首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
All over the world, more boys are born than girls. Evolutionary biologists believe that this is because boys are more likely to
All over the world, more boys are born than girls. Evolutionary biologists believe that this is because boys are more likely to
admin
2012-03-23
57
问题
All over the world, more boys are born than girls. Evolutionary biologists believe that this is because boys are more likely to die at a given age than are their female contemporaries. The imbalance at birth thus means that the sex ratio balances at the age when people are reproducing. But for decades there has been a puzzling trend in the boy. girl ratio. In Britain, as well as in the United States and Canada, the proportion of boys being born is dropping. No one knows why, although it has been suggested, somewhat controversially, that the trend is due to chemical pollutants that are mimicking the effects of sex hormones.
And yet there is another recent trend that may have something to do with it. During the same period, the proportion of single mothers has been increasing. The reasons {or this are less puzzling, but as the Italian nominee to the European commission, Rocco Battalions, found out when he apparently suggested that single mothers were not very good as parents, it is no less controversial. The question is, could the two trends be linked? Can household arrangements affect the human sex ratio?
According to Karen Norberg, of the National Bureau of Economic Research in Cambridge, Massachusetts, they can Dr. Norberg found that the chance a woman giving birth to a boy rather than a girl is higher if she has been living with a man before the child was conceived. To be specific, for parents who were living together, boys were born 51. 50% of the time, while when the parents were not cohabiting only 49. 90% of births were male. This difference may seem small, but statistically it is highly significant, which suggests it is the result of evolution.
Actually, as with so much else in biology, Charles Darwin got there first. In "The Descent of Man", he referred to studies showing that among children born out of wedlock there were more girls than boys. Dr. Nordberg’s work reinforces the point, and also shows that it is not formal marriage, but actual cohabitation, that is the decisive factor. What neither Darwin’s nor Dr. Nordberg’s work shows, though, is why.
There are some clues. In work on other mammals, researchers have found an association between hormones, the frequency of copulation, and the sex of the of fspring. In other words, there is a way the body might "know" if it is cohabiting with someone by the amount of sex it is getting. It is also known that a woman’s hormonal motivation to have sex is highest on the day of ovulation, and that sex on that day is more likely to result in a girl. Couples who live apart, and therefore probably have intercourse less often, may be more likely to do so when the motivation is highest—resulting in a girl.
This chain of reasoning, though, provides only what workers in the field call a proximate cause. What is needed for a complete explanation is an ultimate—evolutionary—cause. It is easy to speculate. Perhaps same-sex children are easier for a lone parent to rear. Perhaps parents pass on different kinds of benefits to same-sex offspring and opposite-sex offspring. Perhaps a father helps his son to learn sex-specific skills. Perhaps boys are simply more costly to raise than girls, and would thus overtax the resources of a lone parent. However, a more controversial possibility is that—in a Darwinian sense only —Mr. Battalion is right that two parents are sometimes better than one.
It is well established, in both humans and other species, that successful males have lots of offspring, while unsuccessful ones have few or none. Females, by contrast, show a smaller range of reproductive output, with most having some offspring, but none having as many as the most successful males. The upshot is that it makes evolutionary sense to have sons when circumstances favour them becoming big, strong, clever and handsome (and therefore attractive to women), but -when they do not, it is better for a woman to have daughters, most of whom will find a mate even in tough times. In the case of humans, circumstances favoring the raising of strong, healthy children could include having two parents around, since humans are unusual among mammals in that fathers are often involved in parental care.
Of course, even if this evolutionary explanation of Dr. Nordberg’s result does turn out to be correct, it probably does not carry any lessons for the modern world. Such biological patterns would have been established hundreds of thousands—or possibly millions—of years ago. Bringing up children alone in a rich, industrialized society is a rather different proposition from bringing them up in a hunter-gatherer band, and there is no reason to suppose they would he at a disadvantage now. Except, perhaps, that with a surplus of women around, it will he even harder than it is today for a girl to find a suitable husband when she grows up.
It can be inferred from the passage that
选项
A、Rocco Buttiglione’s point has provoked little controversy.
B、married couples tend to bear more boys than the unmarried.
C、Karen Nordberg is a world-famous biologist in the USA.
D、Charles Darwin contributed to many biological explanations.
答案
D
解析
推断题。第四段首句指出“Actually,as with so much else in biology,Charles Darwin got there first.”,之后具体提及在其《人类起源》一书中提到“among children born out of wedlock there were more girls than boys”。从as with SO much else in biology可以判断,达尔文对很多生物学现象都做出过解释,故[D]为答案。第二段第三句指出“Rocco Battalion,found out when he apparently suggested that single mothers were not very good as parents,it is no less controversial.”,句中的no less controversial意为“同前面的这种趋势应归咎于化学污染物的观点一样存有争议”,[A]与之矛盾,排除;第四段第三句“Dr.Norberg’s work reinforces the point。and also shows that it is not formal marriage,but actual cohabitation,that is the decisive factor.”表明生育男孩多少取决于是否同居而不是足否结婚,排除[B];第三段首句提到“According to Karen Norberg.of the National Bureau of Economic Research in Cambridge,Massachusetts,they can.”,这里只是简要介绍了Karen Norberg的身份,没有涉及他是否世界闻名,排除[C]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/vIiO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
WhatisfearedasfailureinAmericansocietyis,aboveall,aloneness.Andalonenessisterrifyingbecauseitmeansthatthere
FivePowerKeysforLeadershipSuccessManypeoplehopetobecomeasuccessfulleader.Infact,thereare5powerkeyswhich
Scienceisacumulativebodyofknowledgeaboutthenaturalworld,obtainedbytheapplicationofaparticularmethodpractised
Exceptatnight,theyhardlyeverhavetimetogether.HeoftensitsaloneinthehousewaitingforJulie-Julietocomehome.It
Themostdamningthingthatcanbesaidabouttheworld’sbest-endowedandrichestcountryisthatitisnotonlynottheleader
TheSkillsofEssayWritingWritingcanhelpyoutogetyourthoughtsclear,toexploresomeofyourideasandto【1】yourself
TheRiseofRPHistoricalreasonsReceivedPronunciation(RP)wasoriginallyassociatedwitha【1】______spokenintheregion
TheNationalDayoftheUnitedStatesisassociatedwith______.
Doppelganger,aSanFrancisco-basedstartupislaunchingavirtualworldtodaythat’spartnightclub,partbillboard,Thesteady
我同书籍,即将分离。我虽非英雄,颇有垓下之感,即无可奈何。这些书,都是在全国解放以后,来到我家的。最初零零碎碎,中间成套成批。有的来自京沪,有的来自苏杭。最初,囊中羞涩,也曾交臂相失。中间也曾一掷百金,稍有豪气。总之,时历三十余年,我同它们,可称
随机试题
审美意象是用来表达某种抽象的观念或者哲理的艺术形象,它是艺术家在构思过程中,将自己的审美情感、审美认识与客观的事物相融合,并以一定的艺术表达方式呈现出来的内心视像。根据上述定义,下列不属于审美意象的是:
实时频谱分析仪可用于非重复性且持续时间很短(如爆炸)的信号分析。
Lifeasawomaninthecolonial(殖民的)Americaseemsquitedifferentfromitistoday.Womenwereconsideredinferiortomen,a
社会主义现代化建设中,人民政协的基本职能是
王某涉嫌虐待被监管人罪,侦查终结后被移送下一诉讼程序,关于本案的补充侦查说法正确的是:()
从事导游业务,日常的接待礼仪包括()。
崔老师在绘画教学中,发现很多学生不敢动笔,于是要求每位同学在一张A4纸上随意进行抽象表现,结果每个学生都非常有信心,十分投入地大胆表现。这种教学活动属于()。
行政问责
设函数(n为正整数),则f(x)有().
How’sthisforacoincidence?CharlesDarwinandAbrahamLincolnwereborninthesameyear,onthesameday:Feb.12,1809.Alt
最新回复
(
0
)