首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In politics, in the courts, even on the ubiquitous TV talk show, it is good form to pick an intellectual fight. People attack ea
In politics, in the courts, even on the ubiquitous TV talk show, it is good form to pick an intellectual fight. People attack ea
admin
2016-01-30
35
问题
In politics, in the courts, even on the ubiquitous TV talk show, it is good form to pick an intellectual fight. People attack each other — hurl insults, even — and it counts as logical argument. I cannot understand it. It seems that our society favors a kind of ritualized aggression. Everywhere you look, in newspapers and on television, issues are presented using the terminology of war and conflict. We hear of battles, duels and disputes. We see things in terms of winners and losers, victors and victims. The problem is society’s unquestioning belief in the advantages of the debate as a way of solving disagreements, even proving right from wrong.
Our brainwashing begins early at school, when the brightest pupils are co-opted onto the debating system. They get there because they can think up a good argument to support their case. Once on the debate team, they learn that they earn bonus points for the skill with which they verbally attack, or insult, the opposing team. They win if they can successfully convince the audience that they are right, even if the case they are arguing is clearly consensual. They do this by proving themselves to be stronger, brighter, more outrageous, even. The training in this adversarial approach continues at our tertiary institutions. The standard way to present an academic paper, for instance, is to take up an opposing argument to something expressed by another academic. The paper must set out to prove the other person wrong. This is not at all the same thing as reading the original paper with an open mind and discovering that you disagree with it.
The reverence for the adversarial approach spills over into all areas of life. Instead of answering their critics, politicians learn to sidestep negative comments and turn the point around to an attack on accusers. Defense lawyers argue the case for their clients even when they suspect they may be guilty. And ordinary people use the same tactics — just listen to your teenager next time you pull him up for coming home late. You can be sure a stream of abuse will flow about your own time — keeping, your irritating habits, your history of bad parenting.
Unfortunately, the smarter your kid, the better his or her argument against you will be. You’ll be upset, but you’ll comfort yourself that those teenage monsters of yours will one day turn into mature, though adults who can look after themselves — by which you mean, of course, they will be able to argue their way out of sticky situations.
It’s not that you should never use angry words, or take up a position in opposition to someone or something. There are certainly times when one should take a stand, and in such cases strong words are quite appropriate; if you witness injustice, for instance, or feel passionately about another’s folly. Mockery — so cruel when practiced on the innocent — can be very useful in such situations. There is no better way to bring down a tyrant than to mock him mercilessly.
What I dislike is the automatic assumption most people have when it comes to disagreements: they should attack, abuse, preferably overpower their opponent, at whatever the cost. The approach is to so ingrained that "compromise" has become a dirty word. We feel quality if we are conciliatory rather than confrontational. We have trained ourselves, or been brainwashed into believing, that to be pleasant is a sign of weakness.
But just think how easy it can be to persuade a "difficult" person to be considerate of you or your wished when you are pleasant to them, and unthreatening. Give them a way out of a potentially aggressive situation without losing face, and they will oblige you willingly.
Discuss a subject without taking an adversarial position and you will find the other person happy to explore the possibilities with you. I ’m prepared to bet on it. You’ll get closer to the truth of the matter than you would by going to each other hammer and tongs.
The commonly accepted way to write an academic paper is to______.
选项
A、prove right from wrong
B、confront an existing theory
C、discuss with an open mind
D、find an untouched topic
答案
B
解析
细节事实题。根据题干中的关键词academic paper与原文第二段第七句为重现,对原文进行定位。原文此句中is to后的内容即为答案,原文中的opposing argument,another academic分别与选项B中的confront,existing theory对应。故答案为B。选项A与第二段第八句相似,但原文是指要挑剔别人的观点,结合下一句可以进一步确定这并不是真的要明辨是非,因此选项A不正确:选项C在第二段尾句有提到,但这并不是大多数人采取的方式,所以选项C不符合题意;选项D的内容在原文没有提及。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/vhGO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
(复旦大学2009年试题)Hereisagreatironyof21st-centuryglobalpublichealth;Whilemanyhundredsofmillionsofpeoplelackade
(浙江大学2010年试题)ThecharacterofEuropeaneducationdemandsthatthestudentdevelop【1】andsocialindividuality.TheAmerican
(上海理工大学2006年试题)Inatelephonesurveyofmorethan2,000adults,21%saidtheybelievedthesunrevolved(旋转)aroundtheearth
(上海理工大学2006年试题)Inatelephonesurveyofmorethan2,000adults,21%saidtheybelievedthesunrevolved(旋转)aroundtheearth
AreweatthebeginningofanotherAgeofExploration?Perhapsevenmoreimportant,areweatthebeginningof【C1】______AgeofC
Onlytwocountriesintheadvancedworldprovidenoguaranteeforpaidleavefromworktocareforanewbornchild.Lastspring
Printmakingisthegenerictermforanumberofprocesses,ofwhichwoodcutandengravingaretwoprimeexamples.Printsaremad
Theideaofhumanoidrobotsisnotnew.TheyhavebeenpartoftheimaginativelandscapeeversinceKarlCapek,aCzechwriter,
Don’tcallhimjustacollegeprofessor.Internetentrepreneur,TVpersonality,advisertopresidents,andfriendtotherichan
Don’tcallhimjustacollegeprofessor.Internetentrepreneur,TVpersonality,advisertopresidents,andfriendtotherichan
随机试题
燥咳的特点是
关于像片控制测量说法正确的是()。
西南地区某高速公路于2009年完成环评审批,2013年建成试运行,现拟开展竣工环境保护验收调查。该高速公路主线全长95km,双向四车道,其中KI段(K0-K62]长62km,位于平原微丘区,设计车速为100km/h,路基宽度为26m;KⅡ段(K62-K9
关于轻质隔墙说法不正确的是( )。
以下关于做市商和经纪人的区别,说法错误的是()。
读下图,某经线上点F,虚线为过该点的地面垂直线,Q1、Q2是F点夏至日两个不同时刻的太阳光线,且经线、虚线和太阳光线位于同一平面上。完成下列问题。若F点的地方时是世界标准时,则此时北京时间是()。
动景运动
英格兰有一童谣《起风了,小猫饿死了》:起风了,风把窗帘掀起来了。窗帘拍倒了花瓶,花瓶的水洒到地板上了。地板湿了,老婆婆滑倒了。她撞坏了椅子,木匠来修椅子了。木匠砍倒了一棵树,大树把面包师的房子砸坏了。面包师搬家了,老鼠没东西吃了。老鼠不来了——小猫饿死了。
12月7日,记者从山西高平市文物旅游局获悉,11月19—23日,在高平市羊头山上,省文物考古研究所专家发现一处仰韶文化遗址。遗址上,除发现大量陶片、瓦砾外,还发掘出一道东西走向的人工石砌围墙、石基础、古旧步道,经山西省考古研究所考古专家推测,这处遗址可能就
What’sSnowman?Itis______.WheredidMaryandSnowmanhaveaverybadfallthatday?Ina______.
最新回复
(
0
)