首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Just giving out cash to poor people is a pretty good way to make them less poor. That might seem obvious, but it wasn’t a common
Just giving out cash to poor people is a pretty good way to make them less poor. That might seem obvious, but it wasn’t a common
admin
2020-08-17
27
问题
Just giving out cash to poor people is a pretty good way to make them less poor. That might seem obvious, but it wasn’t a commonly held viewpoint in development charities until relatively recently. Jacquelline Fuller, who runs Google’s philanthropic arm, has said that when she first pitched one of her bosses on supporting GiveDirectly (a charity doing unrestricted cash transfers), he replied, "You must be smoking crack. "
But in part due to groups like GiveDirectly, and in even larger part due to the success of government programs like Brazil’s Bolsa Familia and Kenya’s cash program for orphans and vulnerable children, that stigma has dissipated. Cash is cool now, at least in some corners.
And for good reason. The most common arguments against giving out cash—that it’s wasted on drugs and alcohol, or makes recipients stop working—have been debunked in repeated studies, and a review of hundreds of studies measuring dozens of different outcomes suggests that cash programs can increase food consumption, boost school attendance, and improve nutrition. If nothing else, cash just mechanically makes people less poor. It’s not a cure-all and has real limitations, but it’s pretty good, and "pretty good" can be hard to find in international development.
One advantage of having a pretty good rough-and-ready way to help poor people abroad is that it gives you something to test against. This is called
"cash benchmarking",
and it’s something that cash fans, like GiveDirectly’s co-founder Paul Niehaus, have promoted for years. The idea is that because cash works reasonably well, respects the independence of recipients, and is relatively easy to hand out at minimal administrative expense, aid agencies should test programs to see if they meet their objectives better than cash would. If they don’t, that’s a pretty good argument to either improve the program or switch to cash.
USAID, the American foreign aid agency, made news in October by testing a nutrition program a-gainst cash. The two performed about equally well, with maybe a slight advantage to the cost-equivalent cash program; a much bigger cash program had really outstanding impacts.
But as a number of development professionals pointed out after I profiled the USAID program, that’s not the full story. At least two other studies have compared complex non-cash aid programs to cash—and beat cash.
Both studies invoke programs commonly known in the development word as " ultra-poor graduation" programs, as they’re meant to
"graduate"
beneficiaries out of extreme poverty.
Graduation programs try to target the very poorest people in already very poor countries. Instead of only giving cash, they give valuable assets (which could be money but could also be an animal like a goat or cow, or equipment like a bicycle or sewing machine) as well as training, mentoring, and ongoing support (and sometimes some cash too, to buy food and keep people going). The hope is that giving some start-up capital and some business skills helps recipients build a small ongoing enterprise-—a small vegetable or dairy farming operation, say, or a bicycle messenger service, or a seamstress shop. That, in turn, is meant to enable a durable escape from poverty.
But recent research has suggested the graduation approach is promising. A massive randomized study published in 2015 by a murderer’s row of prominent development economists—including Northwestern’s Dean Karlan and MT’s Abhijit Banerjee and Esther Duflo, among others—found that a graduation program tested in Ethiopia, Ghana, Honduras, India, Pakistan, and Peru significantly increased income and savings, reduced hunger and missed meal, and improved mental health, on average. It worked in every country but Honduras, where people fell behind when the chickens they were given died of disease.
The word "graduate" in Paragraph 8 means________.
选项
A、finishing school education
B、receiving sufficient education to get rid of poverty
C、getting out of poverty
D、finishing the education they have received from their programs
答案
C
解析
词义理解题。graduate 自于“ultra-poor graduation” programs。第九段是对graduation programs的解释说明。由第九段最后一句可知,graduation programs的最终目的是让贫穷者持久摆脱贫困。由此可知,graduate在这里应该表示摆脱贫困的意思,C项符合文意,故为答案。graduate本身是“毕业”的意思,但本文没有谈及教育问题,故排除其他三项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/HNra777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
()isalanguagephenomenonwhichreferstoitsmostdirectandspecificmeaningofawordoranexpression.
长臂管辖(权)(long-armjurisdiction)是美国法院在民事诉讼中确定对案件是否拥有管辖权的一项规则。在1945年的国际鞋业公司诉华盛顿州案中,美国联邦最高法院以“最低限度联系”理论为基础,创立了特殊属人管辖权(specificjuris
______mechanicaldevicehaseverbeeninventedthatcansatisfactorilyreplaceteaselflowerheadsforraisingthenaponcloth
Workersinthiscountryaregettinghigherwageswhileturningoutpoorproductsthatdonot______thetestofinternationalco
It’snothingnewthatEnglishuseisontherisearoundtheworld,especiallyinbusinesscircles.ThisalsohappensinFrance,
Despitetheirnames,satinandsomanareexceptionallyuglysisters.Theyareorganophosphorousnervegases.Theyarecheapand
Whenthetelevisionisgood,nothing—notthetheater,notthemagazines,ornewspapers—nothingisbetter.Butwhentelevisioni
DiscussionoftheassimilationofPuertoRicansintheUnitedStateshasfocusedontwofactors:socialstandingandthelossof
DiscussionoftheassimilationofPuertoRicansintheUnitedStateshasfocusedontwofactors:socialstandingandthelossof
________wooden,buildingshelpstoprotectthemfromdamageduetoweather.
随机试题
在我国法定计量单位中,温度测量采用热力学温度,物理符号为T,单位采用开(尔文),符号()。
A.everythingiswrongB.DoyouagreeC.let’stotalthescoreD.let’sdoitE.wecandoitF.HereistheanswersheetG.He
下列不属于妇科外治法的是
上述四笔业务所涉及的下列账户中,不必设置明细分类账户的是( )。根据上述资料,计算出该企业的下列财务比率,其中正确的有( )。
下列各交易或事项,属于A公司的或有事项的有()。
()是行政管理学的核心问题,也是行政管理的出发点和归宿。
资本主义政治制度是在资本主义经济基础之上建立的,它反映了资本主义社会的经济关系,资本主义国家本质上是
在全概率公式P(B)=P(Ai)P(B|Ai)中,除了要求条件B是任意随机事件及P(AI)>0(i=1,2,…,n)之外,我们可以将其他条件改为
A、It’sMay5.B、It’safinedaytoday.C、It’sMay.D、It’sMonday.D“Whatdayisittoday?”即“今天星期几?”。D选项“It’sMonday.”(今天星期一。)是
Cancer____________(仅次于心脏病)asacauseofdeath.
最新回复
(
0
)