首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Since the end of World War II, a broad consensus in support of global economic integration as a force for peace and prosperity h
Since the end of World War II, a broad consensus in support of global economic integration as a force for peace and prosperity h
admin
2017-12-31
40
问题
Since the end of World War II, a broad consensus in support of global economic integration as a force for peace and prosperity has been a pillar of the international order. From global trade agreements to the European Union project: from the work of the Bretton Woods institutions to the removal of pervasive capital controls: from the vast expansion in foreign direct investment to major increases in the flow of people across borders, the overall direction has been clear. Driven by domestic economic progress, by technologies such as containerized shipping and the Internet that promote integration, and by legislative changes within countries and international agreements between countries, the world has gotten smaller and more closely connected.
This broad program of global integration has been more successful than could have been hoped. We have not had a war between major powers. Global standards of living have risen faster than at any point in history. And material progress has coincided with even more rapid progress in combating hunger, empowering women, promoting literacy and extending life. A world that will have more smart phones than adults within a few years is a world in which more is possible for more people than ever before.
Yet a revolt against global integration is underway in the West. The four candidates for president of the United States all oppose the principal free-trade initiative of this period: the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Trump’s proposals to wall off Mexico, abrogate trade agreements and persecute Muslims are far more popular than he is. The Brexit movement in Britain commands substantial support and could prevail. Whenever any aspect of the E. U. project is submitted to a popular referendum, it fails. Under pressure from a large influx of refugees, the European commitment to open borders appears to be crumbling. In large part because of political constraints, the growth of the international financial institutions has not kept pace with the growth of the global economy.
One substantial part of what is behind the resistance is a lack of knowledge. Everyone who loses a job because a factory moves abroad knows it: many who lose their jobs for local reasons blame globalization. But no one thanks international trade for the fact that their paycheck buys twice as much in clothes, toys and other goods as it otherwise would. Those who succeed as exporters tend to credit their own prowess, not international agreements. So there is certainly a case for our leaders and business communities to educate people about the benefits of global integration. But at this late date, with the trends moving the wrong way, it is hard to be optimistic about such efforts.
The core of the revolt against global integration, though, is not ignorance. It is a sense— unfortunately not wholly unwarranted—that it is a project being carried out by elites for elites. They see the globalization agenda as being set by large companies that successfully play one country against another. They read the Panama Papers and conclude that globalization offers a fortunate few opportunities to avoid taxes and regulations that are not available to everyone else. And they see the kind of disintegration that accompanies global integration as local communities suffer when major employers lose out to foreign competitors. What will happen going forward? What should happen?
Elites can continue on the current path of pursuing integration projects and defending existing integration, hoping to win enough support that their efforts are not thwarted. On the evidence of the U. S. presidential campaign and the Brexit debate, this strategy may have run its course. This will likely result in a hiatus from new global integration efforts and an effort to preserve what is already in place while relying on technology and growth in the developing world to drive any further integration. The historical precedents of two world wars are hardly encouraging about unmanaged globalization succeeding with neither a strong underwriter of the system nor strong global institutions.
Much more promising is this idea: The promotion of global integration can become a bottom-up rather than a top-down project. The emphasis can shift from promoting integration to managing its consequences. This would mean a shift from international trade agreements to international harmonization agreements, whereby issues such as labor rights and environmental protection would be central. It would also mean devoting as much political capital to the trillions of dollars that escape taxation or evade regulation through cross-border capital flows as we now devote to trade agreements. And it would mean an emphasis on the challenges of middle-class parents everywhere who doubt, but still hope desperately, that their kids can have better lives than they did.
Which of the following can best serve as the title for the passage?
选项
A、Global integration: a project carried out by elites for elites
B、Global harmonization: an alternative for global trade agreements
C、Why the revolt against global integration?
D、Why the support of global economic integration?
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/IMSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Theprincipalholdsthateffortsshouldbemadeinthe________developmentofbothhumanitiesandsocialsciencesalongwithnatu
AlexEzehoftheCentreforGlobalDevelopment,isathink-tankinWashington,remembersshowingKenyanpoliticiansevidencetha
Asthenewepidemicspreadthroughoutthecountry,thegovernmentistryingto________thediseasewithinthatregion.
InterpretthefollowingpassagesfromEnglishintoChinese.Startinterpretingatthesignalandstopatthesignal.Youmaytak
A、ANewTrendinGlobalTourismIndustryB、GlobalTourismIndustryandEmploymentC、GlobalTourismIndustryandMarketingCampai
A、Theyreducedtheemployees’compensations.B、Theyfrozepays.C、Theyfiredmanyworkers.D、Theynolongerofferedpensionorh
GolaxyisanotherartificialintelligenceGoprogramdevelopedbyGooglewhichwillcompeteagainstKeJieinApril.
A、Hehasabigfamily.B、Hehastoworkathome.C、Hismother-in-lawlikestohaveparties.D、Hischildrenarerathernaughty.A
A、Shewilluseherstudytimemoreeffectively.B、Shewillbuysecond-handbooksfromthestore.C、Shewillspendhermoneyons
A、Therearetoomanybooksformetoreadwithinsuchashorttime.B、Althoughtherearetoomanybooks,Icanfinishingreading
随机试题
男性,65岁,支气管扩张症病史40年,高血压病史20年。近1周来,咳嗽、咳痰加重,入院前1天咯血约250ml。入院后仍有间断咯血。查体:血压165/100mmHg,心率105次/分,双肺弥漫湿哕音,以下治疗措施正确的是
小儿结核性脑膜炎中期,主要临床表现为
1型糖尿病的病因是( )
行政合理性原则的主要含义是行政决定应当具有合理性,尤其适用于裁量性行政活动,具体表现为()原则。
混凝土棱柱体轴心抗压强度试验结果的最大值或最小值中,如有一个与中间值之差超过中间值的15%,则取另外两个测值的算术平均值为测定值。()
下列不属于房地产经纪企业中薪酬的支付方式是()。
城市公共停车场的用地总面积可以按城市人口每人______安排。
塔式起重机适用于在范围内()的构件,设备的吊装。
背景材料:某公路隧道为浅埋隧道,设计净高5.0m,净宽14.0m,隧道长280m。隧道区域内主要为中等风化岩石,隧道区域内地表水系较发育,区域内以基岩裂隙水为主,浅部残坡积层赋存松散岩类孔隙水,洞口围岩变化段水系较发达。施工单位针对隧道的特点,加
关于法的作用局限性的原因,下列说法正确的有
最新回复
(
0
)