首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In politics, in the courts, even on the ubiquitous TV talk show, it is good form to pick an intellectual fight. People attack ea
In politics, in the courts, even on the ubiquitous TV talk show, it is good form to pick an intellectual fight. People attack ea
admin
2016-01-30
34
问题
In politics, in the courts, even on the ubiquitous TV talk show, it is good form to pick an intellectual fight. People attack each other — hurl insults, even — and it counts as logical argument. I cannot understand it. It seems that our society favors a kind of ritualized aggression. Everywhere you look, in newspapers and on television, issues are presented using the terminology of war and conflict. We hear of battles, duels and disputes. We see things in terms of winners and losers, victors and victims. The problem is society’s unquestioning belief in the advantages of the debate as a way of solving disagreements, even proving right from wrong.
Our brainwashing begins early at school, when the brightest pupils are co-opted onto the debating system. They get there because they can think up a good argument to support their case. Once on the debate team, they learn that they earn bonus points for the skill with which they verbally attack, or insult, the opposing team. They win if they can successfully convince the audience that they are right, even if the case they are arguing is clearly consensual. They do this by proving themselves to be stronger, brighter, more outrageous, even. The training in this adversarial approach continues at our tertiary institutions. The standard way to present an academic paper, for instance, is to take up an opposing argument to something expressed by another academic. The paper must set out to prove the other person wrong. This is not at all the same thing as reading the original paper with an open mind and discovering that you disagree with it.
The reverence for the adversarial approach spills over into all areas of life. Instead of answering their critics, politicians learn to sidestep negative comments and turn the point around to an attack on accusers. Defense lawyers argue the case for their clients even when they suspect they may be guilty. And ordinary people use the same tactics — just listen to your teenager next time you pull him up for coming home late. You can be sure a stream of abuse will flow about your own time — keeping, your irritating habits, your history of bad parenting.
Unfortunately, the smarter your kid, the better his or her argument against you will be. You’ll be upset, but you’ll comfort yourself that those teenage monsters of yours will one day turn into mature, though adults who can look after themselves — by which you mean, of course, they will be able to argue their way out of sticky situations.
It’s not that you should never use angry words, or take up a position in opposition to someone or something. There are certainly times when one should take a stand, and in such cases strong words are quite appropriate; if you witness injustice, for instance, or feel passionately about another’s folly. Mockery — so cruel when practiced on the innocent — can be very useful in such situations. There is no better way to bring down a tyrant than to mock him mercilessly.
What I dislike is the automatic assumption most people have when it comes to disagreements: they should attack, abuse, preferably overpower their opponent, at whatever the cost. The approach is to so ingrained that "compromise" has become a dirty word. We feel quality if we are conciliatory rather than confrontational. We have trained ourselves, or been brainwashed into believing, that to be pleasant is a sign of weakness.
But just think how easy it can be to persuade a "difficult" person to be considerate of you or your wished when you are pleasant to them, and unthreatening. Give them a way out of a potentially aggressive situation without losing face, and they will oblige you willingly.
Discuss a subject without taking an adversarial position and you will find the other person happy to explore the possibilities with you. I ’m prepared to bet on it. You’ll get closer to the truth of the matter than you would by going to each other hammer and tongs.
The commonly accepted way to write an academic paper is to______.
选项
A、prove right from wrong
B、confront an existing theory
C、discuss with an open mind
D、find an untouched topic
答案
B
解析
细节事实题。根据题干中的关键词academic paper与原文第二段第七句为重现,对原文进行定位。原文此句中is to后的内容即为答案,原文中的opposing argument,another academic分别与选项B中的confront,existing theory对应。故答案为B。选项A与第二段第八句相似,但原文是指要挑剔别人的观点,结合下一句可以进一步确定这并不是真的要明辨是非,因此选项A不正确:选项C在第二段尾句有提到,但这并不是大多数人采取的方式,所以选项C不符合题意;选项D的内容在原文没有提及。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/vhGO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Inrecentyears,therehasbeenasteadyassaultonsaltfromthedoctors:saltisbadforyouregardlessofyourhealth.Politi
SoonafterBeijinggraduatestudentGangDong-chunlandedinTaiwanlastyeartoresearchitspoliticaldevelopment,theUnited
(浙江大学2010年试题)ThecharacterofEuropeaneducationdemandsthatthestudentdevelop【1】andsocialindividuality.TheAmerican
(上海理工大学2006年试题)Inatelephonesurveyofmorethan2,000adults,21%saidtheybelievedthesunrevolved(旋转)aroundtheearth
(浙江大学2008年试题)Theenergycrisis,whichisbeingfeltaroundtheworld,hasdramatizedhowthecarelessuseoftheearth’sre
Theyhavealwaysregardedamanof______andfairnessasareliablefriend.
Animportantconsequencearisesbecausethesocialsecurityprogramispurelypay-as-you-gofinanced,_____mostpensionplans,at
Researcherswhoareunfamiliarwiththeculturalandethnicgroupstheyarestudyingmusttakeextraprecautionstoshedanybia
Friedfoodshavelongbeenfrownedupon.Nevertheless,theskilletisaboutourhandiestandmostusefulpieceofkitchenequipm
It’sallannualback-to-schoolroutine.Onemorningyouwavegoodbye,andthat【C1】______eveningyou’reburningthelate-night
随机试题
按对象的不同,可将需要分为()
关于雌、孕激素生物合成与代谢,以下哪项是错误的
【案例】患者女,17岁,头痛、咳嗽伴发热1周来诊,查体:T38.0℃,咽赤,右肺背侧下部可闻及小水泡音。为明确诊断,该患者还需完善哪些检查
晕针的主要原因是滞针的主要原因是
公民的三大基本权利是()
美国对货运代理行业及无船承运人(NVOCC)实行营业许可管理制度,从事货运代理及无船承运业务的企业,必须进行注册登记,并需交纳一定的保证金。因此,我国企业若在美国从事国际货运代理业务或无船承运业务,按规定应提供()美元的保证金。
被誉为“中国17世纪的工艺百科全书”,并系统科学地总结了16世纪末到17世纪中叶的农业和手工业生产技术的著作是()。
请简要阐述你曾经亲自负责的一项工作,你采取了什么方法来保证工作顺利完成,这些方法对你在新岗位工作的有什么帮助?
有些基因使人们总的来说感到快乐一些或者悲伤一些。这句话的意思是()。
(2012年国家.79)草地上插了若干根旗杆,已知旗杆的高度在1至5米之间,且任意两根旗杆的距离都不超过它们高度差的10倍。如果用一根绳子将所有旗杆都围进去,在不知旗杆数量和位置的情况下,最少需要准备多少米长的绳子?()
最新回复
(
0
)