首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In politics, in the courts, even on the ubiquitous TV talkshow, it is good form to pick an intellectual fight. People attack eac
In politics, in the courts, even on the ubiquitous TV talkshow, it is good form to pick an intellectual fight. People attack eac
admin
2011-01-10
134
问题
In politics, in the courts, even on the ubiquitous TV talkshow, it is good form to pick an intellectual fight. People attack each other- hurl insults, even- and it counts as logical argument. I cannot understand it.
It seems that our society favours a kind of ritualized aggression. Everywhere you look, in newspapers and on television, issues are presented using the terminology of war and conflict. We hear of battles, duels and disputes. We see things in terms of winners and losers, victors and victims.
The problem is society’s unquestioning belief in the advantages of the debate as a way of solving disagreements, even proving right from wrong. Our brainwashing begins early at school, when the brightest pupils are co-opted onto the debating system. They get there because they can think up a good argument to support their case. Once on the debate team, they learn that they earn bonus points for the skill with which they verbally attack, or insult, the opposing team. They win if they can successfully convince the audience that they are right, even if the case they are arguing is clearly nonsensual. They do this by proving themselves to be stronger, brighter, more outrageous, even.
The training in this adversarial approach continues at our tertiary institutions. The standard way to present an academic paper, for instance, is to take up an opposing argument to something expressed by another academic. The paper must set out to prove the other person wrong. This is not at all the same thing as reading the original paper with an open mind and discovering that you disagree with it.
The reverence for the adversarial approach spills over into all areas of life. Instead of answering their critics, politicians learn to sidestep negative comments and turn the point around to an attack on accusers. Defense lawyers argue the case for their clients even when they suspect they may be guilty. And ordinary people use the same tactics—just listen to your teenager next time you pull him up for coming home late. You can be sure a stream of abuse will flow about your own time—keeping, your irritating habits, your history of bad parenting.
Unfortunately, the smarter your kid, the better his or her argument against you will be. You’ll be upset, but you’ll comfort yourself that those teenage monsters of yours will one day turn into mature, though adults who can look after themselves—by which you mean, of course, they will be able to argue their way out of sticky situations.
It’s not that you should never use angry words, or take up a position in opposition to someone or something. There are certainly times when one should take a stand, and in such cases strong words are quite appropriate: if you witness injustice, for instance, or feel passionately about another’s folly. Mockery—so cruel when practised on the innocent—can be very useful in such situations. There is no better way to bring down a tyrant than to mock him mercilessly.
What I dislike is the automatic assumption most people have when it comes to disagreements: they should attack, abuse, preferably overpower their opponent, at whatever the cost. The approach is so ingrained that "compromise" has become a dirty word. We feel guilty if we are conciliatory rather than confrontational. We have trained ourselves, or been brainwashed into believing, that to be pleasant is a sign of weakness.
But just think how easy it can be to persuade a "difficult" person to be considerate of you or your wished when you are pleasant to them, and unthreatening. Give them a way out of a potentially aggressive situation without losing face, and they will oblige you willingly.
Discuss a subject without taking an adversarial position and you will find the other person happy to explore the possibilities with you. I’m prepared to bet on it. You’ll get closer to the truth of the matter than you would by going to each other hammer and tongs.
At the end of the passage "going at each other hammer and tongs" means______.
选项
A、attacking or abusing stealthily
B、mocking or scoffing with tongs
C、compromising or consulting with a hammer
D、quarrelling or fighting noisily
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/5TcO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Ofalltheareasoflearningthemostimportantisthedevelopmentofattitudes.Emotionalreactionsaswellaslogicalthought
Healwaysincludedsomethingabovetheunderstandingofhishearersinordertopreventthemfrombecoming______andtostimulate
Theamazingsuccessofhumansasa【C1】______istheresultoftheevolutionarydevelopmentofourbrainswhichhasled,amongoth
Thefieldofmedicinehasalwaysattracteditsshareofquacksandcharlatans—disreputablewomenandmenwithlittleornomed
Networktelevision,magazine,anddirectmail—thatwillbethebiggainersinadvertisingrevenuesnextyear.
InterpersonalRelationshipsInthelast25yearswehavewitnessedanimpressivegrowthinourknowledgeaboutemotionsande
InterpersonalRelationshipsInthelast25yearswehavewitnessedanimpressivegrowthinourknowledgeaboutemotionsande
纽约市是美国最大的城市,约有1100万的人口居住在纽约市及其郊区。纽约市主要分布在哈得逊河入海口的三个岛屿上。纽约市中心及许多著名景观都坐落于曼哈顿岛。一些世界最著名的摩天大楼矗立在纽约市的大街上。第五大街是著名的商业街,而百老汇则因剧院而闻名。或许纽约市
每次的医学突破总会伴随着负面影响,譬如说避孕药丸,它产生于20世纪60年代,现在已经不算什么新闻了。它使妇女能够更多地控制自己的身体,也有利于控制人口增长。但它也导致人们开始对性别角色、性、自由和家庭的观念产生怀疑。它给全世界带来巨大的社会变化。这是好事吗
在世界上,每年都会有约16万名15岁以下儿童被发现患有癌症。研究者发现这些病例中有84%发生在发展中国家。他们说在这些国家里只有10%的患癌症儿童能够存活。如果这些国家拥有必要的资源来发现和治疗癌症,更多的儿童能被救活。在英国和美国这样的工业国家里,患癌症
随机试题
正常小儿后囟闭合的年龄是
阴虚型产后汗证,宜选用的最佳方剂为
患者,女性,42岁,右上腹疼痛2天,伴有寒战,T38.8℃,近一天发现巩膜发黄,相继出现皮肤黄染。提示可能发生的疾病是()
《“十三五”交通扶贫规划》明确,力争到2020年,总体实现“进得来、出得去、行得通、走得畅”的交通扶贫目标。下列有关举措正确的有()。
下列关于债权转让中债权人通知义务的论述中,哪一项是正确的?()
虚拟企业是当市场出现新机遇时,具有不同资源与优势的企业为了共同开拓市场,共同对付其他的竞争者而组织的、建立在信息网络基础上的共享技术与信息、分担费用、联合开发的、互利的企业联盟体。根据上述定义,下列属于虚拟企业的是:
He’s______hischildrentomycareforaday.
实际利率和名义利率都可能为负值。()[中央财经大学2012金融硕士]
Whentheyaskedhimaboutit,hesaiditwasno______oftheirsandwouldn’ttellthemanything.
HowtoDuckCabinFeversAndOtherAchesonaPlane?[A]Onthefirstlegofthisseason’sholidaytraveltour,Ihadthedelight
最新回复
(
0
)