首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the United States, there is some disagreement (to say the least) over the risks and benefits .of nuclear power. There can be
In the United States, there is some disagreement (to say the least) over the risks and benefits .of nuclear power. There can be
admin
2011-02-11
101
问题
In the United States, there is some disagreement (to say the least) over the risks and benefits .of nuclear power. There can be no question that with our electrical power needs increasing rapidly, we cannot rely indefinitely on the earth’s remaining fossil fuel supply. The question is, can we safely shift our reliance to nuclear fission power plants—considering the present state of our knowledge and technology? The American public has, in the past few years, developed a rather strong consensus regarding this question. Nuclear power has fallen into disfavor. The risks seem too great, the reward too small—at least for the immediate future.
It is not likely that an explosion of the type produced by atomic bombs can occur in the kinds of nuclear reactors being used today. However, we still don’t know how close we came to a major tragedy at Three Mile Island. A far greater tragedy occurred at a nuclear plant at Chernobyl, in the Soviet Union’s Ukraine in 1986. The risks associated with nuclear power, however, are not always so spectacular. Some are of a far subtler nature. For example, radioactivity could be released into the environment from activities related to mining and processing nuclear fuel, from the transportation and recycling of the fuel and from storage of the radioactive wastes. We frequently hear of steam or gas leaks from the reactors themselves. ;And even the safest reactors normally leak small amounts of radiation into their immediate environment. (The problem with this is that there are no "safe" levels of radioactivity--only "acceptable" levels. )
We could probably greatly reduce the risks associated with nuclear power by simply exercising more care and common sense. There are numerous published accounts that attest to our carelessness, however. For example, it has been revealed that the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant in California was built on an earthquake fault line. At the WNP-2 plant in Washington State, the concrete contained air bubbles and pockets of water as well as shields that had been incorrectly welded. In 1981, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission inspected forty-three plants that were under construction and rated seven "below average" and thirty-six "average". None were rated even "above average".
Completely apart from the possibility of accidents, there is the unsolved problem of what to do with the radioactive wastes generated in the course of normal nuclear plant reactions. The problem is a tough one since such wastes can only be rendered safe by the passage of time. The waste radioactivity is .generated in the fuel system of the reactors because only a part of the fuel is fissionable and, for technical reasons, not all of the fissionable elements are spent. Much of the spent fuel materials removed from the reactor can be reused. However, some of the radioactive fuel in the spent elements cannot be removed, and this material adds to the radioactive waste.
We have already generated over 10,000 tons of nuclear waste, with another 47,000 tons expected by 19951 Most of the waste is in the form of fuel rods which are, for now, stored in baths filled with a solution of neutron-absorbing boric acid. The problem is that these are only temporary repositories and,’ unless new space is found, existing plants must begin closing for lack of space. The rods can be reprocessed, but the technology could lead to the fuel for nuclear weapons.
The reprocessing also leaves "high-level liquid waste" that must be stored. The prevailing idea at the moment is to dry the liquid and mix it with molten glass that, when it hardens, can be stored in tanks. Suggestions range from burying it in the Antarctic to sending it into space.
Which of the following risks occurs most frequently at nuclear power plants?
选项
A、Leakage of untreated nuclear wastes.
B、Explosions.
C、Earthquakes.
D、Gas or steam leaks.
答案
D
解析
此题旨在考查考生对文章中所叙述事实的记忆。第二段中作者主要讨论了核泄漏问题,并举例来证明这是目前核能使用存在的一个大问题。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/vsYO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Anassumptionissomethingtakenforgranted.Everyonemakesassumptions--youhavetoinordertosayanything.Asacriticalre
Specializationcanbeseenasaresponsetotheproblemofanincreasingaccumulationofscientificknowledge.Bysplittingupt
A、OnThursday.B、OnFriday.C、OnSaturday.D、OnSunday.B关于Mirspacestation的残骸坠落在太平洋上的时间,从“RemnantsofRussia’sMirspacestati
Accordingtotheconversation,anapplicationlettershould______.
Cyberia—InternetCafesEvaPascoeridestoworkonamotorbike.Herbusinesswardrobefeaturessuchitemsasblackleggings,
______referstoasociolinguisticsituationtwovarietiesofalanguageexistsidebysidethroughoutthecommunity,witheach
A、ItslocationforviewingintheworldB、itstimingonthecalendar.C、Itsmovementacrossthesky.D、Itsbeautifulscene.B对于这
WhenGermanyinvadedPoland,BritainandFrancedeclaredwaronGermany.ThentheU.S【1】______indebate.
Contrasttoresearchers’expectations,dysfunctionalfamilyrelationshipsandpoor
HowtheSmallpoxWarWasWonTheworld’slastknowncaseofsmallpoxwasreportedinSomalia,theHornofAfrica,inOctober
随机试题
在世界银行集团贷款中,用于解决借款国由于自然灾害所造成的经济困难的贷款形式是
烧伤后急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)诊断原则是
下列哪项不是甲状腺功能减退症的病因
应用强心苷期间严禁
影响桥体挠曲变形的最主要因素是
药材横切面上,外圈白色,中心黄色或淡黄色,习称“金井玉栏”,亦称“金心玉栏”。具有“金井玉栏”鉴别特征的药材是
ABC公司研制成功一台新产品,现在需要决定是否大规模投产,有关资料如下:(1)公司的销售部门预计,如果每台定价3万元,销售量每年可以达到10000台;销售量不会逐年上升,但价格可以每年提高2%。生产部门预计,变动制造成本每台2.1万元,每年增加2%;
《物业管理条例》规定业主在物业管理活动中享有的权利包括()
学习风格是学生在学习过程中形成的,具有不稳定性,并且有高低、好坏之分。()
Web服务器也可调用外部的程序对客户机的请求进行处理,当处理完毕后把结果再返给客户机,这些外部应用程序的作用类似于网络中的______。
最新回复
(
0
)