首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
With the parliamentary elections behind us, we now have an unobstructed view of how one of the world’s most important political
With the parliamentary elections behind us, we now have an unobstructed view of how one of the world’s most important political
admin
2016-10-20
43
问题
With the parliamentary elections behind us, we now have an unobstructed view of how one of the world’s most important political stories will unfold. Prime Minister David Cameron, who shocked pollsters by winning an outright majority in elections on May 7, promised voters a referendum by the end of 2017 on whether Britain will remain a member of the European Union. Some observers say that it’s all smoke, that Britons surely won’t vote to exit the E. U. Maybe. But the possibility of an exit—and the fear, anxiety and opportunism it generates—make this a story the world dare not ignore.
Britain’s economy is among the strongest in Europe. Its GDP grew by 2. 6% last year, one of the best performances in the developed world. Employment stands at a record high. Yet Britain’s election results prove once again that the anti-E. U. populism now roiling European politics is alive and well in the U. K. Conservatives won their majority in part by promising a vote on E. U. membership that many party members don’t actually want. Labour, which carefully hedged its referendum bets, took a beating of surprising scale. The election’s biggest loser, the centrist Liberal Democrats, proved beyond a doubt that in this political climate, the middle of the road is the surest place to get hit by a truck.
The only pro-E. U. winner in Britain’s vote was the Scottish National Party (SNP) , which won 56 of Scotland’s 59 contested seats just months after leading a failed effort to win Scotland’s independence from the U. K. Another winner was the Euroskeptic right-wing U. K. Independence Party (UKIP). The party won just one seat in the House of Commons, but its 12.6% of the national vote was more than either the Liberal Democrats or SNP could muster. Beyond its seat or vote count, UKIP has changed British politics by giving voice to public frustration with the E. U. and pushing the referendum to center stage.
Now the referendum is coming. What’s at stake? In many ways, E. U. membership has served Britain well—particularly its supersize banking sector, which has helped make London into a global city. In 2014, financial and insurance services brought in $193.7 billion in gross value added (GVA) to the U. K. economy, totaling 8% of the U.K.’s GVA. It’s little surprise, then, that fear of a British exit—which could seriously upset the international banking industry—has persuaded some U. K. financial institutions to send up warnings. Some 72% of British companies polled by the firm Grant Thornton say an exit would hurt business. HSBC has warned that it would consider relocating its headquarters from London should the U. K. leave the E. U.
No wonder British firms are on edge. By some estimates, "Brexit" would cost the U.K. $330 billion, or 14% of its GDP. After leaving, Britain would have to renegotiate trade relationships with individual E.U. members, and its government would lose much of its international clout. London would also become a less important ally for the U. S. , which values Britain in part for its influence within the E. U. Finally, if polls suggest that a British exit is really possible, an empowered SNP might demand that overwhelmingly pro-E.U. Scots again get to vote on Scottish independence—and this time, they might well win.
Right now, British voters are roughly split on an E.U. exit. In a recent poll by the consultancy Populus, 39% said they want to leave, while about 40% said they want to stay. That leaves a lot of undecided voters, and much will happen over the next two years. Bets will be hedged and preparations made, in Britain and across Europe. That alone will be a story worth following.
It can be inferred from the passage that______.
选项
A、Britain’s election could mean an unruly exit from the E. U.
B、British voters are unevenly split on an E. U. exit
C、British exit would cost the E. U. 14% of its economy
D、Britain would renegotiate political links with individual E. U. members
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/5OcO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
LifeandtheWorldLifeandtheworld,orwhateverwecallthatwhichweareandfeel,isanastonishingthing.Themistoff
AGreatFriendshipThomasJeffersonandJamesMadisonmetin1776.Couldithavebeenanyotheryear?Theyworkedtogetherst
SigmundFreudIfthereisasinglenameinallpsychologythatissynonymouswithpersonalitytheory,itisSigmundFreud.Bo
WorldWaterShortageAnewstudywarnsthataboutthirtypercentoftheworld’speoplemaynothaveenoughwaterbytheyear
Menandwomenshouldlimittheiralcohol______tolessthanabottleandahalfofwinethreedaysaweektominimizehealthrisk
Thesecondlittlepigwasunlucky.Hebuilthishousefromsticks.Itwasblownawaybyahuffing,puffingwolf,whichpromptly
Banksare______toprotecttheircustomers’financialprivacyandatthesametimenotifytherelatedagenciesofcertainquestio
Theelectionof2017sawthemincreasingtheirnumberofparliamentaryseatsinScotlandfromoneto13andmadeimpressivegain
最近一项调查表明,接近16%的互联网用户对网络不同程度的上瘾,结果导致家庭生活受损。
随机试题
男,45岁。发作性头痛、心悸、大汗2年,发作时血压230/130mmHg,平素血压不高。对诊断最有帮助的是发作时测定尿
随着年龄的增长,老年人大脑的明显改变是
某企业2014年年度利润总额80万元,通过公益性社会团体向某灾区捐赠2万元,直接向某学校捐款5万元。根据企业所得税法律制度的规定,该企业在计算企业所得税应纳税所得额时,可以扣除捐赠支出()万元。
你的一个朋友向你借了一万元钱,你是否让他打借条,为什么?如果这种情况反过来,你会怎么做?
孔子是人不是神。把孔子推上神坛的是后人,并非孔子的过错。在2500年前孔子的思想和成就能达到那样的高度,确实了不起,我们应该充分肯定和尊重,其中今天仍有价值的部分应该很好地珍惜利用。把孔子和儒家学说说得一文不值,是极端和片面的。把孔子作为神来膜拜,把儒学作
独立自主、完全平等、互相尊重、互不干涉内部事务四项原则只是中国共产党处理与世界其他工人阶级政党的原则。()
有如下类和对象的定义:classConstants{public:staticdoublegetPI(){return3.1416;}};Constantsconstants;下列各组语句中,能输出3.1416的是(
在打印数据表过程中,某一列或某几列内的数据不需要将其进行打印,但又不能删除,可以对其进行()。
Ifwomenareencouragedbyequalpaytotakefull-timejobs,theywillbeunabletodothethingstheyarebestatdoing:making
Shoppinghasalwaysbeensomethingofanimpulseactivity,inwhichobjectsthatcatchourfancywhilestrollingareimmediately
最新回复
(
0
)