首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The Amazon-Walmart Showdown That Explains the Modern Economy [A] With Amazon buying the high-end grocery chain Whole Foods, some
The Amazon-Walmart Showdown That Explains the Modern Economy [A] With Amazon buying the high-end grocery chain Whole Foods, some
admin
2020-11-04
93
问题
The Amazon-Walmart Showdown That Explains the Modern Economy
[A] With Amazon buying the high-end grocery chain Whole Foods, something retail analysts have known for years is now apparent to everyone: The online retailer is on a collision course with Walmart to try to be the predominant seller of pretty much everything you buy. Each one is trying to become more like the other—Walmart by investing heavily in its technology, Amazon by opening physical bookstores and now buying physical supermarkets. But this is more than a battle between two business titans. Their rivalry sheds light on the shifting economics of nearly every major industry.
[B] That in turn has been a boon(福音)for consumers but also has more worrying implications for jobs, wages and inequality. To understand this epic shift, you can look not just to the grocery business, but also to my closet, and to another retail acquisition announced Friday morning.
[C] Men’s dress clothing, mine included, can be a little boring. Like many male office workers, I lean toward clothes that are sharp but not at all showy. Nearly every weekday, I wear a dress shirt that is either light blue, white or has some subtle check pattern, usually paired with slacks and a blazer. The description alone could make a person doze. I used to buy my dress shirts from a Hong Kong tailor. They fit perfectly, but ordering required an awkward meeting with a visiting salesman in a hotel suite. They took six weeks to arrive, and they cost around $ 120 each, which adds up fast when you need to buy eight or 10 a year to keep up with wear and tear(破损). Then several years ago I realized that a company called Bonobos was making shirts that fit me nearly as well, that were often sold three for $ 220, or $ 73 each, and that would arrive in two days.
[D] Bonobos became my main shirt provider, at least until recently, when I learned that Amazon was trying to get into the upper-end men’s shirt game. The firm’s " Buttoned Down" line, offered to Amazon Prime customers, uses high-quality fabric and is a good value at $ 40 for basic shirts. I bought a few: they don’t fit me quite as well as the Bonobos, but I do prefer the stitching(针脚). I’m on the fence as to which company will provide my next shirt order, and a new deal this week makes it interesting: Walmart is buying Bonobos. Walmart’s move might seem a strange decision. It is not a retailer people typically turn to for $ 88 summer weight shirts in Ruby Wynwood Plaid or $ 750 Italian wool suits. Then again, Amazon is best known as a reseller of goods made by others.
[E] Walmart and Amazon have had their sights on each other for years, each aiming to be the dominant seller of goods—however consumers of the future want to buy them. It increasingly looks like that " however" is a hybrid of physical stores and online-ordering channels, and each company is coming at the goal from a different starting point.
[F] Amazon is the dominant player in online sales, and is particularly strong among affluent consumers in major cities. It is now experimenting with physical bookstores and groceries as it looks to broaden its reach. Walmart has thousands of stores that sell hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of goods. It is particularly strong in suburban and rural areas and among low- and middle-income consumers, but it’s playing catch-up with online sales and affluent urbanites.
[G] Why are these two mega-retailers both trying to sell me shirts? The short answer is because they both want to sell everything. More specifically, Bonobos is known as an innovator in exactly this type of hybrid of online and physical store sales. Its website and online customer service are excellent, and it operates stores in major cities where you can try on garments and order items to be shipped directly. Because all the actual inventory is centralized, the stores themselves can occupy minimal square footage. So the acquisition may help Walmart build expertise in the very areas where it is trying to gain on Amazon. You can look at the Amazon acquisition of Whole Foods through the same lens. The grocery business has a whole different set of challenges from the types of goods that Amazon has specialized in: you can’t store a steak or a banana the way you do books or toys. And people want to be able to make purchases and take them home on the spur of the moment.
[H] Just as Walmart is using Bonobos to get access to higher-end consumers and a more technologically savvy way of selling clothes, Amazon is using Whole Foods to get the expertise and physical presence it takes to sell fresh foods. But bigger dimensions of the modern economy also come into play.
[I] The apparel business has long been a highly competitive industry in which countless players could find a niche(商机). Any insight that one shirt-maker developed could be rapidly copied by others, and consumer prices reflected the retailer’s real estate costs and branding approach as much as anything. That helps explain why there are thousands of options worldwide for someone who wants a decent-quality men’s shirt. In that world, any shirt-maker that tried to get too big rapidly faced diminishing returns. It would have to pay more and more to lease the real estate for far-flung stores, and would have to outbid competitors to hire all the experienced shirt-makers. The expansion wouldn’t offer any meaningful cost savings and would entail a lot more headaches trying to manage it all.
[J] But more and more businesses in the modern economy, rather than reflecting those diminishing returns to scale, show positive returns to scale: The biggest companies have a huge advantage over smaller players. That tends to tilt markets toward a handful of players or even a monopoly, rather than an even playing field with countless competitors.
[K] The most extreme example of this would be the software business, where a company can invest bottomless sums in a piece of software, but then sell it to each additional customer for practically nothing. The apparel industry isn’t that extreme—the price of making a shirt is still linked to the cost of fabric and the workers to do the stitching—but it is moving in that direction. And that helps explain why Walmart and Amazon are so eager to put a shirt on my back.
[L] Already, retailers need to figure out how to manage sophisticated supply chains connecting Southeast Asia with stores in big American cities so that they rarely run out of product. They need mobile apps and websites that offer a seamless user experience so that nothing stands between a would-be purchaser and an order. Larger companies that are good at supply chain management and technology can spread those more-or-less fixed costs around more total sales, enabling them to keep prices lower than a niche player and entrench their advantage.
[M] These positive returns to scale could become even more pronounced. Perhaps in the future, rather than manufacture a bunch of shirts in Indonesia and Malaysia and ship them to the United States to be sold one at a time to urban office workers, a company will have a robot manufacture shirts to my specifications somewhere nearby.
[N] If that’s the future of clothing, and quite a few companies are working on just that, apparel will become a landscape of high fixed costs and enormous returns to scale. The handful of companies with the very best shirt-making robots will win the market, and any company that can’t afford to develop shirt-making robots, or isn’t very good at it, might find itself left in the cold.
Bonobos is selling apparel to the author in a relatively lower price than the Hong Kong tailor.
选项
答案
C
解析
[C]段指出,作者过去经常在香港裁缝处制衣,每件花费约120美元,而Bonobos公司的衬衣每件仅需73美元,即后者比前者的价格低。题干中的in a relatively lower price是定位句中两者价格的对比结果,故选[C]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/IkP7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
A、You’dbettersmileorlaughfromthebottomofyourheart.B、Youcan’tfoolyourbodybypretendingtobehappy.C、Asmartmi
A、Afitnessprogramofferedtothegeneralpublic.B、Aphysicalexercisetobuildupmuscles.C、Aprogramthatmakespeoplekeep
黄山(MountHuang)位于安徽省黄山市,取自“黄帝之山”之意。黄山是世界自然和文化双遗产,也是中国最著名的国家级风景区之一。黄山集中国各大名山的美景于一身,以奇松、怪石、云海、温泉“四绝”著称于世。它不仅景色雄伟俏丽,而且资源丰富、生态完整,具有重
A、Bycoach.B、Bybus.C、Bycar.D、Bytrain.C由选项可知,此题考查使用某个交通工具。因此听音重点应放在它们之间的比较上。短文提到自行驾车前往是最好的选择,而且该购物中心提供12000个免费停车位,可推断C是最佳
A、Overdoseofdrugs.B、Lackofnutrition.C、Lackofphysicalexercise.D、Imbalanceinbrainactivity.DDr.Brdesen认为包括生活方式在内的很多因素
A、Itcan’tpredictthetimefortheunstableeconomyanditsseverity.B、Itislackinginhistoricalreview,referenceandaccum
茶是中国人的一种特殊饮料,在中国人的日常生活中占有重要的地位。作为世界茶叶主要出产国之一,中国的茶叶种类繁多,具有代表性的有绿茶、红茶、乌龙茶(oolongtea)、白茶等。不同的茶叶具有不同的功效,长期饮用对身体有很大益处。茶文化在中国历史悠久,喝茶一
在竞争激烈的现代社会,拥有高技能、高素质的人就有更多的优势,因而种类繁多的培训班便应运而生。
人为灾害
当前,中小学生普遍存在民族文化艺术鉴赏力下降的问题。为传承民族优秀文化,教育部对九年制义务教育阶段的音乐课程标准进行了修订,增加了有关京剧的教学内容,并在10个省、市、自治区各选20所中小学进行试点。开设京剧课后,教师不能仅满足于演唱技巧的教授,而且应
随机试题
2009年5月11日晚,济南市“一九”烧烤街(经一纬九的无证烧烤街是槐荫区乃至济南市有名的羊肉串烧烤一条街)上飘荡了近30年的烤肉烟气彻底散去!按照市区两级党委政府关于开展城市环境综合整治的有关要求,由五里沟办事处牵头,会同槐荫区城管执法局、区工商分局、区
理性决策模式通常又被称为【】
在评价乳剂的稳定性时,相当于1年的自然分层的效果是
下列行为中构成非法经营同类营业罪的有:()
背景资料:某高速公路,路面为沥青混凝土路面,基层为水泥稳定土基层,施工单位在基层施工过程中,出现以下情况:(1)由于本工程的路面属高级路面,所以采用水泥稳定细粒土做该路面的基层。(2)在选择水泥时,施工单位选择了终凝时间较短的水泥。(3)该
若劳动与资本的投入组合处于投入产出生产函数等产量线的垂直部分,则()。
A注册会计师负责审计甲公司2010年度财务报表。在针对销售费用的发生认定实施细节测试时,A注册会计师决定采用传统变量抽样方法实施统计抽样,相关事项如下:(1)A注册会计师将抽样单元界定为销售费用总额中的每个货币单元。(2)A注册会计
下列关于宣告死亡与宣告失踪表述正确的有()。
根据下图回答下列问题。“十五”时期粮食产量与增长速度
在一个除法算式里.被除数、除数、商和余数之和是319.已知商是21.余数是6.问被除数址多少?()
最新回复
(
0
)