首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The Roslin Institute announced last week that it had applied to patent the method by which its scientists had cloned Dolly the s
The Roslin Institute announced last week that it had applied to patent the method by which its scientists had cloned Dolly the s
admin
2010-07-19
21
问题
The Roslin Institute announced last week that it had applied to patent the method by which its scientists had cloned Dolly the sheep. The patent, if granted, would apply to "nuclear transfer technology" in both human and animal cells. One point of the patent is to help fund research into cures for diseases such as Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, cancer and heart failure.
Its other aim is to make some money. Last May, the Roslin Institute was taken over by Geron, an American biotech company. Geron has committed $32.5 million to research at the Roslin. It wants to get its money back. Two scientists from Stanford who developed the use of restriction enzymes, one of the fundamental techniques in biotechnology, made about pounds 80 million out of it in the 17 years before the patent expired. So you can see why Geron-Roslin is so keen to get its patent. There’s nothing wrong with that. Without the prospect of a return at the end of investment, no one would ever lend money to anyone involved in bio-medical research—and given the huge sums now required to develop a new drug, or a new diagnostic test for some medical condition, that would mean there wouldn’t be any research. It is wonderful when people give money to worthwhile causes with no hope of personal gain. But appealing to altruism simply won’t raise the billions required to develop and market drugs and therapies that rely on biotechnology. For that, you have to appeal to investors’ self-interest—which is why the bulk of medical research is funded not by charities or even tax-payers but by private companies and individuals.
The fact that biotech research depends on patents generates profound hostility. The opposition to the patenting of genetic sequences, cells, tissues and clones—critics call it "the privatization of nature"—takes many forms, from a Luddite desire to stop scientific research to a genuine, if mistaken, conviction that common ownership is always morally preferable to private property. But all of the objections have a single root. the sense that it must be wrong to make money out of the constituents of the human body. They cannot be "owned" by any individual, because they belong to everyone. There cannot be "property in people".
That is a profound mistake. The truth is rather the opposite: there is only property in things because there is property in people. People own their own bodies, and that ownership is the basis of their property rights (and most other individual rights, come to that). The problem with the law as it stands is that it doesn’t sufficiently recognize an individual’s property rights over his or her own body, and his or her entitlement to make money out of it.
The outcome of a lawsuit in the US nearly 10 years ago defined the de facto rules governing the ownership of human tissues, and the financial exploitation of the discoveries that derive from them. In Moorev the Regents of UCLA the issue was whether an individual was entitled to a share of the profits that a biotech company made from developing drugs or treatments derived from cells that came from his body. Dr David Golde had discovered that John Moore, one of his patients, had a pancreas whose cells had some unusual properties that might be helpful in treating a form of cancer. In his laboratory, Golde developed what his called a "cell line" from Moore’s cells and patented it. When Moore found out, he sued Dr Golde for a share of whatever profits the cell line generated.
Mr. Moore lost. The court said he had no right to any of those profits, because he did not own the cells removed from his body. Moreover, the court held that since "research on human cells plays a critical role in medical research", granting property rights to the patient from whom the cells came threatened to "hinder research by restricting access to the raw materials".
In essence, that decision said that biotech companies could own and make money out of human cells and tissue—but the person from whom that tissue or cells came could not. The logic behind that decision is bizarre. No one except the most unreconstructed communist disputes that I own my own body. Indeed, it is only because I own my body that I can come to own anything else independent of it, mixing my labor with something being the most fundamental means by which I can come to own it. If cells from Mr. Moore’s body are his property, how can anyone else come to own them—unless he sells or gives those cells to them? (778 words)
Which of the following statements is true?
选项
A、Without a prospect of a of at the end of investment, no one would ever lend money to anyone involved in bio-medical research.
B、Private fund is the most important financial source for scientific research.
C、It is commonly agreed that people can dispose their own body organs because of their ownership.
D、Commercial use of body organs is unconstitutional in the US.
答案
D
解析
三个备选答案,根据文章内容均可判断是正确的。第一项如果投资没有回报的话,恐怕没有人愿意借钱给任何人去做生物医学研究。B不对,私人企业和个人投资是进行医学研究重要的资金来源,但不能就此理解为“最重要的”。C不正确,从第四段可见,有反对观点认为“身体并非人们的私有财产”。 D所述内容文中未提到。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/wAlO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Accordingtothepassage,devolutionwasmainlymeantto______.AccordingtoDyfanJoneswhathaschangedis______.
Accordingtothepassage,devolutionwasmainlymeantto______.WhichofthefollowingisNOTcitedasanexampleoftheresur
Howwasitpossible,Iaskedmyself,towalkforanhourthroughthewoodsandseenothingworthyofnote?Iwhocannotseefind
社区教育是外来名词,由联合国教科文组织对社区教育的界定引入到对我国社区教育的定义。随着我国经济的发展,城市化进程的加快,大批城乡居民搬迁新居,从而产生了一个个居民小区,社区由此形成。而社区教育适应了社区居民精神生活和终身学习的需要,满足了居民的受教育的权利
"Acrowdisnotcompany,andfacesarebutagalleryofpictures,andtalkbutatinklingcymbal,wherethereisnolove."Thea
TheSeattletimesCompanyisonenewspaperfirmthathasrecognizedtheneedforchangeanddonesomethingaboutit.Inthenews
A、payingtoolittleattentiontothisissueB、followingtheUStoocloselyC、toomuchconfidenceaboutitsownabilityD、lackof
A、debateanon-confidencemotioninhisgovernmentB、resignC、introducethenoconfidencemeasureD、clearthepoliticalairB
"Competenceandperformance"conceptwasmainlydevelopedby______.
Helackedofthecourage,self-confidenceandresolutiontoparticipateinMarathon.
随机试题
乳腺癌患者乳头内陷、乳头抬高是由于
腰椎盘突出常出现在
一个在中国境内开办的生产电视机的外国企业,因其电视机质量存在问题,被中国公民投诉。当地工商行政管理局对该外国企业作出罚款6000元的决定,该外国企业不服,向人民法院提起行政诉讼。对于本案情况,下述观点中正确的是()。
设y=f(f),t=φ(x)都可微,则dy=()。
根据分布特点,城市污染源可分为()
质量认证第三方依据程序对产品、过程或服务符合规定的要求给予书面保证。质量认证包括( )。
实行对外贸易宏观管理的必要性是什么?
下列属于税收司法的基本原则的有()。
快递来了不敢开门,查水表的不让进屋,买肉时总用手按按看肉里有没有注水,去超市买牛奶面包看不清保质期绝不会轻易埋单……怀疑一切似乎成了当今社会很多人的心理共识,老百姓成了“老不信”这导致政府、专家及媒体等公信力严重受损。一项权威调查表明,中国社会的总体信任度
使用VC6打开考生文件夹下的源程序文件modi3.cpp。其中定义的类并不完整,按要求完成下列操作,将类的定义补充完整。完成以下功能:(1)类CBase有一个常数变量Number1,在构造函数时对其初始化,请在注释//********1********后
最新回复
(
0
)