure passengers consistent service standards.
    Critics of alliances say the much touted benefits to the customer are mostly pie in the sky, that alliances are all about reducing costs for the airlines, rationalizing services and running joint marketing programmes. Consumer Report’s Senior Editor Jeff Blyskal says the promotional ballyhoo over alliances is much ado about nothing. "I don’t see much of a gain for consumers: alliances are just a marketing gimmick . Most airlines can not even get their own connections under control, let alone coordinate with another airline. "
    Blyskal believes alliances will ultimately result in decreased flight choices and increased costs for consumers. Instead of two airlines competing and each operating a flight on the same route at 70% capacity, the allied pair will share the route and run one full flight. Since fewer seats will be available, passengers will be obliged to pay more for tickets.
    The truth about alliances and their merits probably lies somewhere between the travel Utopia presented by the players, and the evil empires portrayed by their critics. And how much they affect you depends on what kind of traveler you are.
    Those who’ve already made the elite grade in the FFP of a major airline stand to benefit the most when it joints an alliance: then they enjoy the FFP perks and advantages on any and all of the member carriers. For example, if you are a Marco Polo Club "gold" member of Cathay Pacific’s Asia Miles FFP, you will automatically be treated as a valuable customer by all members of Oneworld, of which Cathay Pacific is a member.
    For those who haven’t made the top grade in any FFP, alliances might be a way of simplifying the earning of frequent flyer miles. For example, I belong to United Airline’s Mileage Plus and generally fly less than 25 000 miles a year. But I earn miles with every flight I take on Star Alliance member— All Nippon Airways and Thai Airways.
     (A) If you fly less than I do, you might be smarter to stay out of the FFP game altogether.(B) The only real benefit infrequent flyers can draw from an alliance is an inexpensive round-the-world fare.(C)The bottom lines for all the marketing hype, alliances aren’t all things to all people —but everybody can get some benefit out of them.(D)
Which of the following is NOT a perceived advantage of alliances?
选项 A、Baggage allowance.
B、Passenger comfort.
C、Convenience.
D、Quality.
答案A
解析 本题为正误判断题，考查考生根据文章中阐明的信息，判断什么信息是正确的，什么信息是错误的，什么信息是文章中没有提到的。题目问：下列哪一个选项不被认为是航空集团的优势?根据文章第三段第二、三句“Absolutely，say the airlines：think of the lounges，the joint FFP(frequent flyer programme)benefits，the round—the—world fares，and the global servicenetworks．Then there is the promise of‘seamless’travel…without having to wait…”可知，休闲室、为频繁飞行者提供的优惠、环球优惠票价、全球服务网，还有对联飞旅游所做的承诺等，说明选项B、C、D是正确的，而选项A文章并没有提及，故选A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/vEfO777K
0

托福（TOEFL）

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)