首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The Roslin Institute announced last week that it had applied to patent the method by which its scientists had cloned Dolly the s
The Roslin Institute announced last week that it had applied to patent the method by which its scientists had cloned Dolly the s
admin
2010-07-19
48
问题
The Roslin Institute announced last week that it had applied to patent the method by which its scientists had cloned Dolly the sheep. The patent, if granted, would apply to "nuclear transfer technology" in both human and animal cells. One point of the patent is to help fund research into cures for diseases such as Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, cancer and heart failure.
Its other aim is to make some money. Last May, the Roslin Institute was taken over by Geron, an American biotech company. Geron has committed $32.5 million to research at the Roslin. It wants to get its money back. Two scientists from Stanford who developed the use of restriction enzymes, one of the fundamental techniques in biotechnology, made about pounds 80 million out of it in the 17 years before the patent expired. So you can see why Geron-Roslin is so keen to get its patent. There’s nothing wrong with that. Without the prospect of a return at the end of investment, no one would ever lend money to anyone involved in bio-medical research—and given the huge sums now required to develop a new drug, or a new diagnostic test for some medical condition, that would mean there wouldn’t be any research. It is wonderful when people give money to worthwhile causes with no hope of personal gain. But appealing to altruism simply won’t raise the billions required to develop and market drugs and therapies that rely on biotechnology. For that, you have to appeal to investors’ self-interest—which is why the bulk of medical research is funded not by charities or even tax-payers but by private companies and individuals.
The fact that biotech research depends on patents generates profound hostility. The opposition to the patenting of genetic sequences, cells, tissues and clones—critics call it "the privatization of nature"—takes many forms, from a Luddite desire to stop scientific research to a genuine, if mistaken, conviction that common ownership is always morally preferable to private property. But all of the objections have a single root. the sense that it must be wrong to make money out of the constituents of the human body. They cannot be "owned" by any individual, because they belong to everyone. There cannot be "property in people".
That is a profound mistake. The truth is rather the opposite: there is only property in things because there is property in people. People own their own bodies, and that ownership is the basis of their property rights (and most other individual rights, come to that). The problem with the law as it stands is that it doesn’t sufficiently recognize an individual’s property rights over his or her own body, and his or her entitlement to make money out of it.
The outcome of a lawsuit in the US nearly 10 years ago defined the de facto rules governing the ownership of human tissues, and the financial exploitation of the discoveries that derive from them. In Moorev the Regents of UCLA the issue was whether an individual was entitled to a share of the profits that a biotech company made from developing drugs or treatments derived from cells that came from his body. Dr David Golde had discovered that John Moore, one of his patients, had a pancreas whose cells had some unusual properties that might be helpful in treating a form of cancer. In his laboratory, Golde developed what his called a "cell line" from Moore’s cells and patented it. When Moore found out, he sued Dr Golde for a share of whatever profits the cell line generated.
Mr. Moore lost. The court said he had no right to any of those profits, because he did not own the cells removed from his body. Moreover, the court held that since "research on human cells plays a critical role in medical research", granting property rights to the patient from whom the cells came threatened to "hinder research by restricting access to the raw materials".
In essence, that decision said that biotech companies could own and make money out of human cells and tissue—but the person from whom that tissue or cells came could not. The logic behind that decision is bizarre. No one except the most unreconstructed communist disputes that I own my own body. Indeed, it is only because I own my body that I can come to own anything else independent of it, mixing my labor with something being the most fundamental means by which I can come to own it. If cells from Mr. Moore’s body are his property, how can anyone else come to own them—unless he sells or gives those cells to them? (778 words)
Which of the following statements is true?
选项
A、Without a prospect of a of at the end of investment, no one would ever lend money to anyone involved in bio-medical research.
B、Private fund is the most important financial source for scientific research.
C、It is commonly agreed that people can dispose their own body organs because of their ownership.
D、Commercial use of body organs is unconstitutional in the US.
答案
D
解析
三个备选答案,根据文章内容均可判断是正确的。第一项如果投资没有回报的话,恐怕没有人愿意借钱给任何人去做生物医学研究。B不对,私人企业和个人投资是进行医学研究重要的资金来源,但不能就此理解为“最重要的”。C不正确,从第四段可见,有反对观点认为“身体并非人们的私有财产”。 D所述内容文中未提到。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/wAlO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
ThethirdparagraphexaminesAmerica’sfuture-mindednessfromthe______perspective.Accordingtothepassage,peopleatpres
______isgenerallydefinedasthestudyofmeaningandusuallypaysattentiontothestudyofmeaningoflinguisticunitsthems
Whatdidthegovernmentintendtodointhebeginning?
TheWasteLandby______isregardedbyscholarsthemostimportantpoemofthe20thcentury.
CultureShockCultureshockisapainfulexperiencewegothroughwhenweencountermanynewthingsinanothercountryandw
DuringtheBritishCivilWar,thesupportersofthekingwascalled______.
1Weareheedlessintheformationofourbeliefs,butfindourselvesfilledwithaferventpassionforthemwhenanyonechal
"Style"hasgotabadnamebygrowingassociatedwithpreciousandsuitorpersonswho,likeOscarWilde,spendamorningputting
Inadditiontohistheoryofcolor,Newtondevelopedatheoryofhowlighttravels,Thisisknownasthecorpusculartheoryofl
A、Shehadablimpride.B、Shehadahorseride.C、ShetouchedtheHollywoodsign.D、Shestayedathome.A
随机试题
企业在竞争比较激烈的情况下进行的一种战略选择是()
纯RNA样品的A260/A280应为
根据《行政处罚法》和《治安管理处罚法》,下列有关罚款决定的说法正确的有:
水利水电工程中河床深厚覆盖层是指厚度大于()m的河床覆盖层。
电力设施保护的主体有()。
背景某机电工程采用EPC/交钥匙总承包的方式进行公开招标,并在国家发改委依法指定的媒体上发布了招标公告和资格预审公告。公告中明确说明了承包商报名时间及提供的资料;工程的基本情况;投标人需提交标书费用、押金、投标保函的要求;投标人获取和送达标书的方
可持续增长的思想在于企业的增长可以高于或低于可持续增长率,但是管理人员必须事先解决公司超过可持续增长率之上的增长所导致的财务问题,超过部分的资金可以采用()的方法解决。
A、 B、 C、 D、 D每个图形都由5个方块组成,且阴影方块的个数依次为3、2、3、4,每次减少或增加一个阴影方块,由此得出本题规律为相邻两个图形有且只有一个方块的颜色不同。
我国荒漠化总体扩张的趋势还在延续,不断______原本有限的生存空间,直接制约着国家社会和经济的可持续发展。填入划横线部分最恰当的一项是()。
美国是最发达的资本主义国家,中国是最大的发展中国家。近十三亿人口的中国保持稳定和加快发展,对促进亚太地区和世界的稳定与发展,具有极其重要的意义。中国拥有广大的市场和发展需求,美国拥有先进的科学技术和巨大的物质力量,两国之间有着很强的经济互补性。中国的潜在市
最新回复
(
0
)