首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Critics and supporters of the United Nations have sometimes seen worlds apart. But since last year, almost all of them, whether
Critics and supporters of the United Nations have sometimes seen worlds apart. But since last year, almost all of them, whether
admin
2014-07-25
38
问题
Critics and supporters of the United Nations have sometimes seen worlds apart. But since last year, almost all of them, whether multilateralist or unilateralist, American or European, have come to agree that the organization is in crisis. This week, a blue ribbon panel commissioned by the body’s secretary- general, Keri Annan, released its report on what to do about it.
The U. N. ’s sorry state became most obvious with the Iraq war. Those favoring the war were furious that after a decade of Security Council resolutions, including the last-chance Resolution 1441 threatening "serious consequences" if Iraq did not prove its disarmament, the U. N. could not agree to act. Anti-war types were just as frustrated that the world body failed to stop the war. But Iraq was not the U. N. ’s only problem. It has done little to stop humanitarian disasters, such as the ongoing horror in Sudan. And it has done nothing to stop Iran’s and North Korea’s pursuit of nuclear weapons.
Recognizing the danger of irrelevance, Mr. Annan last year told a 16-member panel, composed mainly of former government ministers and heads of government, to suggest changes. These fall broadly into two categories: the institutional and the cultural. The former has got most of the headlines -- particularly a call for changing the structure of the Security Council. But changes in the U. N. ’s working practices are crucial too.
Everyone agrees that the Security Council is an unrepresentative relic: of its 15 seats, five are occupied by permanent, veto-wielding members (America, Russia, China, Britain and France) and ten go to countries that rotate every two years and have no veto. But that the council’s composition is a throwback to the world order immediately after the Second World War has been agreed on for decades, without any success in changing it. Japan and Germany, the secondand thirdbiggest contributors to the U.N. budget, believe they are entitled to permanent seats. So does India, the world’s second-most- populous country, and Brazil, Latin America’s biggest. Unlike in previous efforts, these four have finally banded together to press their case. And they are joined in spirit by the Africans, who want two seats for their continent.
But each aspirant has opponents. Italy opposes a permanent seat for Germany, which would make Italy the only biggish European power. It instead proposes a single seat for the European Union, a non- starter since this would require Britain and France to give up theirs, and regional institutions cannot be U.N. members under the current U.N. Charter. Spanish-speaking Mexico and Argentina do not think Portuguese-speaking Brazil should represent Latin America, and Pakistan strongly opposes its rival India’s bid. As for potential African seats, Egypt claims one as the representative of the Muslim and Arab world. That would leave Nigeria, the continent’s most populous country, and South Africa, which is richer and a more stable democracy, fighting for the other.
The panel has proposed two alternatives. The first would give six countries (none is named but probably Germany, Japan, India, Brazil and two African countries) permanent seats without a veto, and create three extra non-permanent seats, bringing the total number of council members to 24. The second, which would expand the council by the same number of seats, creates a new middle tier of members who would serve for four years and could be immediately re-elected, above the current lower tier of two-year members, who cannot be re-elected. The rivals to the would-be permanent members favor this option.
While Security Council reform may be the most visible of the proposals, the panel has also shared its views on the guidelines on when members may use force legally. Under the U. N. Charter, they can do so in two circumstances only: Article 51 allows force in a clear case of self-defense, and Chapter permits its use when the Security Council agrees. While the panelists have not proposed major changes to these two parts of the Charter, they have offered refinements.
Though the Charter was written to govern war between countries, the panel argues that even without revision, Chapter W lets the Security Council authorize force for more controversial, modem reasons like fighting terrorists and intervention in states committing humanitarian horrors. It even considers "preventive" wars against serious but non-imminent threats potentially justifiable.
But the panel also says any decision to use force must pass five tests: the threat must be grave; the primary purpose must be to avert the threat; force must be a last resort; means must be proportional; and there must be a reasonable chance that force will succeed without calamitous consequences. All common-sense stuff, but the panel proposes making these tests explicit (if subjective and unofficial), thus raising the quality of debate about any decision to go to war.
On top of this, the report urges the U.N. to make better use of its assets in the fight against terrorism. One of the obstacles to an effective counter-terrorism strategy has been U.N. members’ inability to agree on a definition of terrorism. The panel tries to help by defining it as "any action that is intended to cause death or serious bodily harm to civilians or non-combatants"; Arab countries may continue to press for exemptions in the case of "foreign occupation". The report also deals with what it sees as a possible "cascade of nuclear proliferation" in the near future. It recommends creating more incentives for countries to stop enriching uranium.
选项
答案
B
解析
主旨题。文章自始至终都是针对联合国现有问题提出的改革建议,可见B正确。文章重点在如何解决问题而不在分析问题,故排除A;c原文中并没有提到;D只在原文第二段和结尾部分提到,属于细节而非主旨。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/y0pO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Somepeopleholdtheviewthatastudent’ssuccessinuniversitystudyfollowsthesamepatternasthatoffarming,whichischa
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisINCORRECT?
Itoftenhappensthatanumberofapplicantswithalmostidenticalqualificationsandexperienceallapplyforthesameposition
MigrationandBusinessI.MigrationMap—sharplinesdivideuptheworldRealworld-—no(1)______betweenlandsII.Twochangesof
MigrationandBusinessI.MigrationMap—sharplinesdivideuptheworldRealworld-—no(1)______betweenlandsII.Twochangesof
Ofallthesymbols,______,whichareconsideredtorepresentfertilityandnewlife,arethosemostfrequentlyassociatedwith
有一个细节不妨一记:我从旁观察何应钦向其僚属低语,原来他要那支有历史意义的毛笔留作纪念。风云变幻数十年,当年的日军投降书早已存入历史的档案,用于投降书上签署的那支毛笔大概也不知去向。历史是无情的,有它自已的轨迹和方向,伟大的中国人民抗日民族自卫战
Fivescoreyearsago,agreatAmerican,inwhosesymbolicshadowwestandsignedtheEmancipationProclamation.Thismomentousd
WeareevenfartherremovedfromtheunfocusednewspaperreviewspublishedinEnglandbetweentheturnofthe20thcenturyandt
WeareevenfartherremovedfromtheunfocusednewspaperreviewspublishedinEnglandbetweentheturnofthe20thcenturyandt
随机试题
结合材料回答问题:材料1“演艺先做人,做人德为先”,演艺人员作为公众人物,背后有成千上万喜爱、支持他们的人,理应在遵纪守法、道德品行方面以身作则。多年来,很多演艺人员,在这方面做得很好,深得公众认可和尊敬,他们的演艺事业也不断攀登新的高峰。当然
一个表只能有一个主键,主键一旦确定,便不允许向表中输入任何与已有主键值相同的数据。()
疑为子宫内膜不规则脱落者,理想的刮取子宫内膜活检的时间是
在询问病史中,哪一项最不重要如果患者为咯血,同时伴有皮肤粘膜出血,应考虑下列哪种疾病
下列不是谷类加工的目的是
后浇带的保留时间应根据设计确定,若设计无要求时,一般至少保留()以上。
黄金储备对货币供应量的影响取决于黄金()。
【2015.河南郑州】对未成年学生应尽的义务作了明确规定的法律是()。
Itisacommonplaceamongmoraliststhatyoucannotgethappinessbypursuingit.Thisisonlytrueifyoupursueit【C1】________
TelevisionSinceitsinventionin【1】______,televisionhasplayedan【1】______increasinglyimportantroleinourlife.Itaff
最新回复
(
0
)