首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
This past September, Apple released new iPhone models without headphone jacks. The people were not pleased. "It’s eliminating a
This past September, Apple released new iPhone models without headphone jacks. The people were not pleased. "It’s eliminating a
admin
2018-07-30
57
问题
This past September, Apple released new iPhone models without headphone jacks. The people were not pleased. "It’s eliminating a connector and adding inconvenience in the name of profit," one commenter wrote. "Apple wants to see just how stupid the public really is," said another. " There is absolutely no reason to get rid of a perfectly working universal headphone jack," added a third.
As it turns out, there is a reason. The plug itself is small. But the corresponding receptacle on the inside of the phone is relatively enormous. By removing it, Apple says, it was able to fit in a bigger battery, giving the iPhone 7 two more hours of life per charge, a stabilized camera for fewer blurry photographs and stereo speakers.
Apple includes, in the box, both a new pair of earbuds and a two-inch adapter for existing headphones. But those wired approaches are meant to be stopgap measures until we all buy wireless headphones, which now cost as little as $ 17.
Apple’s inclination to kill of "standard" components in the name of progress is no surprise. This, after all, was the company that famously eliminated floppy drives, CD-ROM drives and dial-up modems. And it got rid of physical keyboards on smartphones. It has discontinued a series of its own connectors, such as ADB, SCSI, Fire Wire and the original iPhone charging jack. And every single time, the public is outraged.
So the pattern is now clear: The tech companies change some way of doing something. The public screams bloody murder. But a couple of years later we’ve all adopted the new technology and forgotten the old one. It’s probably been years since you pined for the blistering speed of a dial-up modem and a decade since you wished you had a floppy drive. Does that mean we’re stupid and nearsighted? Not exactly. In the case of tech, there’s a cost to each of these changes. There’s a monetary cost, of course. By the time the industry abandoned the floppy-disk and CD-ROM standards, our collections of those disks were rendered worthless. And in the case of the disappearing headphone jack, there will be the cost of new wireless earbuds. There’s also a learning cost. Every time someone takes away a skill we’ve mastered and introduces one we haven’t, that’s a time-consuming challenge. There’s even a convenience cost.
During the transitional period to the new standard, we often have to buy and carry some bridge technology, such as external DVD drives, USB modems — or headphone-jack adapters. Above all, though, there’s a psychological cost to change, a helpless, primitive "Who moved my cheese?" reaction. As a species, we don’t like lifestyle changes even if logic tells us that we should make them. (See also: climate change, diet, smoking.)
That’s because, at its heart, change means leaping into the unknown. And the unknown — as our Neandertal ancestors approaching a dark cave could have told you — is frightening. The big tech companies will always want to swat their public along into the future. In the end, resistance is futile — but it’s also entirely understandable.
选项
答案
This past September, Apple released new iPhone models without headphone jacks. The people were not pleased.
"It’s eliminating a connector and adding inconvenience in the name of profit," one commenter wrote. " Apple wants to see just how stupid the public really is," said another. " There is absolutely no reason to get rid of a perfectly working universal headphone jack," added a third.
As it turns out, there is a reason.
The plug itself is small. But the corresponding receptacle on the inside of the phone is relatively enormous.
By removing it, Apple says, it was able to fit in a bigger battery, giving the iPhone 7 two more hours of life per charge,
a stabilized camera for fewer blurry photographs and stereo speakers. Apple includes, in the box, both a new pair of earbuds and a two-inch adapter for existing headphones. But those wired approaches are meant to be stopgap measures until we all buy
wireless headphones, which now cost as little as $ 17.
Apple’s inclination to kill of "standard" components in the name of progress is no surprise.
This, after all, was the company that famously eliminated floppy drives, CD-ROM drives and dial-up modems. And it got rid of physical keyboards on smartphones. It has discontinued a series of its own connectors, such as ADB, SCSI, Fire Wire and the original iPhone charging jack. And every single time, the public is outraged.
So the pattern is now clear; The tech companies change some way of doing something.
The public screams bloody murder.
But a couple of years later we’ve all adopted the new technology and forgotten the old one.
It’s probably been years since you pined for the blistering speed of a dial-up modem and a decade since you fished you had a floppy drive. Does that mean we’re stupid and nearsighted? Not exactly. In the case of tech ,
there’s a cost to each of these changes. There’s a monetary cost,
of course. By the time the industry abandoned the floppy-disk and CD-ROM standards, our collections of those disks were rendered worthless. And in the case of
the disappearing headphone jack, there will be the cost of new wireless earbuds. There’s also a learning cost.
Every time
someone takes away a skill we’ve mastered and introduces one we haven’t
, that’s a time-consuming challenge.
There’s even a convenience cost.
During the transitional period to the new standard, we often have to buy and carry some bridge technology
, such as external
DVD drives, U. S. B modems
— or
headphone-jack adapters.
Above all, though ,
there’s a psychological cost to change,
a helpless, primitive "Who moved my cheese?" reaction. As a species, we don’t like lifestyle changes even if logic tells us that we should make them. (See also: climate change, diet, smoking.) That’s because, at its heart ,
change means leaping into the unknown.
And the unknown — as our Neandertal ancestors approaching a dark cave could have told you — is frightening.
The big tech companies will always want to swat their public along into the future.
In the end,
resistance is futile — but it’s also entirely understandable.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/4c0O777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级口译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级口译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Thecampers______theirtentinashelteredvalley.
Socialcontrolreferstosocialprocesses,plannedorunplanned,bywhichpeoplearetaught,persuaded,orforcedtoconformto
Questionsofeducationarefrequentlydiscussedasiftheyborenorelationtothesocialsysteminwhichandforwhichtheeduc
Thesuntodayisayellowdwarfstar.Itisfueledbythermonuclearreactionsnearitscenterthatconverthydrogentohelium.T
Onecannarrowthesearchbyspecifyingtherangeofemployees,revenueandexportfigures,acceptingonlythosecompaniesthat
Inthepopularmind,theInternetistherealizationoftheglobalvillage,wheretheflowofinformationandideasisunimpeded
Inthepopularmind,theInternetistherealizationoftheglobalvillage,wheretheflowofinformationandideasisunimpeded
Althoughthelifewasveryharsh,thedoctorremainedontheislandforthereasonofthepeople.
ThefactthatmostAmericansliveinurbanareasdoesnotmeanthattheyresideinthecenteroflargecities.Infact,moreAme
Theexaminerfailedsomecandidates,and15ofthembeingstudentswithoutworkexperience.
随机试题
艺术想象力
(2016年真题)下列关于《元典章》的表述,不正确的是()。
人身意外伤害停工保险均采用定额给付方式当被保险人发生停工损失时,保险人在责任期间内按保险金额每日或每周给付停工保险款,一般情况下,停工保险金为实际收入水平的()
甲公司向乙公司订购了一套生产设备,双方签订的买卖合同中对设备的型号、规格、质量等做了明确约定,但未约定质量检验期间。甲公司收到设备后,因故一直未使用,亦未支付剩余货款。收到货物两年后,甲公司才开始使用该设备,却发现该设备的质量与合同约定不符。当乙公司要求甲
根据合同法律制度的规定,下列各项中,不属于无效合同的是()。
收养关系的解除方法包括( )程序和诉讼解除程序。
在奴隶社会、封建社会中,警察的职能是由警察机构掌管的。( )
在计算机语言中有一种逻辑运算,如果两个数同一位上都是0时,其和为0;一个为0、一个为1时或两个都是1时,其和为1。那么( )。
Theeffectofthebabyboomontheschoolshelpedtomakepossibleashiftinthinkingabouttheroleofpubliceducationinthe
Whenwespeakofahumanneed,wemeansomethingwhichisunnecessarytolife,somethingwecanlivewith.【M1】
最新回复
(
0
)