首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The University in transformation, edited by Australian futurists Sohail Inayatullah and Jennifer Gidley, presents some 20 highly
The University in transformation, edited by Australian futurists Sohail Inayatullah and Jennifer Gidley, presents some 20 highly
admin
2011-01-10
102
问题
The University in transformation, edited by Australian futurists Sohail Inayatullah and Jennifer Gidley, presents some 20 highly varied outlooks on tomorrow’s universities by writers representing both Western and non-Western perspectives. Their essays raise a broad range of issues, questioning nearly every key assumption we have about higher education today.
The most widely discussed alternative to the traditional campus is the Internet University— a voluntary community to scholars/teachers physically scattered throughout a country or around the world but all linked in cyberspace. A computerized university could have many advantages, such as easy scheduling, efficient delivery of lectures to thousands or even millions of students at once, and ready access for students everywhere to the resources of all the world’s great libraries.
Yet the Internet University poses dangers, too. For example, a line of franchised courseware, produced by a few superstar teachers, marketed under the brand name of a famous institution, and heavily advertised, might eventually come to dominate the global education market, warns sociology professor Peter Manicas of the University of Hawaii at Manoa. Besides enforcing a rigidly standardized curriculum, such a "college education in a box" could undersell the offerings of many traditional brick and mortar institutions, effectively driving them out of business and throwing thousands of career academics out of work, note Australian communications professors David Rooney and Greg Hearn.
On the other hand, while global connectivity seems highly likely to play some significant role in future higher education, that does not mean greater uniformity in course content—or other dangers—will necessarily follow. Counter-movements are also at work.
Many in academia, including scholars contributing to this volume, are questioning the fundamental mission of university education. What if, for instance, instead of receiving primarily technical training and building theft individual careers, university students and professors could focus their learning and research efforts on existing problems in their local communities and the world? Feminist scholar Ivana Milojevic dares to dream what a university might become "if we believed that child-care workers and teachers in early childhood education should be one of the highest (rather than lowest) paid professionals?"
Co-editor Jennifer Gidley shows how tomorrow’s university faculty, instead of giving lectures and conducting independent research, may take on three new roles. Some would act as brokers, assembling customized degree-credit programmes for individual students by mixing and matching the best course offerings available from institutions all around the world. A second group, mentors, would function much like today’s faculty advisers, but are likely to be working with many more students outside their own academic specialty. This would require them to constantly be learning from their students as well as instructing them.
A third new role for faculty, and in Gidley’s view the most challenging and rewarding of all, would be as meaning-makers: charismatic sages and practitioners leading groups of students/colleagues in collaborative efforts to find spiritual as well as rational and technological solutions to specific real-world problems.
Moreover, there seems little reason to suppose that any one form of university must necessarily drive out all other options. Students may be "enrolled" in courses offered at virtual campuses on the Internet, between—or even during—sessions at a real-world problem-focused institution.
As co-editor Sohail Inayatullah points out in his introduction, no future is inevitable, and the very act of imagining and thinking through alternative possibilities can directly affect how thoughtfully, creatively and urgently even a dominant technology is adapted and applied. Even in academia, the future belongs to those who care enough to work their visions into practical, sustainable realities.
According to the review, what is the fundamental mission of traditional university education?
选项
A、Knowledge learning and career building.
B、Learning how to solve existing social problems.
C、Researching into Solutions to current world problems.
D、Combining research efforts of teachers and students in learning.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/2ncO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
______isnecessaryforpeopletodevelopstrongbonesandteeth.
Thisreflectstheprioritybeingattachedtoeconomicoverpoliticalactivity,partlycausedbyagrowingreluctancetoentera
Richardhasan______manner,althoughhecomesfromamiddle-classfamilybackgroundandhasreceivedhiseducationatCambridge.
Thefieldofmedicinehasalwaysattracteditsshareofquacksandcharlatans—disreputablewomenandmenwithlittleornomed
Thisprogramwilltakekidswhohaveamanifesthistoryofviolentacts.
Oneoftheeffectivewaystolessenenvironmentalpollutionisthereservationandprotectionofmoreswamps.
Whatactually________agoodangle—oragoodselfoverall—isrootedinwhatweconsiderbeautiful.
实行改革开放以来,中国进入了发展最快、进步最大、变化最深刻的历史时期。1979年至2003年,中国经济年均增长9.4%,居民消费水平年均提高7%,进出口总额年均增长16%,成为世界上发展最快的国家之一。2003年,拥有13亿人口的中国,人均国内生产总值第一
我想谈一下全球经济增长与宏观政策作用之间的关系。我先来回顾一下全球经济。全球经济的表现比一年前人们所担心的要好得多了,现在预计全球经济增长今年将达到4.5%,为五年以来的最高水平。美国再一次成为全球经济增长的主动力,但是中国急速的工业化进程也刺激了全球的经
随机试题
当a=4,b=5,c=7,d=6时,执行下面一段程序:if(a<b)if(c<d)x=1;elseif(a<c)if(b<c)x=2;el
某患者,因长期摄入维生素A不足而导致夜盲症,其发生的原因是
《素问.刺热》中,心在面部的分属部位为
AA常合并肝功能损害,可酌情选用
连续工作负载平稳的机械应采用()的电动机,其额定功率应按机械的轴功率选择。
在360度考评中,主观性最强的维度是()。(2007年5月二级真题)
公司法人资格的取得始于( )。
Whereisthewomangoing?
Whichwordistheoddoneout?London,Paris,Dublin,TheHague,Vienna
MildweatherhasbroughtJapan’smuch-lovedcherrytreesinto(36)______twoweeksearlythisyear,butnoteveryoneis(37)____
最新回复
(
0
)