首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A、A train crash. B、A parade. C、A bomb attack. D、A power surge. B
A、A train crash. B、A parade. C、A bomb attack. D、A power surge. B
admin
2017-03-15
71
问题
My tiny walk-on role in London’s drama began shortly after nine in the morning. The underground train I was travelling on stopped sharply as we approached Paddington station. "Something’s happened on the line ahead," said the driver, "it must be serious." It was. Although at that stage I didn’t know it, a bomb had exploded on a train at the very next station Edgware Road killing and injuring dozens of people.
We were led along a section of track and up some stairs. On the roads outside, ambulance and police sirens wailed. Long suffering London commuters—still unaware of the cause or scale of what was happening—began to look for alternative routes. Strangers talked to strangers—a rare event in the morning rush hour. Everyone had a theory. A train crash, a power surge, a bomb attack—perhaps two bombs, maybe more.
Then it was clear, London had been attacked. People, ordinary people on buses and trains had been killed and injured. In my experience, there is a universal human response to such news. Whether it happens in London or Jerusalem, New York or Baghdad, Madrid or Bali. Find family and friends, call them now—make sure they’re OK—tell them you’re OK. Everything else can wait.
In my case, there was an instant sense of irony. For the past four years, I have lived with a young family in Jerusalem through one of the most intensive campaigns of suicide bombing that any single city has ever experienced. At times it has seemed that each bus might explode, that every restaurant, every cafe was a potential death trap. A number of friends and colleagues have had close shaves and as a journalist I’ve seen the horror such attacks can cause. But as I called my wife in Jerusalem to reassure her, I realised that this incident in London was as close as I’d ever been to getting caught up in a bombing myself.
Now, as the dust begins to settle, I can’t help wondering how all this might affect London in the long run. In Israel, repeated attacks against civilians over a period of years have led to a culture of extreme security—guards on the door of virtually every public place, vehicles checked before entering car parks, police roadblocks on busy shopping streets. Normal life does continue, but with constant reminders of the threat.
One of the joys of family visits to London in recent years has been the simple pleasure of extreme normality, a meal in a restaurant without constant glances toward the door, a long, relaxing bus ride across town, not having to explain to my daughters why soldiers with guns are stopping cars in the street. Above all, London is one of the great melting pots of world culture, where people of all races, all religions and cultures can and do live in relative harmony. Could this now be under threat?
In Jerusalem the ravages of history have left a city sharply divided—often literally street by street—Arab from Jew, Christian from Muslim, Secular from Religious. Only since living there have I grown to realise how much I took for granted growing up on London’s cosmopolitan streets.
And yet after the bombings here, the mood on those same streets seems clear. And absolute determination not to allow the killings to change London’s way of life in any substantial way. The newspapers are full of fiery resolve, of how Londoners have seen off the German Luftwaffe and the bombers of the IRA in the past and will now face down the islamic extremists suspected of this latest attack. And as I pack my bags to return to Jerusalem, I have little doubt that that’s exactly what my fellow Londoners will do.
16. Where was the speaker when the bomb attack happened?
17. When the attack happened everyone had a theory. Which one of the following is not mentioned?
18. Where was the speaker’s wife when the bomb exploded?
19. Which one of the following statements is true about the Middle East according to the speaker?
20. What exactly will the speaker’s fellow Londoners do after the bomb attack according to the speaker?
选项
A、A train crash.
B、A parade.
C、A bomb attack.
D、A power surge.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/xCSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Although"namingrights"haveproliferatedinAmericanhighereducationforthepastseveraldecades,thephenomenonhasrecentl
TherearebothgreatsimilaritiesandconsiderablediversityintheecosystemsthatevolvedontheislandsofOceaniainandaro
TherearebothgreatsimilaritiesandconsiderablediversityintheecosystemsthatevolvedontheislandsofOceaniainandaro
Everyautumn,retailershirelargenumbersofseasonalworkerstohandletherushofholidaybusiness.Then,afterthenewyear
Thefactorywaspublicly________bytheEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyforhavingneglectedenvironmentalprotocols.
Banksare________toprotecttheircustomers’financialprivacyandatthesametimenotifytherelatedagenciesofcertainquest
1986年全国人大常委会副委员长班禅喇嘛在西康地区大法会上教诲信徒们,要爱惜民族团结,维护祖国统一。在中国,公民的信仰自由受到法律保护。目前全西藏在寺僧尼约有14,000多人,另有800位宗教界人士在各级人大、政协、佛教协会和政府部门中工作。
A、Theyallowittomaneuvereffectivelyinasmallareas.B、Theyallowittoswimquicklyoverlongdistances.C、Dorsalandpect
A、Warbles.B、Robins.C、Sparrows.D、Crows.D此题属于细节题,也可以通过我们的常识推出。我们往往喜欢用乌鸦声来比喻难听的声音,因此,很明显乌鸦不可能是会唱歌的鸟类了。
A、Thelargefueltankswerebroken.B、Itwasanobviousterroristattack.C、NobodywasinjuredorkilledD、Theattackerstriedt
随机试题
阅读下列两则新闻报道材料,并根据材料后的问题作出解释说明:新闻一、克拉克退出保守党领袖角逐(2005年10月19日)英国前保守党政府财政大臣克拉克已经从保守党领袖角逐中落败,克拉克说他对结果当然很失望。但是他表示,无论谁当选党的领袖,都
抗干扰性最好的传输介质是()
“五四”以来,最擅长用“自叙传”方式写作的是()
积聚的病因有
总分类账户与明细分类账户的主要区别在与( )。
A承建集团将项目工程通过招标的形式交由B建筑公司承建,A集团要求B公司投保履约保证保险。合同保证保险根据工程承包合同()来确定保险责任。
党的领导、人民当家作主和依法治国三者的关系是()。
Thespeechismainlyabouttheorganizationofthecompany.
Whatdoesthemanagreetodowiththesuit?
Whatistheroleofcomputersintheproductionprocess?
最新回复
(
0
)