首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Our present generation of cultural critics, arriving after the assault of postmodernism and the increasingly widespread commerci
Our present generation of cultural critics, arriving after the assault of postmodernism and the increasingly widespread commerci
admin
2016-01-30
23
问题
Our present generation of cultural critics, arriving after the assault of postmodernism and the increasingly widespread commercialization of culture, has been cast adrift, without any firm basis for judgments. Publications and institutions to support serious criticism, in this view, either no longer exist or are few in number.
Critics today, it is also claimed, are too cozy behind the ivied walls of academe, content to employ a prose style that is decipherable only to a handful of the cognoscenti. The deadly dive of University critics into the shallow depths of popular culture, moreover, reveals the unwillingness of these critics to uphold standards. Even if the reasons offered are contradictory, these Jeremiahs huddle around their sad conclusion that serious cultural criticism has fallen into a morass of petty bickering and bloated reputations.
Such narratives of declension, a staple of American intellectual life since the time of the Puritans, are misplaced, self-serving, and historically inaccurate, so difficult to prove. Has the level of criticism declined in the last 50 years? Of course the logic of such an opinion depends on the figures that are being contrasted with one another. Any number of cultural critics thriving today could be invoked to demonstrate that cultural criticism is alive and well.
But many new and thriving venues for criticism and debate exist today, and they are not limited solely to the discussion of literary works. Actually, they became so entrusted with their own certitude and political judgments that they became largely irrelevant. Today the complaint is that literary culture lacks civility. We live in an age of commercialism and spectacle. Writers seek the limelight, and one way to bask in it is to publish reviews that scorch the landscape, with Dale Peck as the famous, but not atypical, case in point. Heidi Julavits, in an essay in The Believer, lamented the downfall of serious fiction and reviewing. She surveyed a literary culture that had embraced "snark" , her term for hostile, self-serving reviews.
The snark review, according to Julavits, eschews a serious engagement with literature in favor of a sound-bite approach, an attempt to turn the review into a form of entertainment akin to film reviews or restaurant critiques. A critic found cultural criticism to be in "critical condition." For him, the postmodern turn to theory, in its questioning of objectivity, cut the critical, independent ground out from under reviewers. The rise of chain bookstores and blockbuster best sellers demeaned literary culture, making it prey to the commercial values of the market and entertainment.
The criticism does not seem discontinuous. Nor should we forget that civility rarely reigned in the circles of New York intellectuals. The art critic Clement Greenberg physically pummeled the theater critic Lionel Abel after Abel rejected the view that Jean Wahl, the French philosopher, was anti-Semitic. Though Robert Peck has the reputation of a literary hatchet man, so far as I know his blows thus far have all been confined to the printed page.
Cultural criticism has certainly changed over the years. The old days of the critic who wielded unchallenged authority have happily passed. Ours is a more pluralistic age, one not beholden to a narrow literary culture. The democratization of criticism — as in the Amazon system of readers’ evaluating books — is a messy affair, as democracy must be. But the solution to the problems of criticism in the present is best not discovered in the musty basements of nostalgia and sentiment for the cultural criticism of a half-century gone. Rather the solution is to recognize, as John Dewey did almost a century ago, that the problems of democracy demand more democracy, less nostalgia for a golden age that never was, and a spirit of openness to what is new and invigorating in our culture.
How do the university critics like the serious cultural criticism?
选项
A、Cultural criticism is not serious enough when the articles are written in the cozy prose style.
B、Popular culture is so prevailing that serious critics are not willing to keep to the shallow standards.
C、Serious cultural criticism is full of insignificant quarrels and the public do not really trust it.
D、Cultural critics have become so serious as to tell the stories imbued with American intellectual Puritanism.
答案
C
解析
细节推理题。根据题干关键词university critics定位到原文第二段。第二段尾句中的fallen into amorass of petty bickering and bloated reputations与选项C对应,他们认为严肃的文学批评已经陷入堕落之中。故答案为C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/xGGO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Tofightagainstcomputercrimes,acomputersystemneedsasurewayofidentifyingitsrightusersandrejectingthosewhoare
Financialstatementisafinancialreportorrecord______usuallyonaquarterlyandannuallybasiswhichprovidesanindividual’
我们清楚地认识到,中国人口多,底子薄,城乡、区域发展不平行,资源环境约束强化,就业压力增加,脱贫任务仍然很重。中国已经制定了未来五年经济社会发展的蓝图,我们坚持以科学发展为主题,以加快转变经济发展方式为主线,深化改革开放,保障民生,促进经济长期平衡较快发展
Today,theTowerofLondonisoneofthemostpopulartourist【C1】______andattractsoverthreemillionvisitorsayear.Itw
Onebillionpeopleintheworldareshortofwater.Howcanthisproblembesolved?Somesuggestionshavebeentodesalinate(除去盐
成都是一座来了就不想走的城市。
AstoutoldladywaswalkingwithherbasketdownthemiddleofastreetinPetrogradtothegreatconfusionofthetrafficand
Researcherswhoareunfamiliarwiththeculturalandethnicgroupstheyarestudyingmusttakeextraprecautionstoshedanybia
Surveyshaveshownthatmostfootballandbasketballinjuriesinvolvetheknee,eitherthroughtwistingorthroughapplicationo
FreeAdviceIsJustAroundtheCornerWhenDanielFranklin,apoliticalscienceprofessorfromAtlanta,neededcareeradvanc
随机试题
假设检验的基本思想是()。Ⅰ.先对总体的参数或分布函数的表达式做出某种假设,然后找出一个在假设成立条件下出现可能性甚小的(条件)小概率事件Ⅱ.如果试验或抽样的结果使该小概率事件出现了,这与小概率原理相违背,表明原来的假设有问题,应予
A.产后2~3dB.产后4dC.3~7dD.产后10~14dE.产后2~3周新生儿乳房肿大或乳汁分泌自然消退的时间是()
根据《水利水电工程标准施工招标文件》,变更的范围包括()等。
人们通常认为可以通过动物的异常行为来预测海啸。这种看法是基于主观类比,不一定能揭示客观联系。一只猫在海啸前24小时行为异常,给它的主人留下深刻印象,但事实上,这个世界上的任何一刻,都有猫行为异常。为了评论上述论证,回答以下哪个问题最不重要?(
如果没有闪电,人类将失去一位勤劳的“清洁工”。闪电交作时,大气中的部分氧气被激发成臭氧,稀薄的臭氧不但不臭,而且能吸收大部分宇宙射线,使地球表面的生物免遭紫外线过量照射的危害。闪电过程中产生的高温,又可杀死大气中90%以上的细菌和微生物,从而使空气变得更加
把数学和语言学这两门差别悬殊的学科联系起来的强有力的纽带,是语言通讯技术和电子计算机,前者实现了语言符号的远距离传输和转换,后者则用数字化的快速运算来处理非数值符号——语言。20世纪以来科学发展日新月异的要求,使数学的领域空前地扩展了,语言学的领域也空前地
《吾国吾民》是()的代表作。该书将中国人的性格、心灵、理想、生活、政治、社会、艺术剖析得非常美妙,并与西方人的性格、理想、生活等做了相应的广泛深入的比较,在海内外引起轰动。
Theproblemtobetakenupandthepointatwhichthesearchforasolutionwillbeginarecustomarilyprescribedbytheinvesti
【B1】【B14】
Communicationinaforeignlanguagemustinvolvebothteachersandpupilsusingthetargetlanguageasthenormalmeansofcomm
最新回复
(
0
)