首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Help to Buy should be dubbed Help to Vote. George Osborne today promised his party to deliver half a million "hard-working" elec
Help to Buy should be dubbed Help to Vote. George Osborne today promised his party to deliver half a million "hard-working" elec
admin
2015-01-10
27
问题
Help to Buy should be dubbed Help to Vote. George Osborne today promised his party to deliver half a million "hard-working" electors from the dungeons of housing debt to the sunny uplands of Help to Buy. He would shower them with £l2 billion of other people’s money. He could summon the spirits of Toryism past, but will they come? With house prices heading back to their 2009 peak, throwing subsidies at the soft underbelly of housing demand looks crazy. The IMF, the Commons Treasury committee, and every economic commentator thinks the policy is mad. Business investment is still a third below its pre-recession level. Why spend billions on the sector that seems not to need it?
To be fair to Osborne, he dreamed up this scheme two years ago in a search to "kick-start" demand. House-building is an economic talisman that had all but stalled. The first round of Help to Buy last year appeared to work, with new building up by 10%. Nor is there a sign of a house price surge outside the south-east. This year’s rise is 3. 3%, and that is driven partly by a tidal wave of foreign funk money pouring into inner London.
Osborne’s officials are also doing their best to discipline the offer. The subsidized 15% deposit on a mortgage is relatively expensive, and is just for seven years. Banks are being told to subject applicants to tough means and credit tests. For an average house, the scheme is unlikely to be affordable to those with incomes below £30,000 a year.
The Treasury is also charging banks a fee to administer the loans, making it a relatively safe deal for the taxpayer. In other words, this is no Fannie Mae. It is not about dousing the incautious poor with houses, rather helping our old friends the middling rich. Of the half million people whose dreams David Cameron promises to "make come true", Savills estate agency group reckons a third will be existing home-owners trading up. In other words, if Osborne must stand on the street corner handing money to people, I would certainly rather it went to a few hard-pressed households ready to channel it into the real economy, and it went to them than to the other favourite recipients of his billions.
For all that, the Help to Buy scheme vividly demonstrates the madcap world of British housing finance. The privately owned home has sat at the heart of political argument since the days of Margaret Thatcher. She considered home ownership a right. "Getting on the ladder" was a ritual of growing up. Rent, paid by most Europeans for somewhere to live, was "money down the drain". Thatcher subsidized ownership to the hilt with mortgage tax relief, ignoring the fact that most mortgage-holders were in effect renting their homes from building societies. The accrued value usually lay inert until retirement, or until it passed to lucky offspring. Housing subsidies are either pension subsidies or a colossal child benefit for the next generation rich.
Britons have come to expect politicians to help them step on to the ladder in their late 20s and early 30s. Germans, French and Japanese wait into their 40s, letting their savings fructify in the industrial economy. This is reflected in the figures. Home ownership comprises 43% of households in Germany and 70% in Britain. Just 17% of Britons rent privately, against 48% of Germans. This is some "Englishman’s castle", merely the direct result of half a century of political bribery.
As the economist Adam Posen has pointed out: subsidizing home ownership is not just "a bias towards inflation and housing bubbles", it leaves less money to help those in real housing need. It distorts the nation’s capital accumulation towards bricks and mortar. It increases the divide between house inheritors and the poor. Because home ownership is the icon of the centre ground, Labour panders to it as much as the Tories. Thus the recession began with a house price bubble that hit overcrowded Britain as it did under-crowded America. It was nothing like as bad in overcrowded Germany or Japan. In each case what drove the bubble, or restrained it, was not supply, but reckless lending.
Likewise the much-quoted figure of 250,000 extra houses "needed" in England each year is taken as implying that they must be built afresh. But new-build will be a pin-prick against the awesome stock of existing properties, and those empty and under-used. Any voyage through post-industrial Britain is one of despair at the failure of housing and planning policies to use land efficiently, to regenerate cities and infill suburbs.
The coalition has made some strides. It is right to make it easier to change buildings to residential use, and allow a degree of "garden grabbing". For the first time a government has tried to tackle the misallocation and under-occupancy of social housing, albeit hamfistedly with a bedroom "tax". Housing subsidies should go to the poor. Labour did nothing on this score. The truth is that Britain’s housing finance is a mess. Housing is like crime, a realm of policy that is gripped not by reason but by political psychology. Osborne may indeed summon his spirits from the dungeons, but will they come?
Which of the following does NOT support the author’s conclusion "Britain’s housing finance is a mess"(para. 9)?
选项
A、Subsidizing home ownership leads to inflation and housing bubbles.
B、It distorts the nation’s capital accumulation towards the building of houses.
C、It leaves less money to help those in real housing need.
D、Home ownership has established itself as the centre ground in national economy.
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/CxSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
TheauthorofthebookOntheHumanAnimalwasnotatalldubiousofthedisastrousfutureofhuman’slifeinthatrespect.
OfalltheemployedworkersintheUnitedStates,12.5millionarepartofatemporaryworkforce.TheUnitedStatesBureauofLa
Itiswellknownthatteenageboystendtodobetter【C1】________maththangirls,thatmalehighschoolstudentsaremorelikely
Expressionismisanartisticstyleinwhichtheartistseekstodepictnotobjectiverealitybutratherthesubjectiveemotions
OxfordandCambridgeUniversityBoatClubshavebothtakentheopportunitytotraveltoSpainthismonthtotraininlesstestin
当年为了实现乌拉圭回合,各个成员费了很大劲儿,但事后的结果并不乐观,世界经济更不平衡,两极分化越加严重。面对这一现象,发展中国家不能容忍,发达国家也感到了危机。正因为如此,大家才把多哈回合定为发展回合。这是WTO历史上巨大的进步,也是各个成员富有远见的选择
StevenAveryfaceslifeimprisonforarapeofayoungwoman18yearsago.
StevenAveryfaceslifeimprisonforarapeofayoungwoman18yearsago.
JohnCiardigothismaster’sdegreefromtheUniversityofMichiganin1939andhaspublishedmorethan40poems.
LosAngelescabinet-makerEdwardStewartmaybeamodernDr.Frankenstein.In1959,heclaims,herestoredadeadfriendtolife
随机试题
Saphire出版公司由Jimmysan一手创建,他至今仍拥有这家公司。自其创立之初至今的30年间,该公司已经发生了很大变化。Jimmysan没有接受过任何的商业培训,所以他一直是凭直觉经营,他所做的一切决策都是以他认为能取得最大盈利为基础。他出版日历
A.毒血症B.菌血症C.菌群失调症D.脓毒血症E.败血症病原菌侵入血流,但不大量繁殖,可引起
A.单侧听力下降B.颅骨内板腐蚀破坏C.双颞侧视野缺损D.桥脑小脑角综合征E.多饮、多尿及鞍上钙化
抗风湿药物中对消化道损害强的药物首推
患者,男性,48岁,右下第一磨牙缺失3个月,余留牙健康,拟固定义齿修复。如果牙根较短,支持力不足,固定桥修复时应采取的措施是
廉泉、照海同用,具有什么作用
钢筋混凝土构件的模板拆除顺序一般是()。
在运输结构分析中,各种运输方式的营运线路长度、运输工具数量和客货运输量的地区分布,属于()范畴。[2008年真题]
简述认知学习理论的主要观点。
在结构化方法中,用数据流程图(DFD)作为描述工具的软件开发阶段是______。
最新回复
(
0
)