首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Of all the catastrophes that could befall America in coming years, a big terrorist attack, perhaps even bigger than those on Sep
Of all the catastrophes that could befall America in coming years, a big terrorist attack, perhaps even bigger than those on Sep
admin
2010-12-21
110
问题
Of all the catastrophes that could befall America in coming years, a big terrorist attack, perhaps even bigger than those on September 11 th 2001, may be more likely than others. Who would pay for the millions in property damage, business losses and other claims from such an attack?
This is the question with which America’s Congress is currently wrestling. The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) was passed as a temporary measure after September 11th to provide a government back-stop for the insurance industry in the event of a catastrophic attack. It now says government can step in when insured losses from a terrorist event top $5m. TRIA has helped to stabilize the market, and enabled insurers to continue offering terrorism-risk cover even after swallowing the big losses imposed by September llth. But unless Congress acts last, TRIA will expire at the end of the year. One likely result is the loss of terrorism-risk cover for thousands of firms and property owners. This, in turn, could disrupt businesses and make some commercial activity impossible. With modifications, TRIA should be extended.
The Bush administration has been opposed to extension. It has always seen TRIA as a short-term measure, and has argued that the private sector should assume sole responsibility for terrorism insurance. This is the right goal. A purely private solution would be best, lifting any future burden-from the taxpayer and relying on the industry to price and spread risks more accurately than any government can do. But relying entirely on the private sector immediately does not look feasible. With TRIA’s expiration looming, insurers and reinsurers have not, as the administration expected, rushed to write new contracts for next year offering to fall gaps in terrorism cover.
Why the hesitation? Unlike other risks, the threat of terrorism cannot be forecast in time or scope, making a mocker’:" of insurers’ underwriting models. A big chemical, biological or nuclear attack is a prospect few can price, or afford to cover. Insurers are already being threatened with downgrades by rating agencies for the terrorism cover they have sold.
One reason is that insurance, far from being a free market, is already one of the most heavily regulated of industries. Operating in a highly distorted marketplace, with 50 state regulators, the insurance industry seems to be having trouble pricing the largest of terrorism risks in a way that is credible and can still offer insurers a profit. Letting TRIA expire, and abruptly withdrawing the government role in insuring the largest losses, would just exacerbate this problem.
Any renewal of TRIA should, once again, be limited to two years, say. Its extension must also shift more of the burden, and the business, to the private sector. If an extension is agreed and TRIA’s threshold for government intervention is raised substantially, work should begin now to find better longer-term solutions. One place to look is abroad, where governments have dealt with terrorism risk for years. In Britain, for instance, insurers have created a pool of capital that is backed by the government and, over time, shifts a greater share of risk on to the private sector. Other options to consider include tax changes that reduce the cost of holding capital by insurers and reinsurers, and facilitating the use of catastrophe bonds.
With fewer regulatory distortions of insurance markets, a solely private solution may be attainable in the long run. In the current environment, though, the same government that regularly warns of terrorist threats must still have a role to play in a solution that safeguards America’s financial security. It would be better to plan ahead than wait for a rushed, Katrina-style bail-out after a big attack. Amid all the uncertainties, one thing seems clear: any such bail-out would be more costly and lead to even greater market distortions without an extension of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act today.
The writer is ______ in developing the argument in this passage.
选项
A、objective
B、emotional
C、disturbed
D、indifferent
答案
A
解析
整篇文章作者只是客观介绍TRIA的运作,发挥的作用以及其延期中应做的修改,并未掺杂个人观点,选项A正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/2Hua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
shoulder
EtonCollegeisa________.
受“USgovernmentshutdown”影响,美国零售销售、消费者和经济信心,以及抵押贷款申请等都呈现出了疲软趋势。USgovernmentshutdown
“碳足迹”(“Carbonfootprint”)是当下媒体中经常出现的词汇,其具体所指是()。
Thetransitionfromforesttotreelesstundraonamountainslopeisoftenadramaticone.Withinaverticaldistanceofjusta
Agedjustfour,JosephineHawkinsisalreadyateasewithhercomputerandtheinternet,______clickinghermouseonDisneysit
Youhadthe______situationinwhichLuxembourghadmorelistedpublicbathingbeachesthanthewholeoftheUnitedKingdom.
ThemostAwidelydiscussedalternativetothetraditionalcampusistheInternetUniversity—Bavoluntarycommunitytoscholars/
Shewasextremelylucky;whenhergreat-uncledied,she______afortune.
Pressedforfurtherdetails,thechairmanconfessed______thatprofitswouldshowafurtherfall.
随机试题
喷射剩余率是指额定充装状态下的灭火器,在喷射到内部压力与外部环境压力相等时,内部剩余灭火剂量相对于额定充装量的百分比。一般要求是在灭火器的使用温度范围内不大于()%。
某物流公司拟发行面值1500元、期限为5年、票面利率为12%的债券5000张,每年结息一次。发行费用为发行价格的5%,所得税率为40%。计算发行价格为1600元、1500元和1400元时,该债券的资本成本。
社会主义探索时期,我国经济建设的最大成就是()
下列哪种检查是锥体束征()
全厂性火炬应布置在可燃气体的贮罐区、装卸区,以及全厂性重要辅助生产设施及人员集中场所的()。
甲集团是ABC会计师事务所的常年审计客户。A注册会计师负责审计甲集团2014年度财务报表,确定财务报表整体的重要性为200万元。资料一:A注册会计师在审计工作底稿中记录了审计计划,其内容摘录如下:(1)乙公司负责甲集团公司主要原材料的进口业务,通过外
在小组工作中,社会工作者发现有的组员较为被动和沉默,被其他组员忽视,组内因此出现冲突。社会工作者用角色扮演的方法协助组员处理冲突,这有助于()。
根据下列材料,回答以下问题2011年底,全国拥有水上运输船舶17.92万艘,比上年末增长0.5%;净载重量21264.32万吨,增长17.9%;平均净载重量增长17.3%;集装箱箱位147.52万TEU,增长11.4%;船舶功率59万千瓦,增长1
被评估企业拥有2009年发行的两年期债券300张,每张面值100元,年利率为12%。2010年评估时,债券市场上同种同期同面值的债券交易价为110元,该债券的评估值为()。
Theabilitytonegotiatesuccessfully,toreachagreementswithotherpeopleorparties,isakeyskillinanybusiness.Thisne
最新回复
(
0
)