首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the United States, there is some disagreement (to say the least) over the risks and benefits .of nuclear power. There can be
In the United States, there is some disagreement (to say the least) over the risks and benefits .of nuclear power. There can be
admin
2011-02-11
94
问题
In the United States, there is some disagreement (to say the least) over the risks and benefits .of nuclear power. There can be no question that with our electrical power needs increasing rapidly, we cannot rely indefinitely on the earth’s remaining fossil fuel supply. The question is, can we safely shift our reliance to nuclear fission power plants—considering the present state of our knowledge and technology? The American public has, in the past few years, developed a rather strong consensus regarding this question. Nuclear power has fallen into disfavor. The risks seem too great, the reward too small—at least for the immediate future.
It is not likely that an explosion of the type produced by atomic bombs can occur in the kinds of nuclear reactors being used today. However, we still don’t know how close we came to a major tragedy at Three Mile Island. A far greater tragedy occurred at a nuclear plant at Chernobyl, in the Soviet Union’s Ukraine in 1986. The risks associated with nuclear power, however, are not always so spectacular. Some are of a far subtler nature. For example, radioactivity could be released into the environment from activities related to mining and processing nuclear fuel, from the transportation and recycling of the fuel and from storage of the radioactive wastes. We frequently hear of steam or gas leaks from the reactors themselves. ;And even the safest reactors normally leak small amounts of radiation into their immediate environment. (The problem with this is that there are no "safe" levels of radioactivity--only "acceptable" levels. )
We could probably greatly reduce the risks associated with nuclear power by simply exercising more care and common sense. There are numerous published accounts that attest to our carelessness, however. For example, it has been revealed that the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant in California was built on an earthquake fault line. At the WNP-2 plant in Washington State, the concrete contained air bubbles and pockets of water as well as shields that had been incorrectly welded. In 1981, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission inspected forty-three plants that were under construction and rated seven "below average" and thirty-six "average". None were rated even "above average".
Completely apart from the possibility of accidents, there is the unsolved problem of what to do with the radioactive wastes generated in the course of normal nuclear plant reactions. The problem is a tough one since such wastes can only be rendered safe by the passage of time. The waste radioactivity is .generated in the fuel system of the reactors because only a part of the fuel is fissionable and, for technical reasons, not all of the fissionable elements are spent. Much of the spent fuel materials removed from the reactor can be reused. However, some of the radioactive fuel in the spent elements cannot be removed, and this material adds to the radioactive waste.
We have already generated over 10,000 tons of nuclear waste, with another 47,000 tons expected by 19951 Most of the waste is in the form of fuel rods which are, for now, stored in baths filled with a solution of neutron-absorbing boric acid. The problem is that these are only temporary repositories and,’ unless new space is found, existing plants must begin closing for lack of space. The rods can be reprocessed, but the technology could lead to the fuel for nuclear weapons.
The reprocessing also leaves "high-level liquid waste" that must be stored. The prevailing idea at the moment is to dry the liquid and mix it with molten glass that, when it hardens, can be stored in tanks. Suggestions range from burying it in the Antarctic to sending it into space.
Which of the following risks occurs most frequently at nuclear power plants?
选项
A、Leakage of untreated nuclear wastes.
B、Explosions.
C、Earthquakes.
D、Gas or steam leaks.
答案
D
解析
此题旨在考查考生对文章中所叙述事实的记忆。第二段中作者主要讨论了核泄漏问题,并举例来证明这是目前核能使用存在的一个大问题。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/vsYO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
IntheartoftheMiddleAges,weneverencounterthepersonalityoftheartistasanindividual;ratheritisdiffusedthrough
RobertCongel,acommercialreal-estatedeveloperwholivesinupstateNewYork,hasaplanto"changetheworld."Convincedtha
WhichbandisfromBritain?
Patientstendtofeelindignantandinsultedifthephysiciantellsthemhecanfindnoorganiccauseforthepain.Theytendto
Patientstendtofeelindignantandinsultedifthephysiciantellsthemhecanfindnoorganiccauseforthepain.Theytendto
ClassificationofLodgingPlacesThetouristindustryhasitsownsystemtoclassifydifferenttypesoflodgingplaces.Five
Ihavenostatisticsonthis,butconversationwithfriendsanddozensofperson-on-the-streetinterviewsIsawandheardlastm
A、AnIsraelisniperkilledaPalestinianmilitant.B、Israelitroophasreceivedorderforfurthermilitaryactivites.C、Ricevis
PresidentBushhasproposedaddingoptionalpersonalaccountsasoneofthecentralelementsofamajorSocialSecurityreformp
Countriesatalllevelsofeconomicdevelopmentfaceasimilarchallenge:tomaketheirindustriescompetitiveinanincreasingl
随机试题
Childrenaregettingsofattheymaybethefirstgenerationtodiebeforetheirparents,anexpertclaimedyesterday.Today’sy
可致“首如裹”的邪气是
假设某基金在2008年12月3日的份额净值为1.848元,2009年9月1日的份额净值为1.7886元,期间基金曾经在2009年2月28日每10份派息2.75元,那么这一阶段该基金的简单收益率为( )。
按劳动法有关规定,劳动合同无效的情形包括()。
人民警察对公民提出解决纠纷的要求,可以给予帮助。
事实上,葡萄糖燃料电池的理念并不是________。早在20世纪70年代,科学家就提出能以这种电池为心脏起搏器提供动力。但这一________最终因为葡萄糖燃料电池所使用的酶不能长久发挥作用,以及锂离子电池能在单位面积内提供更强劲的能量而________。
以经济建设为中心是兴国之要,发展仍然是解决我国所有问题的关键。只有推动经济持续健康发展,才能筑牢国家繁荣富强、人民幸福安康、社会和谐稳定的物质基础。必须坚持发展是硬道理的战略思想,决不能有丝毫动摇。在当代中国,坚持发展是硬道理的本质要求就是坚持科
编译程序对高级语言源程序进行翻译时,需要在该程序的地址空间中为变量指定地址,这种地址称为(19)。
(33)以静态或动态的连接方式,为应用程序提供一组可使用的类。
AnautoloanJohnBakerworksintheloandepartmentofabankinDenver,Colorado.Heisaloanof-ricer.StanleyFanelli
最新回复
(
0
)