首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Watchdogs are growling at the web giants, and sometimes biting them. European data-protection agencies wrote to Google, Microsof
Watchdogs are growling at the web giants, and sometimes biting them. European data-protection agencies wrote to Google, Microsof
admin
2012-12-30
25
问题
Watchdogs are growling at the web giants, and sometimes biting them. European data-protection agencies wrote to Google, Microsoft and Yahoo! demanding independent proof that they were making promised changes to protect the privacy of users’ search history. They also urged Google to store sensitive search data for only six months instead of nine.
Ten privacy and data-protection commissioners from countries including Canada, Germany and Britain wrote a public letter to Eric Schmidt, Google’s boss, demanding changes in Google Buzz, the firm’s social-networking service, which had been criticised for dipping into users’ Gmail accounts to find "followers" for them without clearly explaining what it was doing. Google promptly complied.
Such run-ins with regulators are likely to multiply and limit the freedom of global Internet firms. It is not just that online privacy has become a controversial issue. More importantly, privacy rules are national, but data flows lightly and instantly across borders, often thanks to companies like Google and Fa-cebook, which manage vast databases.
A recent scandal dubbed "Wi-Figate" exemplifies the problem. Google (accidentally, it insists) gathered data from unsecured Wi-Fi networks in people’s homes as part of a project to capture images of streets around the world. A number of regulators launched investigations. Yet their reaction varied widely, even within the European Union, where member states have supposedly aligned their stance on online privacy. Some European regulators ordered Google to preserve the data it had collected in their bailiwicks; others demanded that information related to their countries be destroyed.
Despite such differences within Europe, the gap is much greater between Europe and America, home to many of the world’s largest online social networks and search engines. European regulations are inspired by the conviction that data privacy is a fundamental human right and that individuals should be in control of how their data are used. America, on the other hand, takes a more relaxed view, allowing people to use consumer-protection laws to seek redress if they feel their privacy has been violated. Companies that handle users’ data are largely expected to police themselves.
Some experts say this dichotomy explains why Silicon Valley firms that strike out abroad have sometimes been the targets of European Union data watchdogs. Jules Polonetsky of the Future of Privacy Forum, a think tank, says that many American firms have yet to learn that showing up in Europe and extolling the virtues of self-regulation is likely to be as ineffective as rightwing politicians denouncing antidiscrimination laws back home.
Transatlantic friction between companies and regulators has grown as Europe’s data guardians have become more assertive. Francesca Bignami, a professor at George Washington University’s law school, says that the explosion of digital technologies has made it impossible for watchdogs to keep a close eye on every web company operating in their backyard. So instead they are relying more on scapegoating prominent wrongdoers in the hope that this will deter others.
But regulators such as Peter Schaar, who heads Germany’s federal data-protection agency, say the gulf is exaggerated. Some European countries, he points out, now have rules that make companies who suffer big losses of customer data to report these to the authorities. The inspiration for these measures comes from America.
Yet even Mr. Schaar admits that the Internet’s global scale means that there will need to be changes on both sides of the Atlantic. He hints that Europe might adopt a more flexible regulatory stance if America were to create what amounts to an independent data-protection body along European lines. In Europe, where the flagship Data Protection Directive came into effect in 1995, before firms such as Google and Facebook were even founded, the European Commission is conducting a review of its privacy policies. In America, Congress has begun debating a new privacy bill and the Federal Trade Commission is considering an overhaul of its rules. David Vladeck.the head of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, has acknowledged that "existing privacy frameworks have limitations".
Even if America and Europe do narrow their differences, Internet firms will still have to grapple with other data watchdogs. In Asia, countries that belong to APEC are trying to develop a set of regional guidelines for privacy rules under an initiative known as the Data Privacy Pathfinder. Some countries such as Australia and New Zealand have longstanding privacy laws, but many emerging nations have yet to roll out fully fledged versions of their own. Mr. Polonetsky sees Asia as "a new privacy battleground", with America and Europe both keen to tempt countries towards their own regulatory model. Shoehorning such firms into antiquated privacy frameworks will not benefit either them or their users.
It can be inferred from the passage that
选项
A、Americans pay less attention to their privacy than Europeans.
B、American firms should be more careful to collect data in Europe.
C、European regulators attempt to ban American firms of data collection.
D、European web giants welcome the regulations of European watchdogs.
答案
B
解析
推断题。根据试题顺序从第五段开始继续浏览下文。第六段首句指出“Some experts say thisdichotomy explains why Silicon Valley firms that strike out abroad have sometimes been the targetsof European Union data watchdogs.”,末句对该句做进一步解释:许多美国公司还不知道在欧洲开辟市场的同时高唱自我管理的优点,极可能像国内右翼政客指责反歧视法一样无效。即欧洲监管严格,在收集数据时需要格外注意遵守当地的监管法律,由此可以推断出[B],故为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/0VaO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
IntheUnitedStates,charterschoolsprovidealternativesto"regular"publicschools.Unlikemostpublicschools,chartersdon
TheAmericanFamilyWe’lllearntheAmericanfamiliesfromthefollowingfiveaspects:1.Familystructures1)Immediatefamily
TheAmericanFamilyWe’lllearntheAmericanfamiliesfromthefollowingfiveaspects:1.Familystructures1)Immediatefamily
WhichofthefollowingwastheMasterpieceofJohnSteinbeck?
In17th-centuryNewEngland,almosteveryonebelievedinwitches.Strugglingtosurviveinavastandsometimesunforgivingland
Beguninthelate1960sbyPentagonweaponsresearchersasasystemforeasingcommunicationbetweencomputersindisparateelec
SevenTypesofEvidenceItisimportanttolearntouseevidenceinargumentativewriting,becausewithoutevidence,youcan’t
SevenTypesofEvidenceItisimportanttolearntouseevidenceinargumentativewriting,becausewithoutevidence,youcan’t
A"scientistic"viewoflanguagewasdominantamongphilosophersandlinguistswhoaffectedtodevelopascientificanalysisof
AbreakthroughintheprovisionofenergyfromthesunfortheEuropeanEconomicCommunity(EEC)couldbebroughtforwardbyup
随机试题
凡属于法院审判工作中具体应用法律、法令的问题,由最高人民法院解释。()
制剂中药物化学降解的途径有()。
某有限责任公司在成立前由出资人共同推荐董事候选人,在审查各候选人情况时,发现其中有些人不能担任董事,他们是:
已知通过一导体环的磁通量在0.04s内由8×10-3wb均匀地减小到2×10-3wb。若环的平面法线与磁场方向一致,则环中产生的感应电动势为()。
关于施工成本及其管理的说法,正确的是()。
(操作员:李主管;账套:101账套;操作日期:2014年1月31日)对所有应付单.生成凭证。
请仔细阅读下列材料,并根据作答要求作文。春运期间我和好友幸运地订到了回家的火车票,上车后却发现一位老人坐在我们的位子上,好友示意我先坐老人旁边的位子,却没有请老人让出座位,我坐下后发现老人右脚有一点不方便,才了解好友不请他让出座位的原因。由于火
以下叙述中正确的是______。
在数据库设计中,将E-R图转换成关系数据模型的过程属于
A、Ithasbrokendownbefore.B、Shegenerallydoesn’tallowpeopletoborrowit.C、Sheistryingtosellit,D、Sheboughtitfrom
最新回复
(
0
)