首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Of all the catastrophes that could befall America in coming years, a big terrorist attack, perhaps even bigger than those on Sep
Of all the catastrophes that could befall America in coming years, a big terrorist attack, perhaps even bigger than those on Sep
admin
2010-12-21
40
问题
Of all the catastrophes that could befall America in coming years, a big terrorist attack, perhaps even bigger than those on September 11 th 2001, may be more likely than others. Who would pay for the millions in property damage, business losses and other claims from such an attack?
This is the question with which America’s Congress is currently wrestling. The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) was passed as a temporary measure after September 11th to provide a government back-stop for the insurance industry in the event of a catastrophic attack. It now says government can step in when insured losses from a terrorist event top $5m. TRIA has helped to stabilize the market, and enabled insurers to continue offering terrorism-risk cover even after swallowing the big losses imposed by September llth. But unless Congress acts last, TRIA will expire at the end of the year. One likely result is the loss of terrorism-risk cover for thousands of firms and property owners. This, in turn, could disrupt businesses and make some commercial activity impossible. With modifications, TRIA should be extended.
The Bush administration has been opposed to extension. It has always seen TRIA as a short-term measure, and has argued that the private sector should assume sole responsibility for terrorism insurance. This is the right goal. A purely private solution would be best, lifting any future burden-from the taxpayer and relying on the industry to price and spread risks more accurately than any government can do. But relying entirely on the private sector immediately does not look feasible. With TRIA’s expiration looming, insurers and reinsurers have not, as the administration expected, rushed to write new contracts for next year offering to fall gaps in terrorism cover.
Why the hesitation? Unlike other risks, the threat of terrorism cannot be forecast in time or scope, making a mocker’:" of insurers’ underwriting models. A big chemical, biological or nuclear attack is a prospect few can price, or afford to cover. Insurers are already being threatened with downgrades by rating agencies for the terrorism cover they have sold.
One reason is that insurance, far from being a free market, is already one of the most heavily regulated of industries. Operating in a highly distorted marketplace, with 50 state regulators, the insurance industry seems to be having trouble pricing the largest of terrorism risks in a way that is credible and can still offer insurers a profit. Letting TRIA expire, and abruptly withdrawing the government role in insuring the largest losses, would just exacerbate this problem.
Any renewal of TRIA should, once again, be limited to two years, say. Its extension must also shift more of the burden, and the business, to the private sector. If an extension is agreed and TRIA’s threshold for government intervention is raised substantially, work should begin now to find better longer-term solutions. One place to look is abroad, where governments have dealt with terrorism risk for years. In Britain, for instance, insurers have created a pool of capital that is backed by the government and, over time, shifts a greater share of risk on to the private sector. Other options to consider include tax changes that reduce the cost of holding capital by insurers and reinsurers, and facilitating the use of catastrophe bonds.
With fewer regulatory distortions of insurance markets, a solely private solution may be attainable in the long run. In the current environment, though, the same government that regularly warns of terrorist threats must still have a role to play in a solution that safeguards America’s financial security. It would be better to plan ahead than wait for a rushed, Katrina-style bail-out after a big attack. Amid all the uncertainties, one thing seems clear: any such bail-out would be more costly and lead to even greater market distortions without an extension of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act today.
The writer is ______ in developing the argument in this passage.
选项
A、objective
B、emotional
C、disturbed
D、indifferent
答案
A
解析
整篇文章作者只是客观介绍TRIA的运作,发挥的作用以及其延期中应做的修改,并未掺杂个人观点,选项A正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/2Hua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
suicidebombing
Themodernageshowsushowhelplesstheindividualiswhenheisatthemercyofhisunconsciousdrivesand,atthesametime,
initialpublicoffering
MobyDickwaswrittenby().
AllthePresident’sMen______oneoftheimportantbooksforhistorianswhostudytheWatergateScandal.
Theexhibition’simportanceliesinits______:curatorshavegatheredadiversearrayofsignificantworksfrommanydifferent
Mysisterisquite______andplanstogetanM.A.degreewithinoneyear.
AtHarvardUniversity’smostrecentCommencementCeremony,femalePresidentDrewFausthadanimportantreminderforstaffands
WhenJimthrewhisbackoutwhilehelpinghiswifeNancymovethesofa,hefearedthetreatmentthedoctorwouldrecommend,awe
IliveinthelandofDisney,Hollywoodandyear-roundsun.Youmaythinkpeopleinsuchaglamorous,fun-filledplacearehappi
随机试题
编一个C程序,父进程首先设置信号SIGUSR1的处理方法和创建无名管道,再创建一个子进程,然后从键盘上读入一个命令串(如ls-l),并通过无名管道向子进程发送该命令串。之后再向子进程发送软中断信号SIGUSR1,父进程等待子进程终止。子进程读到命令后,睡眠
用科学发展观的全面协调可持续发展的原理谈谈人与人、人与自然、人与社会的关系。
房地产经纪机构的经营战略中,下列关于多向多样化战略类型的说法中不正确的是()。
拟建于某自然保护区内的索道建设项目的建设单位,按照相关规定,建设单位应当在()向公众公告环境影响评价的工作程序和主要工作内容。
工程项目实施阶段的主要工作包括()。
投标保证金的实质是为了避免因()等行为而给招标人造成损失。
用人单位未按规定提出工伤认定申请,工伤职工或者其直系亲属、工会组织在事故伤害发生之日或者被诊断、鉴定为( )之日起1年内,可以直接向用人单位所在地统筹地区劳动保障行政部门提出工伤认定申请。
市场预测的一般过程是()。
根据面试技巧,以下面试官的做法中,不正确的是()。
简述皮亚杰的认知发展理论。
最新回复
(
0
)