首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Hypothesis-driven research is at the heart of scientific endeavor, and it is often the positive, confirmatory data that get the
Hypothesis-driven research is at the heart of scientific endeavor, and it is often the positive, confirmatory data that get the
admin
2014-06-25
40
问题
Hypothesis-driven research is at the heart of scientific endeavor, and it is often the positive, confirmatory data that get the most attention and guide further research. But many studies produce non-confirmatory data—observations that refute current ideas and carefully constructed hypotheses. And it can be argued that these "negative data," far from having little value in science, are actually an integral part of scientific progress that deserve more attention.
At first glance, this may seem a little nonsensical; after all, how can non-confirmatory results help science to progress when they fail to substantiate anything? But in fact, in a philosophical sense, only negative data resulting in rejection of a hypothesis represent real progress. As philosopher of science Karl Popper stated; "Every refutation should be regarded as a great success; not merely a success of the scientist who refuted the theory, but also of the scientist who created the refuted theory and who thus in the first instance suggested, if only indirectly, the refuting experiment. "
On a more practical level, Journal of Negative Results in Biomedicine(JNRBM)was launched on the premise that scientific progress depends not only on the accomplishments of individuals but requires teamwork and open communication of all results -positive and negative. After all, the scientific community can only learn from negative results if the data are published.
Though not every negative result will turn out to be of groundbreaking significance, it is imperative to be aware of the more balanced perspective that can result from the publication of non-confirmatory findings. The first and most obvious benefits of publishing negative results are a reduction in the duplication of effort between researchers, leading to the acceleration of scientific progress, and greater transparency and openness.
More broadly, publication of negative data might also contribute to a more realistic appreciation of the "messy" nature of science. Scientific endeavors rarely result in perfect discoveries of elements of "truth" about the world. This is largely because they are frequently based on methods with real limitations and hypotheses based on uncertain premises.
It is perhaps this "messy" aspect of science that contributes to a hesitation within the scientific community to publish negative data. In an ever more competitive environment, it may be that scientific journals prefer to publish studies with clear and specific conclusions. Indeed, Daniele Fanelli of the University of Edinburgh suggests that results may be distorted by a "publish or perish" culture in which the progress of scientific careers depends on the frequency and quality of citations. This leads to a situation in which data that support a hypothesis may be perceived in a more positive light and receive more citations than data that only generate more questions and uncertainty.
Despite the effects of this competitive environment, however, a willingness to publish negative data is emerging among researchers. Publications that emphasize positive findings are of course useful, but a more balanced presentation of all the data, including negative or failed experiments, would also make a significant contribution to scientific progress.
Which of the following statements is true according to the first paragraph?
选项
A、Negative data lies at the core of scientific progress.
B、Non-confirmatory data are not receiving corresponding attention.
C、The mission of hypothesis-driven research is to reject current ideas.
D、Confirmatory data are the major stimulus to further research.
答案
B
解析
该段首句指出现实情况:那些正向的、验证性数据最受关注。随后表明自己观点:那些负向数据同样有意义.理应得到(deserve more attention)更多重视,据此可推知人们没有赋予负向(非验证性)数据应有的重视,[B]选项正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/2GK4777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Accordingtoexperts,hidingbehindbedcurtainstoavoiddisturbancemayhinderstudents’interpersonalcommunication.Writea
Happinessisfashionablethesedays.Yetshouldweacceptthecommonviewthatthenew"science"ofhappinesshascementedthes
(46)OneideathateliteuniversitieslikeYale,sprawlingpublicsystemslikeWisconsinandsmallerprivatecollegeslikeLewis
In2004GoogleunveiledGmail:apowerfule-mailaccountwithagigabyteofstorage.Thatwas500timeswhatHotmailwasofferin
Yourschool’sStudentUnionisofferingEnglishtutoringservicestochildrenatasmallfee.AsamemberoftheStudentUnion,
Whatcanbeinferredfromthesentence"it’stheaccountholderwhomaygetburned"(Paragraph1)?Accordingtobankingexecuti
NewYorkTimeswasnotcriticizedbytheconservativebecauseofbeing______.Thefifthparagraphimplies______.
Expertshavelearnedfromstudyingotherdisasters,suchasOklahomaCitybombing,the【C1】______ofSept.11andthe【C2】______of
Expertshavelearnedfromstudyingotherdisasters,suchasOklahomaCitybombing,the【C1】______ofSept.11andthe【C2】______of
Everyonehassufferedfromheadaches,but【C1】______recentlymedicalresearcherswerenotcertainwhatcausedthem.Blewresearch
随机试题
已知学生关系:学生(学号,姓名,年龄,住址)。若有SQL查询语句“SELECT姓名,年龄FROM学生WHERE住址=江苏”,则该语句对学生关系进行了________________操作。
7个月婴儿,体重5kg,身长66cm,腹部皮下脂肪0.3cm,好哭、多汗,应考虑为()
患者,女,65岁。因阵发性胸闷8年,持续胸痛8小时被收入院。入院时患者血压为150/90mmHg,诊断急性前壁心肌梗死。住院第2日患者出现胸闷、大汗、面色苍白,体检:心率126次/分,律齐,双肺未闻及干湿性啰音,血压90/60mmHg,考虑合并心源性休
女,平素体健,因交通事故致骨盆骨折。查体:神清,反应稍迟钝,面色苍白,脉搏120次/分,血压90/70mmHg,Hb70g/L。首选的治疗方案是输注
王某经营着一家服装厂,且为某县公用事业管理局局长李某的侄女婿。2005年至2006年,王某找到该县公用事业管理局副局长岑某,给其2万元现金,希望通过岑某主管污水处理厂办公楼建设的便利条件,使个体户建筑商林某取得该建筑工程的水电改造工程,岑某收下钱但未有其他
冲击式水轮机按射流冲击转轮的方式不同可分为( )。
帆拱是何种建筑风格的主要成就?()
下列各项中,不属于《新巴塞尔资本协议》中“三大支柱”的是()。
习近平强调,要把培育和弘扬社会主义核心价值观作为一项重要工程,使之成为人们日常工作生活的基本遵循。重视培育和弘扬社会主义核心价值观的根据是()。①价值观作为一种理想追求,决定人类社会的前途和命运②价值观作为对事物价值总的看法,决定事物的性质和价值
一、注意事项1.申论考试,与传统作文考试不同,是对分析驾驭材料的能力与对表达能力并重的考试。2.作答参考时限:阅读材料40分钟,作答110分钟。3.仔细阅读给定的资料,按照后面提出的“申论要求”依次作答。二、给定资料(1)
最新回复
(
0
)