首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
As more people live closer together, and as they use machines to produce leisure, they find that their leisure, and even their w
As more people live closer together, and as they use machines to produce leisure, they find that their leisure, and even their w
admin
2010-07-19
55
问题
As more people live closer together, and as they use machines to produce leisure, they find that their leisure, and even their working hours, become spoilt by a by-product of their machines--namely, noise. Noise is nowadays in the news; it has acquired political status, and public opinion is demanding, more and more insistently, that something be done about it. So it was very appropriate’ that many people professionally interested in noise control should meet to discuss their common problems at a large-scale conference. In the three days of the Conference at Teddington, 25 papers were presented; and faced with the pile of texts, whose contents ranged from sophisticated aerodynamics to general comments on the irritation expressed by neighbours, it was difficult to sort out the new ideas which remain active in one’s mind six months from now, from the big mass of valuable knowledge and facts which will remain on the shelves for reference.
This difficulty was faced by Mr. D. W. Robinson, head of the acoustics work at the National Physical Laboratory. His introduction elaborated the general idea that noise must be considered in relation to the social organism which produces it. Sound becomes annoying noise only when someone’s opinion has made it so. In terms of energy, it is an undesired byproduct, often an exceedingly small fraction of the main output of the machine or process which produces it, and correspondingly difficult to reduce significantly. To control noise is going to demand much self-discipline (annoyance arises often from lack of common courtesy and imagination), a sense of proportion (there is usually a conflict of interest if a noise is to be stopped), the expenditure of money (and it is far more economical to do this early rather than late), and, finally, technical knowledge.
Technical difficulties often arise from the subjective-objective nature of the problem. You can define the excessive speed of a motor Car in terms of a pointer reading on a speedometer. But can you define excessive noise in the same way? The results of several large-scale experiments, involving numbers of vehicles and of listeners, show how difficult it is to fix any instrumental reading as a legal limit in a way which satisfies most of the public and yet is fair to the vehicle owner. You, find, for example, that with any existing simple "noise meter", vehicles which are judged to be equally noisy by a jury may show considerable difference on the meter.
A group of papers dealt with noise, at the source--the basic origins of noise in gears, internal combustion engines, fans and jets. The prospect of a significant reduction in noise output from jet engines of the future was one of the most important questions discussed at the conference. Though the ideal cure for noise is to stop it at its source, this may in many cases be impossible. The next weapon in the anti-noise armory is to absorb it in transit to the ear.
It is a common fallacy that a sound absorbent such as glass wool is opaque to sound and is therefore the best way of diminishing annoying noise from the flat next door. In a normally furnished room, lining a wall with absorbent will have little effect on the noise level built up by reverberation; and will contribute hardly anything to the acoustic opacity of the wall. In a typical factory building, even if all available surfaces are covered with absorbent, the noise level is unlikely to drop by more than five decibels. A consultant will often recommend light partitioning, and partial screening round noisy machines, as a more of the Conference at Teddington, 25 papers were presented; and faced with the pile of texts, whose contents ranged from sophisticated aerodynamics to general comments on the irritation expressed by neighbours, it was difficult to sort out the new ideas which remain active in one’s mind six months from now, from the big mass of valuable knowledge and facts which will remain on the shelves for reference.
This difficulty was faced by Mr. D. W. Robinson, head of the acoustics work at the National Physical Laboratory. His introduction elaborated the general idea that noise must be considered in relation to the social organism which produces it. Sound becomes annoying noise only when someone’s opinion has made it so. In terms of energy, it is an undesired byproduct, often an exceedingly small fraction of the main output of the machine or process which produces it, and correspondingly difficult to reduce significantly. To control noise is going to demand much self-discipline (annoyance arises often from lack of common courtesy and imagination), a sense of proportion (there is usually a conflict of interest if a noise is to be stopped), the expenditure of money (and it is far more economical to do this early rather than late), and, finally, technical knowledge.
Technical difficulties often arise from the subjective-objective nature of the problem. You can define the excessive speed of a motor Car in terms of a pointer reading on a speedometer. But can you define excessive noise in the same way? The results of several large-scale experiments, involving numbers of vehicles and of listeners, show how difficult it is to fix any instrumental reading as a legal limit in a way which satisfies most of the public and yet is fair to the vehicle owner. You, find, for example, that with any existing simple "noise meter", vehicles which are judged to be equally noisy by a jury may show considerable difference on the meter.
A group of papers dealt with noise, at the source--the basic origins of noise in gears, internal combustion engines, fans and jets. The prospect of a significant reduction in noise output from jet engines of the future was one of the most important questions discussed at the conference. Though the ideal cure for noise is to stop it at its source, this may in many cases be impossible. The next weapon in the anti-noise armory is to absorb it in transit to the ear.
It is a common fallacy that a sound absorbent such as glass wool is opaque to sound and is therefore the best way of diminishing annoying noise from the flat next door. In a normally furnished room, lining a wall with absorbent will have little effect on the noise level built up by reverberation; and will contribute hardly anything to the acoustic opacity of the wall. In a typical factory building, even if all available surfaces are covered with absorbent, the noise level is unlikely to drop by more than five decibels. A consultant will often recommend light partitioning, and partial screening round noisy machines, as a more effective and a more economical course.
Domestic noises may perhaps be controlled by forethought and courtesy and industrial noises by good planning and technical improvement. But, if we are going to allow fast motor-cycles and heavy diesel lorries to pass continuously through residential and business property, the community as a whole must decide on the control it needs to exercise, for in the long run, it has got to pay for it. And if a nation is to take a leading part in modern air transport, it must enter into international agreements on the noise control measures it will impose at its airports and here the cost of any real control is immediately to be measured in millions of pounds.
What has this report to say about the effectiveness of sound absorbents?
选项
A、Such absorbents as glass wool is the best way of diminishing noise.
B、Lining a wall with absorbent will reduce the noise level considerably.
C、Covering the surfaces of a factory building with absorbent is ineffective in control noise.
D、Screening partially noisy machines will eliminate noise.
答案
C
解析
此题四个选项分别对应第五段的四句话。第一句指出认为glass wool是削减隔壁住房噪音的最好方法是一个谬论(It is a common fallacy),因此A不对。第二句指出在墙上贴吸音材料对噪音的减少影响很少(have little effect on)。第四句指出部分遮蔽噪音大的机器是更有效更经济的方法。但是并没有说这能消除噪音,因此D也不对。第三句提到即使把工厂所有可能的地方贴上吸音材料,噪音也至多减少五分贝,因此选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/IwlO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Indozensofyears,therearemorecasesoftheinvasionofalienspeciespartlybecauseAccordingtothetext,thesuccessof
WhichofthefollowingisTRUEofSirWilfredThesiger?SirWilfredThesiger’sbehaviorhascalledforthsomecriticismpartly
Today,scienceandtechnologydevelopveryfast,andbooksonscientificandtechnologicalknowledgearepublishedatarateof
WecanconcludethatIsabelBurton______.AlthoughhewasemployedbyForeignOffice,RichardBurtonwas______.
Inthewriter’sopinion,inEnglandalcoholandtobaccomay______.Whatopinionsdomostsocialreformershold?
Whichofthefollowingisthemaincauseofglobalwarming?
TheReader’sDigestinvestigationaskedAmericanswhichwasthebiggestthreattothenation’sfuture--bigbusiness,biglaboro
InanewbookcalledPredictions,someoftheworld’sgreatestthinkerspresentavisionofthefuturewithovertonesofascien
Tomorroweveningabout20millionAmericanswillbeshown,ontheirtelevisionscreens,howeasyitistostealplutonium(钚)an
A、Aproperdietandtablets.B、Anewkidneyforhim.C、Insulininjections.D、Anoperationtoremovesugar.C
随机试题
李某不服县工商局吊销营业执照的行政处罚,向县人民政府申请行政复议,县人民政府以该申请应向市工商局为由不愿受理。以下做法正确的是()。
喉腔侧壁上的结构有
犬,2岁,证见尿频,尿急,尿痛,尿液混浊、淋漓不畅,口色红,舌苔黄腻,脉滑数。该病症为
不易癌变的白斑类别是
在持有人利益得到保护的前提下,成员国监管机关可允许基金100%投资于政府或国际组织发行或担保的证券,但在此情形下,应投资于不少于()个主体发行的证券。
某生产性外商投资企业纳税年度内有关生产经营情况如下:(1)取得产品销售净额4000万元,取得租金收入300万元。(2)应扣除的产品销售成本为3200万元,与租金收入有关的费用支出为220万元。(3)应缴纳的增值税为30万元,消费税为75万元,营业税为
《韩非子·内储说上七术》有一段关于法治理论的著名比喻:“火形严,故人献灼;水形懦,人多溺。”大意是“法律如有威严,像火一样使人望而生畏,百姓不敢以身试法,这样,国家就容易治理,人民得以安居乐业;反之,若过于宽大,执法不严,百姓不知畏法,反而容易因违法而受到
IP地址块192.168.133.128./26的子网掩码可写为()。
______wasnotoneofthegreatest20thcenturyAmericanplaywrights.
Anewstudyshowsalargegendergaponeconomicpolicyamongthenation’sprofessionaleconomists,adividesimilartothegend
最新回复
(
0
)