首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The University in transformation, edited by Australian futurists Sohail Inayatullah and Jennifer Gidley, presents some 20 highly
The University in transformation, edited by Australian futurists Sohail Inayatullah and Jennifer Gidley, presents some 20 highly
admin
2011-01-10
34
问题
The University in transformation, edited by Australian futurists Sohail Inayatullah and Jennifer Gidley, presents some 20 highly varied outlooks on tomorrow’s universities by writers representing both Western and non-Western perspectives. Their essays raise a broad range of issues, questioning nearly every key assumption we have about higher education today.
The most widely discussed alternative to the traditional campus is the Internet University— a voluntary community to scholars/teachers physically scattered throughout a country or around the world but all linked in cyberspace. A computerized university could have many advantages, such as easy scheduling, efficient delivery of lectures to thousands or even millions of students at once, and ready access for students everywhere to the resources of all the world’s great libraries.
Yet the Internet University poses dangers, too. For example, a line of franchised courseware, produced by a few superstar teachers, marketed under the brand name of a famous institution, and heavily advertised, might eventually come to dominate the global education market, warns sociology professor Peter Manicas of the University of Hawaii at Manoa. Besides enforcing a rigidly standardized curriculum, such a "college education in a box" could undersell the offerings of many traditional brick and mortar institutions, effectively driving them out of business and throwing thousands of career academics out of work, note Australian communications professors David Rooney and Greg Hearn.
On the other hand, while global connectivity seems highly likely to play some significant role in future higher education, that does not mean greater uniformity in course content—or other dangers—will necessarily follow. Counter-movements are also at work.
Many in academia, including scholars contributing to this volume, are questioning the fundamental mission of university education. What if, for instance, instead of receiving primarily technical training and building theft individual careers, university students and professors could focus their learning and research efforts on existing problems in their local communities and the world? Feminist scholar Ivana Milojevic dares to dream what a university might become "if we believed that child-care workers and teachers in early childhood education should be one of the highest (rather than lowest) paid professionals?"
Co-editor Jennifer Gidley shows how tomorrow’s university faculty, instead of giving lectures and conducting independent research, may take on three new roles. Some would act as brokers, assembling customized degree-credit programmes for individual students by mixing and matching the best course offerings available from institutions all around the world. A second group, mentors, would function much like today’s faculty advisers, but are likely to be working with many more students outside their own academic specialty. This would require them to constantly be learning from their students as well as instructing them.
A third new role for faculty, and in Gidley’s view the most challenging and rewarding of all, would be as meaning-makers: charismatic sages and practitioners leading groups of students/colleagues in collaborative efforts to find spiritual as well as rational and technological solutions to specific real-world problems.
Moreover, there seems little reason to suppose that any one form of university must necessarily drive out all other options. Students may be "enrolled" in courses offered at virtual campuses on the Internet, between—or even during—sessions at a real-world problem-focused institution.
As co-editor Sohail Inayatullah points out in his introduction, no future is inevitable, and the very act of imagining and thinking through alternative possibilities can directly affect how thoughtfully, creatively and urgently even a dominant technology is adapted and applied. Even in academia, the future belongs to those who care enough to work their visions into practical, sustainable realities.
Judging from the "three new roles" (para. 6) envisioned for tomorrow’s university faculty, university teachers ______.
选项
A、are required to conduct more independent research
B、are required to offer more course to their students
C、are supposed to assume more demanding duties
D、are supposed to supervise more students in their specialty
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/9ncO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Wheninsectsfeedondecayingplantmaterialinacompostpile,theyhelpturnitintousefulgardensoil.
Hotelsandrestaurantsarean______partofthecity,withoutwhichthetouristindustrycouldnotexist.
Humanbeingsaresuperiortoanimalsthattheycanuselanguageasatoolofcommunication.
TheaffluentmiddleclasscreatedbytheAsianboomnowtakeupoverfromexportsasthemainengineofgrowth.
AlphaZeroseemstoexpressinsight.Itplayslikenocomputereverhas,intuitivelyandbeautifully,witharomantic,attacking
1986年全国人大常委会副委员长班禅喇嘛在西康地区大法会上教诲信徒们,要爱惜民族团结,维护祖国统一。在中国,公民的信仰自由受到法律保护。目前全西藏在寺僧尼约有14,000多人,另有800位宗教界人士在各级人大、政协、佛教协会和政府部门中工作。
主席先生,女士们、先生们:目前,国际形势正处于深刻变化之中。和平与发展仍然是当今时代的主题,总体和平的国际环境为世界经济发展提供了有利条件;科技进步日新月异并孕育着新的重大突破,前所未有地提高了人类认识、把握宏观和微观世界的能力,展现了新的发展
下面你将听到的是一段有关旅游的讲话。旅游是一项集观光、娱乐、健身为一体的愉快而美好的活动。旅游业随着时代进步而不断进步。从20世纪中期起,现代旅游业在全世界迅速发展。游客人数不断增长,旅游业规模持续扩大,旅游经济地位显著提升,旅游活动愈
下面你将听到的是一段有关文化方面的讲话。Whatweneedisa"CultureofTolerance",awaytoreconciletheneedforidentitywithanopenandou
A、Ten.B、Atleasttwelve.C、Two.D、Notmentioned.A
随机试题
辨证为首选何方治疗
犬,车祸后意识清醒,头颈不能抬起,四肢麻痹呈瘫痪状态,其受伤部位可能在
长期应用可能升高血钾的药物是
子宫内膜癌Ⅱ期患者,首选的治疗措施应是
α链β链
世界上第一部审计准则是()。
甲公司为外商投资企业,以人民币为记账本位币,采用交易发生日的即期汇率折算外币业务。甲公司按季度计算应予资本化的借款费用金额(每年按照360天计算,每月按照30天计算)。(1)20×4年1月1日为建造一处厂房,向银行借入5年期外币借款2700万美元,年利率
甲:各国的国情和传统不同,但是对于谋杀和其他严重刑事犯罪实施死刑,至少是大多数人可以接受的。公开宣判和执行死刑可以有效地阻止恶性刑事案件的发生,它所带来的正面影响比可能存在的负面影响肯定大得多,这是社会自我保护的一种必要机制。乙:我不能接受你的见解。因为在
Icouldn’tstopcrying.Monthsoflateeveningsanddemandingtravelhad【C1】______myprofessionalexterior.Itriedto【C2】______
人们用它来辟邪。
最新回复
(
0
)