首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a w
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a w
admin
2012-01-23
40
问题
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a while. Given that employers have been seeking help in their recruiting efforts for decades, it seems odd that the rise of RPO as a service solution has taken so long. Isn’t outsourcing of non-core functions a widely accepted business strategy? Isn’t recruiting one of the largest line items for many organisations and not a core function?
Today, however, organisations that consider outsourcing their recruiting efforts can pore over and compare tangible outcomes seen by those successful early adopters of RPO. But tread lightly. There have been a number of very public RPO failures where results have fallen woefully short of expcetations, sending business leaders and the marketplace back into the boardroom to debate yet again the viability and sustainability of the solution. Can RPO be truly successful? If there are companies out there who are reaping the proposed benefits of outsourcing, what are they doing that others are not? The fact is there are common elements—let’s even call them tenets—that when followed, can greatly increase the effectiveness and ultimate outcomes of the RPO solution. Before we look at those tenets, however, it’s it’s important to understand the history of RPO.
Recruitment process outsourcing is the culmination of an evolutionary process that started with third-party recruiters engaged at the line manager level or as an adiunct to an organlsatlon’s internal staffing initiatives. Utilising the approach was simple: call your preferred recruiter(s) with a job description and expect screened candidates to be sent to you. Overall, this process continues to serve as a highly scalable option in many talent acquisition strategms, but it is extremely costly. Moreover, based on the transactional nature of the relationship, it comes with high risk and little accountability for results.
Companies soon realised they could bring the same talent in-house as contractors—their intentions clearly centered on achieving the same scalability but with reduced cost and greater control of the outcomes. In practice though, this model proved to be almost as expensive as high agency utilisation and surprisingly, with co-employment and other new issues, even more complex. Worse yet, the rates for contractors continued to climb as corporate recruiters began to seek out these new, more highly paid "nomad" positions instead of their corporate roles. The desired "direct sourcing" impact these recruiters were supposed to have never materialized as skills, and innovative approaches floundered without the access to best practices and innovative techniques that contingency recruiting agencies cultivated.
At the same time, traditional recruiting providers began to assume a more prominent role in assisting their customers with new ways to handle huge spikes in hiring. Although this represented a new challenge for both companies and providers, the solutions were primarily project-based and, therefore, rarely focused on achieving strategtc improvements.
Over time, the RPO paradigm changed to finally justify its title, while providers literally began assuming delivery of an organisation’s internal staffing function. This early model was fraught with mistiming because most organisations treated RPO solutions like earlier transactional recruiting solutions. In addition, most providers simply weren’t ready to deliver at the levels they had signed up for. As the burgeoning industry learns from itself, organisations have honed their approach to RPO vendor management and some providers have refined their solutions to near industry-standard levels.
Traditional recruiting providers didn’t make strategic progress because
选项
A、they adopted new ways to help companies.
B、the solutions focused on project.
C、they didn’t find customers.
D、they had no access to best practices and innovative techniques.
答案
B
解析
文中第五段提到“Although this represented a new challenge for both companies and providers, the solutions were primarily project-based and, therefore, rarely focused on achieving strategic improvements.”即:虽然这对公司和招聘服务提供商来说是个新的挑战,但是这些解决方案主要是以项目为基础的,因此,很少把注意力集中到取得战略性的进步上。所以,B项符合题意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/zo7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
Whatdidthemandorecently?
Whathasthecompanyrecentlydone?
Accordingtothespeaker,whatdidthemayorrecentlydo?
Whattypeoffacilitywasrecentlybuilt?
Whywasthewomanbusyrecently?
Whattypeoffacilitywasrecentlybuilt?
随机试题
A.病变以脑底部最明显B.病变以脑顶部最明显C.病变以大脑灰质最明显D.病变以脊髓灰质前角最明显流行性乙型脑炎
男性,25岁。咽痛、发热l天后出现肉眼血尿,无尿频、尿痛、尿急。化验尿蛋白阴性,尿沉渣镜检RBC满视野/HP。(2014年第104题)若诊断确定,处理方案是
A.大肠埃希菌性肠炎B.病毒性肠炎C.金黄色葡萄球菌肠炎D.真菌性肠炎E.生理性腹泻患儿乳食正常,体重增长正常,形体虚胖,大便4~5次/天,绿色稀便,伴有湿疹。应首先考虑的是
经济制度
工作计量器具是工作岗位上使用的,不用于进行量值传递而是直接用来()被测对象量值的计量器具。
两个以上不同资质等级的单位实行联合承包时,应按照()的业务许可范围承揽工程。
音响的物理学基础是()
发现教学模式的指导思想是
关于公开市场业务,下列说法错误的是()。
(2014年)设f(x)是周期为4的可导奇函数,且f′(x)=2(x一1),x∈[0,2],则f(7)=___________。
最新回复
(
0
)