首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Science has few more controversial topics than human intelligence—in particular, whether variations in it are a result of nature
Science has few more controversial topics than human intelligence—in particular, whether variations in it are a result of nature
admin
2021-02-21
110
问题
Science has few more controversial topics than human intelligence—in particular, whether variations in it are a result of nature or nurture, and especially whether such variations differ between the sexes. The mines in this field can blow up an entire career, as Larry Summers found out in 2005 when he spoke of the hypothesis that the mathematical aptitude needed for physics and engineering, as well as for maths itself, is innately rarer in women than in men. He resigned as president of Harvard University shortly afterwards.
It is bold, therefore, of Jonathan Wai, Martha Putallaz and Matthew Makel, of Duke University in North Carolina, to enter the argument with a paper that addresses both questions. In this paper, they describe how they sifted through nearly three decades of standardised tests administered to American high-school students to see what had been happening to the country’s brightest sparks. They draw two conclusions. One is that a phenomenon called the Flynn effect applies in particular to the brightest of the bright. The other is that part, but not all, of the historic difference between the brainiest men and women has vanished.
The three researchers drew their data from Duke University’s Talent Identification Programme, TIP, which is designed to discover especially clever candidates early on: all the participants had scored in the top 5% of ability when confronted with exams designed for much older students. TIP, in turn, draws on three national exams: SAT, EXPLORE and ACT.
In the early 1980s, the ratio of males to females in the top 0.01% of maths scores in SAT, the Scholastic Aptitude Test, was around 13 to 1. By the early 1990s, it had fallen to four to one. After this, however, it remained unaltered.
It is clear that the rise itself must be "nurture" of some sort, but the subsequent stasis could have either explanation. A line of reasoning in favour of "nature" is that put forward by Simon Baron-Cohen, a psychologist at Cambridge University. This connects the extreme systematising patterns of thought which make a good mathematician with the advantage of men among those with Asperger’s syndrome, a form of autism that does not harm a person’s general intelligence. But the difference could equally well be the result of some as-yet-unclear difference between the ways girls and boys are brought up.
That such unclear environmental influences can have real effects on IQ is eloquently illustrated by the Flynn effect. This phenomenon, brought to the world’s attention in the 1980s by James Flynn of the University of Otago, in New Zealand, is that average IQs around the world have been rising at the rate of 0.3 points a year for the past eight decades. Using the TIP data, Dr Wai and his colleagues showed that this is as true of the brightest youngsters in American society as it is of lesser mortals, suggesting that even they can have their abilities boosted by whatever is causing the Flynn effect. Once again, the changes seem to be mainly in mathematics. Scores in the brightest children’s verbal-reasoning and reading abilities demonstrate no clear trend, but all three national tests show sustained improvements in their mathematical ability over the past three decades.
[A] aims to find out extraordinarily smart people based on three exams in America.
[B] shows, with colleagues, that general IQs of the cleverest youngsters have been rising.
[C] assumes that genetically, there is an inequality in mathematical ability between sexes.
[D] presents that there are some relationships between intelligence and Asperger’s syndrome.
[E] shows that IQ has been rising on average under environmental influences.
[F] finds an inequality in mathematical ability between sexes according to his research.
[G] concludes, with his colleagues, that intelligent difference between sexes doesn’t change.
TIP
选项
答案
A
解析
TIP出现在第三段和最后一段,解题句在第三段。该段讲到,人才识别项目(TIP)的目标是找出特别聪明的参与者,TIP因此借用了3项国家级考试:SAT、EXPLORE和ACT。A中的aims to find out是原文is designed to discover的转述,extraordinarily smart people与文中的especially clever candidates同义,故确定A为本题答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/41Y4777K
0
考研英语二
相关试题推荐
Excitement,fatigue,andanxietycanallbedetectedfromsomeone’sblinks,accordingtopsychologistJohnStern(21)Washington
Accordingtothepassage,thefactthatyoungpeopleseemtobelosinginterestinscience______.Whichofthefollowingstate
Youstillneedsomesubstantialexamples______supportofyourargument,orfewpeoplewillbelieveinyouridea.
Overthepastdecade,manycompanieshadperfectedtheartofcreatingautomaticbehaviors-habits-amongconsumers.Thesehabits
Overthepastdecade,manycompanieshadperfectedtheartofcreatingautomaticbehaviors-habits-amongconsumers.Thesehabits
Mosthumanbeingsactuallydecidebeforetheythink.Whenanyhumanbeing—executive,specializedexpert,orpersoninthestreet
KimiyukiSudashouldbeaperfectcustomerforJapan’scar-makers.He’sayoung,successfulexecutiveatanInternet-servicesco
Socialscientistshavebeentryingtoidentifytheconditionsmostlikelytopromotesatisfyinghumanlives.Theirfindingsgive
Manypeopletaketosocialmediatosharenewsofbigevents.OnDecember1stFacebook’sboss,MarkZuckerberg,followedinthe
RaeandBruceHostetlernotonlyworkveryhard,theyalsorelaxjustaswell.NumerousvacationshelpthesuburbanIndianapolis
随机试题
源程序通过编译程序的处理可以一次性地产生高效运行的目的程序,并把它保存在磁盘上,以备多次执行。()
A、随机误差B、比例误差C、恒定误差D、系统误差E、总误差回收实验评估的是
一正常小儿的身长是90cm,乳牙20个,腕部骨化中心4个,其年龄大约是
女性,35岁。颈前区肿块10年,近年来易出汗、心悸,渐感呼吸困难。体检:晨起心率104次/分,BP120/60mmHg;无突眼,甲状腺Ⅲ度肿大,结节状,心电图示窦性心律不齐。最佳的治疗方法是
N件产品中有M件次品,从中任取n件,则n件产品中恰有k件次品的概率为()。
歌舞娱乐放映游艺场所设置在地下一层时,地下一层地面与室外出入口地坪的高差不应大于()m。
处于前运算阶段的儿童的特征包括()。
(2011)教师不得对学生进行谩骂、体罚、变相体罚和其他侮辱行为。这是由学生的()决定的。
简述系统测试的主要内容。
A、Hetendstoletthingspileup.B、Helovestomakealotofadjustments.C、Hegetstooclosetoco-workers.D、Hetendstobea
最新回复
(
0
)