首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Preschoolers’ Innate Knowledge Means They Can Probably Do Algebra Child development specialists are uncovering evidence that
Preschoolers’ Innate Knowledge Means They Can Probably Do Algebra Child development specialists are uncovering evidence that
admin
2015-03-28
39
问题
Preschoolers’ Innate Knowledge Means They Can Probably Do Algebra
Child development specialists are uncovering evidence that toddlers may understand much more than we think.
[A] Give a three-year old a smart phone and she’ll likely figure out how to turn it on and operate a few simple functions. But confront her with an algebra problem and ask her to solve for x? Not likely.
[B] For decades, child developmental psychologist Jean Piaget convinced us that young, undeveloped minds couldn’t handle complex concepts because they simply weren’t experienced or mature enough yet. Piaget, in fact, believed that toddlers could not understand cause and effect, that they couldn’t think logically, and that they also couldn’t handle abstract ideas.
[C] That’s because, he argued, children learn to develop these higher skills through trial and error. But child development specialists are finding out that preschoolers without any formal education may have the capacity to understand more complex concepts than we give them credit for, such as complicated rules for operating a toy or even solving for an unknown in algebra. Some of this is due to their ability to be more open and flexible about their world than adults. But beyond that, toddlers may have the innate ability to understand abstract concepts like quantities and causality, and that’s fueling an exciting stream of experiments that reveal just how sophisticated preschoolers’ brains might be.
[D] Alison Gopnik, professor of psychology at University of California Berkeley and her team devised a way to test how well young kids understand the abstract concept of multiple causality — the idea that there may be more than one cause for a single effect. They pitted 32 preschoolers around 4 years old against 143 un-dergrads. The study centered around a toy that could be turned on by placing a single blue-colored block on the toy’s tray, but could also be activated if two blocks of different colors — orange and purple — were placed on the tray. Both the kids and the undergraduates were shown how the toy worked and then asked which blocks activated the toy.
[E] The preschoolers were adept at figuring out that the blue blocks turned on the toy, as did the purple and orange ones. The Berkeley undergraduates, however, had a harder time accepting the scenario.Their previous experience in the world, which tends to work in a single-cause-equals-single-effect way, hampered their ability to accept the unusual rules that activated they toy; they wanted to believe that it was activated either by a single color or by a combination of colors, but not both.
[F] The preschoolers’ lack of bias about causality likely contributed to their ability to learn the multiple ways to activate the toy, but the results also suggest that preschoolers really can think logically and in more complicated ways. Just because they can’t express themselves or aren’t as adept at demonstrating such knowledge, doesn’t mean they don’t have it.
[G] Researchers from Johns Hopkins University, for example, found a similar effect among preschoolers when it came to math. Previous studies showed that if you present infants with eight objects over and over until they got bored, and then showed them 16, they suddenly regained interest and sensed that things changed. "All the evidence so far leads us to believe that this is something that babies come into the world with," says Melissa Kibbe, co-author of that study.
[H] She and her colleague Lisa Feigenson wondered if that innate sense of quantity might translate into an understanding of numbers and higher math functions, including solving for unknowns — one of the foundations of algebra — which often isn’t taught until seventh or eighth grades. So they conducted a series of experiments using a cup with a fixed amount of objects that substituted for x in the equation 5 + x=17.
[I] To divert the four- and six-year olds’ attention away from Arabic numerals to quantities instead, the researchers used a puppet and a "magic" cup that contained 12 buttons. In one of the experiments, the children saw five buttons on the table. After watching the researchers add the 12 buttons from the cup, they were told there were 17 buttons on the table. In another test, the youngsters saw three piles of objects — buttons, coins or small toys — in varying amounts, and observed the researchers adding the fixed number of contents of the puppet’s cup to each.
[J] After training the kids on how the cup worked, the researchers tried to confuse them with another cup containing fewer (such as four) or more (such as 24) objects. However, the kids understood intuitively that the decoy cup contained the wrong amount of items and that a specific amount — x, the "magic" cup amount — had to be added to reach the sum. That suggested that the preschoolers had some concept of quantity. What surprised Kibbe was not just that preschoolers understood the concept of adding "more," but that they could also calibrate how much more was needed to fill in the unknown quantity.
[K] "These kids had very little formal schooling so far, but what we are finding is that when we tap into their gut sense, something we call the Approximate Number Sense (ANS), kids are able to do much more complex calculations than if we gave them numbers and letters," says Kibbe of her results. And there doesn’t seem to be any gender differences in this innate ability, at least not among the girls and boys Kibbe studied.
[L] There’s also precedent for such innate pre-learning in reading, says Jon Star, at the Harvard University Graduate School of Education. To improve reading skills, some teachers have tapped into children’s memorization skills to make the connection between words and meaning more efficient.
[M] Kibbe’s and Gopnik’s recent work may have broader implications for education, since current math curricula in schools, which focuses on teaching Arabic numerals and on solving equations, may not be ideal for nurturing the number sense that kids are born with. "There’s an exciting movement in psychology over the past decade, as we learn that students bring certain capabilities, or innate knowledge that we hadn’t thought they had before," says Star.
[N] Though it may be too early to translate such findings to the classroom, the results lay the groundwork for studying similar innate skills and how they might be better understood. ANS, for example, is one of many constructs that young children may have that could enhance their learning but that current curricula aren’t exploiting. Developmental experts are still trying to figure out how malleable these constructs are, and how much of an impact they can have on future learning. For instance, do kids who hone their ANS skills become better at algebra and calculus in high school? "We still need to figure out which constructs matter most, and which are most amenable to interventions to help children improve their learning," says Star.
[O] "The hard part is, educationally, how do you build up and upon this intuitive knowledge in a way that allows a child to capture the complexity but not hold them back," says Tina Grotzer, associate professor of education at Harvard. Tapping into a child’s still developing sense of numbers and quantities is one thing, but overloading it with too many new constructs about algebra, unknowns, and problem solving may just gum up the working memory and end up adversely affecting his learning and academic performance.
[P] Still, that doesn’t mean that these innate skills shouldn’t be explored and possibly exploited in the class-room. Preschoolers may be smarter than we think, but we still have to figure out how to give them the right opportunities in the classroom so they know what to do with that knowledge.
Too many new constructs about algebra, unknowns, and problem solving may have some negative effects on a child’s learning.
选项
答案
O
解析
段末句提到,如果过多地充斥代数、未知数和问题解决方面的新构念,人的记忆功能可能就会变得混乱,并最终对孩子的学习和学业成绩产生不利影响。由此可见,过多地充斥代数、未知数和问题解决方面的新构念可能会对孩子的学业产生消极影响。本题是对该信息的转述。题中的have some negative effects对应文中的adversely affcting。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Jeh7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
Ataneventwherealleyesareonnewcarsfromworld-classdesigners,buddingautomotivedesignersaregettingtheirfeetwetw
It’sdifficulttoestimatethenumberofyoungstersinvolvedinhomeschooling,wherechildrenarenotsenttoschoolandreceiv
A、Itisanuncommoninfectiousdisease.B、Itdestroysthepatient’sabilitytothink.C、Itisadiseaseverydifficulttodiagno
Cellphonesprovideinstantaccesstopeople.Theyarecreatingamajor【C1】______inthesocialexperiencesofbothchildrenand
围棋(go)于四千多年前起源于中国,是一种重要的棋盘游戏,并在一千多年前就先后传到朝鲜半岛(peninsula)和日本,为东北亚人们普遍喜爱。每年中、日、韩之间有多种围棋比赛,围棋成为文化交流的工具。围棋不仅是竞赛项目,也是一种游戏活动,文人(litera
StatesExperimentwithOut-of-ClassroomLearning[A]AttheendofAugust,mostofOhio’steenagerswillshakeofftheirsummerti
A、Byfollowingpeoplearound.B、Byusingfaciallooksandbodygestures.C、Byjumpinganddancing.D、Bybarkingandyelling.B短文
Mytopicishandedness—whetherindifferentsportsitisbettertobeleftorright-sidedorwhetheramorebalancedapproachis
Mytopicishandedness—whetherindifferentsportsitisbettertobeleftorright-sidedorwhetheramorebalancedapproachis
西藏高原(Tibetanplateau)的面积约占中国领土的四分之一,其中大部分极为偏远,荒无人烟(inhospitable),南部边界贯穿了世界上最高的山脉——让人望而生畏的(formidable)喜马拉雅山(Himalayas),山脉中部是暴露在风中
随机试题
根据公共政策目标所着眼的时间范围,可把公共政策目标分为()
对于血清中数种蛋白质抗原成分的分析,常可采用
女,35岁,5个月来间歇性胸背剧痛。体检:右侧下肢肌力Ⅳ度伴膝、踝反射亢进,Babinski征阳性。右踝振动觉消失,左胸下痛温觉消失。余神经系统无异常。胸椎平片无异常。可能诊断为
根据我国的会计相关法规,下列哪个单位不得使用中文以外其他语言文字编制会计记录?()
计划协调技术原理是首先应用网络图形式来表达一项计划中各种工作的先后顺序和相互关系。()
当物价上涨率高于财政收入增长率时,财政收入会出现()。
教育只能适应儿童的发展,而不能促进儿童的发展。()
个人独资企业解散后,按照《个人独资企业法》的规定,原投资人对企业存续期间的债务是否承担责任?()
下列各句中加下划线成语使用有误的一项是()。
(2013年上半年上午试题51)采用顺序表和单链表存储长度为n的线性序列,根据序号查找元素,其时间复杂度分别为________。
最新回复
(
0
)