首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
What if the government simply paid everyone enough so that no one was poor? That’s the so called "universal basic income" or UBI
What if the government simply paid everyone enough so that no one was poor? That’s the so called "universal basic income" or UBI
admin
2021-08-06
87
问题
What if the government simply paid everyone enough so that no one was poor? That’s the so called "universal basic income" or UBI. It’s an insane idea that’s gaining an unlikely alliance of supporters. The follow excerpt provides details of this idea.
Write an article of NO LESS THAN 300 words, in which you should:
1. summarize the basic idea of UBI and its justification, and then
2. express your opinion towards it, especially whether it is practical in the near future.
A Universal Basic Income Is the Solution to Poverty
There’s a simple way to end poverty: the government just gives everyone enough money, so nobody is poor. No ifs, buts, conditions, or tests. Everyone gets the minimum they need to survive, even if they already have plenty.
This, in essence, is "universal basic income " or "guaranteed basic income"—where, instead of multiple income assistance programs, we have just one: a single payment to all citizens, regardless of background, gender, or race. It’s a policy idea that sounds crazy at first, but actually begins to make sense when you consider some recent trends.
The first is that work isn’t what it used to be. Many people now struggle through a 50-hour week and still don’t have enough to live on. There are many reasons for this—including the heartlessness of employers and the weakness of unions—but it’s a fact. Work no longer pays. The wages of most American workers have stagnated or declined since the 1970s.
The second: it’s likely to get worse. Robots already do many menial tasks. In the future, they’ll do more sophisticated jobs as well. A study from Oxford University found that 47% of jobs are at risk of computerization over the next two decades. We’re approaching an era when there will simply be less to do.
The third is that traditional welfare is both not what it used to be and not very efficient. The value of welfare for families with children is now well below what it was in the 1990s, for example.
For these reasons and others, the idea of a basic income for everyone is becoming increasingly popular. The exact details of basic income still need to be worked out, but it might work something like this: Instead of welfare payments, subsidies for health care, and tax credits for the working poor, we would take that money and use it to cover a single payment that would give someone the chance to live reasonably.
A pilot in the 1970s in Manitoba, Canada, showed that a "Mincome" not only ended poverty but also reduced hospital visits and raised high-school completion rates. There seemed to be a community-affirming effect, which showed itself in people making use of free public services more responsibly.
Meanwhile, there were eight "negative income tax" trials in the U.S. in the ’70s, where people received payments and the government clawed back most of it in taxes based on your other income. The results for those trials were more mixed. They reduced poverty, but people also worked slightly less than normal. To some, this is the major drawback of basic income: it could make people lazier than they would otherwise be. That would certainly be a problem, though it’s questionable whether, in the future, there will be as much employment anyway. The age of robots and artificial intelligence seems likely to hollow out many jobs, perhaps changing how we view notions of laziness and productivity altogether.
选项
答案
Universal Basic Income Is Unrealistic As our society further progresses in creating wealth, the issue of poverty becomes more prominent and the elimination of it is more urgent. In order to end poverty, the idea of universal basic income is put forward which proposes that everyone gets the minimum they need to live regardless of what he or she already has, with considerations of the decline of salary, the computerization of work and the inefficiency of traditional welfare system. Despite the fact that policy derived from this idea has achieved quite promising results in pilot towns in Canada and America, I still believe that universal basic income is unrealistic. It is bound to fail if universally applied. First and obviously, the idea of universal basic income breaks the conventional balance between work and pay. If people reap without sowing, then there would be such individuals who would rather stroll around than work or do anything substantial for the good of society. The reason is as plain as day. Working or not, all people can anyway receive the minimal income sufficient to support their living. As a result, laziness will spread like virus among people who see through the "benefit" of not working. Another argument in favor of my view is that once idleness is regarded as a comfortable way of living, then the production of the whole society will without doubt slow down. I do not deny the computerization of much work, yet neither do I deny that robots and computers have to be controlled and operated by men. Therefore, laziness among the general public will, in one way or another, decrease the overall productivity of the world. And we should bear in mind that without sustainable sources of income it is a mission impossible to guarantee universal basic income to everyone. In a word, I contend that it is unrealistic to enforce universal basic income since it violates the rule of gaining pay through work. In fact, the implementation of universal basic income, instead of eradicating poverty, may put more people at the risk of it.
解析
材料探讨了“无条件基本收入”这一话题,大致可分为两部分内容,包括提出这一想法的原因和它在试点产生的结果。
前六段中,作者陈述无条件基本收入政策得到支持的三方面的理由。一是现在工资太低不足以维持生活(Work no longer pays.);二是大部分工作很可能会变成计算机化(at risk of computerization),结果是可做的工作越来越少;三是传统的福利政策也大不如前。因此,无条件基本收入政策有其合理性和必要性。
最后两段则以加拿大和美国为例,介绍该政策试行后的结果。加拿大的一个试点(pilot)说明无条件基本收入不仅能消除贫困(ended poverty),而且能减少就医人数和提高高中结业率(high-school completion rates)。而美国的例子则体现了让人喜忧参半(more mixed)的结果:一方面减少了贫穷(reduced poverty),但另一方面人们却更懒了(make people lazier)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/9DIK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
IngmaBergman’slatestworkasascreenwriteris"Sunday’sChildren".SetinruralSwedenduringthelate1920s,thestorycen
"Almostuniversally,womenhavefailedtoreachleadingpositionsinmajorcorporationsandprivatesectororganizations,resp
(1)Afteralongdayattheoffice,manyofusfindourselvestakingoutourstressonfriends,children,orsignificantothers.
还是成都的那些旧街道,我跟着你一步一步地走过平坦的石板路,我望着你的背影,心里安慰地想:父亲还很康健呢。一种幸福的感觉使我的全身发热了。我那时不会知道我是在梦中,也忘记了二十五年来的艰苦日子。在戏园里,我坐在你旁边,看台上的武戏,你还详细地给我解
冬天,在四周围都是山地的这里,看见太阳的日子真是太少了。今天,难得雾是这么稀薄,空中融融地混合着金黄的阳光,把地上的一切,好像也罩上一层欢笑的颜色。我走出了这黝黯的小阁,这个作为我们办公的地方(它整年关住我!),我扬着脖子,张开了我的双臂,恨不得
晚上的夜游活动堪称压轴节目。夜幕降临,乐山上空礼炮轰鸣,彩灯光芒四溢。河面各只彩船上无数五颜六色的霓虹灯、日光灯齐放光华,闪烁迷离,和水中倒影连成一片。漂灯点缀河面,似万点繁星坠落人间。在奇光异彩交相辉映中众多的龙舟如银河流星,顺河而下,千姿百态,令人叫绝
老师很喜欢这个嘴甜的小姑娘。
LaoTzu,thegreatancientChinesethinker,onceobservedinhiswell-knownwork,theTaoTeChing,"Hewhoknowsothersisinte
Theworldseemsincreasinglydividedintothosewhofavorgeneticallymodified(GM)foodsandthosewhofearthem.Advocatesass
关于中国的知识产权,大家都很关心,我们也很关心。坦率地说,中国保护知识产权,绝不是因为有什么压力,也不是做给什么人看的,而是自身发展的需要。中国保护知识产权的决心是一贯和坚定的,我们很清醒,如果没有一个保护知识产权的法制环境,中国100年也发展不起来。过去
随机试题
电子节气门技术采用_______来驱动节气门的开闭。
团队强调__________、在合作中达成共识。
对造血起主要负调控作用的是
患者男,55岁,支气管扩张20年,近年来手指末端增生、肥厚,指甲从根部到末端拱形隆起呈杵状。该患者出现这种变化的主要原因是()。
工程设计以()为依据,一般分为扩大初步设计和施工图设计。
沉井主要是靠井壁的( )来克服( )而下沉的。
我国证券投资分析师执业的“十六字”原则是:遵纪守法、公正公平、准确清晰、勤勉尽职。( )
党的十六大报告中指出教育是发展科学技术和培养人才的基础,在现代化建设中具有()的作用。
建立社会保障制度的主要目的是为了更好地体现公平原则。但公平与效率之间存在矛盾,公平只能是相对的,特别是对我国这样一个发展中国家来说,经济发展水平还比较低,发展生产力、提高效率应放在第一位;只有生产力和生产效率提高了,才能更好地实现社会公平。这段话主要支持的
以下关于工作包的描述,正确的是(30)。
最新回复
(
0
)