首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the following article from a newspaper and answer questions 19-25. For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B,
Read the following article from a newspaper and answer questions 19-25. For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B,
admin
2019-03-04
55
问题
Read the following article from a newspaper and answer questions 19-25.
For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B, C or D.
Are You Afraid of MOOCs?
Are MOOCs and other online materials a threat to quality public higher education, and to our role as professors? The members of the philosophy department at San Jose State University think so. They recently issued an open letter to Michael Sandel, a professor of Harvard University, objecting to his role in encouraging the use of MOOCs at public universities. The controversy stems from San Jose State’s contract with edX, a company that provides MOOCs, including one based on Sandel’s course on justice at Harvard. San Jose State has agreed to use materials provided by edX, but the philosophy department has refused to use Sandel’s online lectures in its courses. Though MOOCs are still new, many of the arguments presented by the San Jose State philosophy professors do not ring true in light of my experience.
We should begin by distinguishing two issues. The philosophy professors state that they have felt pressured by their administration to use the materials from Sandel’s course. The administration denies exerting any such pressure. Whatever the truth of the matter, that is an issue of academic freedom, and not about the pedagogical merits of using MOOCs and other online materials. I certainly agree that professors should be, responsible for the content and pedagogy in their own courses.
The real issue, then, is whether the availability and use of online materials, whether through MOOCs or through other channels, is a threat to quality education, especially at public universities. Many of the arguments presented in the letter presuppose an either/or, all-or-nothing approach when it comes to face-to-face versus online teaching. But the whole point of a hybrid, or blended, course is that it combines both. And it is difficult to see why it makes a great deal of difference whether the online content is delivered via a MOOC or not.
Nothing will ever replace the face-to-face discussions that occur in the classroom. But in many traditional, on-campus courses, little discussion occurs. In a lecture course with hundreds, or even just scores, of students, much of the time in the classroom is inevitably spent with the professor lecturing and the students(hopefully)taking notes-or at least listening attentively. In courses with a significant lecture component, the advantages of using online lectures are undeniable. I know from my own experience that, if my attention wanes for a few moments, it is very convenient to simply go back and play a portion again. One can do the same if one doesn’t quite understand something the first time. And one need not miss material to take a bathroom break.
The availability of high-quality online lectures is an opportunity to rethink how we spend our time in the classroom. If an online lecture presents the material, or walks students through an argument, we are freed to spend more time discussing the aspects of the material that are most difficult-or most interesting. We can do other kinds of activities that we might not have time for if we felt obliged to present the material in the traditional way. Yes, hybrid courses usually involve less face-to-face time, but that time can be better and more effectively spent.
The crucial thing is that
the instructor remains in the driver’s seat
-and that takes us back to academic freedom. As long as individual professors are choosing what material to assign or recommend, running their in-class discussions and adding material that they think is not adequately covered in the online lectures, choosing the assignments and tests, and grading those tests, there is no threat to the professoriate, or to the quality of education at universities, public or otherwise.
One major advantage of online courses over the traditional ones is that they______.
选项
A、motivate more students to learn
B、require less time and concentration
C、provide more activities for teachers
D、can be replayed when needed
答案
D
解析
见第4段第4句和第5句“In courses with…a portion again”,因此选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/wd9d777K
本试题收录于:
BFT阅读题库国际化人才外语考试(BFT)分类
0
BFT阅读
国际化人才外语考试(BFT)
相关试题推荐
Yougotaletterfromacompanymanager,JimGreen.Dec.1st,20
HereisaletterfromColoradoStateUniversitytoinformtheapplicantMr.LithathehasbeenadmittedtoCognitivePsychology
HereisaletterwhichcomplainsaboutthequalityoftheTVsetboughtinastore.Readtheletterandcompletethegiveninfor
HereisanadvertisementaboutaBusinessBookClub.Readtheadvertisementandcompletethegiveninformationform.Wri
Lookatthefollowingstatement:Beingcreativeisthekeytocareersuccess.Doyouagreeordisagreew
Readthefollowingtextanddecidewhichanswerbestfitseachspace.Forquestions26-45,markoneletterA,B,CorDony
Readthefollowingtextanddecidewhichanswerbestfitseachspace.Forquestions26-45,markoneletterA,B,CorDony
Readthefollowingtextanddecidewhichanswerbestfitseachspace.Forquestions26-45,markoneletterA,B,CorDony
Readthearticlebelow.Choosethebestsentencefromthelistonthenextpagetofilleachofthegaps.Foreachgap(1
Readthefollowingpassageanddecidewhichanswerbestfitseachspace.Forquestions26~45,markoneletterA,B,CorDo
随机试题
三环类抗抑郁药中毒的临床表现主要是
A.抑制甲状腺素合成B.抑制甲状腺素释放C.阻断外周组织T4向T3转化D.抑制5L脱碘酶E.破坏甲状腺滤泡细胞普萘洛尔能够
不宜早期使用营养支持疗法的疾病是
患者,男,68岁。吸烟40余年,逐渐发生咳嗽,目前呼吸困难严重。查体发现患者呈桶状胸,其原因是
()在消防灭火的使用中因性能可靠、成本低廉而被广泛采用。
某初一(3)班,40人,授课内容:原地头上掷实心球,王老师在课的准备部分,组织学生围绕圆周(R=10m)慢跑,做行进间徒手操。在课的运动技能教学部分王老师站在圆周直径的三分之二处,面向多数学生讲解原地掷球的动作要领,进行示范。如下图所示:问题:
2022年2月3日,国家主席习近平向国际奥委会第139次全会开幕式发表视频致辞。习近平主席强调,中方将竭诚为世界奉献一届()的奥运盛会,践行()的奥林匹克格言。
有以下程序intadd(inta,intb){return(a+b);)main(){intk,(*f)(),a=5,b=10;f=add;}则以下函数调用语句错误的是
WhatfoodisnotprovidedformostBritishchildrenatschool?
A、Shefeltverysorry.B、Shewasinahurry.C、Shefeltabitannoyed.D、Shewassurprised.C综合推断题,从女士的话Can’tyouknockonthed
最新回复
(
0
)