首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Publicising his imminent new series about the evolution of animals, Sir David Attenborough said this week that he thought a redu
Publicising his imminent new series about the evolution of animals, Sir David Attenborough said this week that he thought a redu
admin
2015-01-10
60
问题
Publicising his imminent new series about the evolution of animals, Sir David Attenborough said this week that he thought a reduction in human population in this century is impossible and "we’re lucky to be living when we are, because things are going to get worse". People will look back in another 100 years "at a world that was less crowded, full of natural wonders, and healthier". His is a common view and one I used to share. He longs for people to enjoy the open spaces and abundant herds of game that he has been fortunate enough to see. To that end he thinks it vital that there should be fewer of us. I would now disagree with his two premises. It’s actually quite likely, rather than impossible, that population will be falling by the end of this century and that the people alive then will have lots more wilderness to explore and wildlife to admire than today.
The rate at which world population grows has roughly halved from 2 per cent a year in the 1960s to roughly 1per cent a year now. Even the total number of people added to the annual population has been dropping for nearly 30 years. If those declines continue, they will hit zero in about 2070. In recent decades the birth rate has fallen in every part of the world. Fertility in Bangladesh has fallen from nearly 7 children per woman in the 1960s to just over 2 today; Kenya from 8 to 4. 5; Brazil 5. 7 to 1. 8; Ireland 3. 9 to 2.
It is still conventional wisdom that the only way to get population growth down is to be nasty to people, albeit with noble motives. You must coerce, bribe, shame or educate them into having fewer babies against their preferences. China did indeed bring down its birth rate with one-child policy. India tried to introduce coerced sterilization in the 1960s in return for food aid from America, but was defeated by popular protest and democracy.
Yet everywhere else voluntary birth control proved a more effective weapon than coercion, and the birth rate came down just as fast. This was because nice things happened: economic growth, female emancipation and, above all, the conquest of child mortality. So long as women have some access to the means of birth control, then one of the best predictors of a falling birth rate is a falling child mortality rate. Once they think their kids will survive, they start investing in them, rather than in having more kids. You can see this in the statistics. There is no country on Earth with a child mortality rate below 10 per 1,000 births that has a fertility higher than 3 children per woman; whereas all countries except one(Swaziland)that have a child mortality rate above 100 also have a fertility rate above 4. 5. Keep kids alive and you bring down population growth.
Which is why the recent plummeting of child mortality in Africa is such good news for Sir David and others with his concerns. Thanks to rapid economic growth, better governance and much improved public health, most African countries are now experiencing child-mortality falls of 5 per cent or more a year. These falls will surely soon be followed, as night follows day, by an even faster fall in birth rates. Europe, Asia and Latin America have already gone through this transition and most countries are producing babies at or below replacement rate of 2. 2 per woman, at which population stabilizes. Africa is following suit almost exactly.
For this reason alone, I suspect the world population will stop growing and begin to shrink even earlier than 2070. But even if it does not, there is good reason to reassure Sir David that our great grandchildren will have more wildlife to look at than he has had. An ingenious study by Rockefeller University scientists has recently calculated that even with population continuing to grow, we have almost certainly already passed "peak farmland", because of the rate at which fertilisers are improving yields. We will feed nine or ten billion people in 2070 from a considerably smaller acreage than we need to feed seven billion today.
Land sparing is already occurring on a grand scale. Forest cover is increasing in many parts of the world, from Scotland to Bangladesh. Wildlife populations are booming in Europe, in the polar regions and North America and this is happening fastest in the richest countries. According to one recent report, animal populations grew by 6 % in Europe, North America and Northern Asia between 1970 and 2012, while shrinking in tropical regions. There is almost a perfect correlation between the severity of conservation problems and poverty, because the richer people get, the less they try to live off the land and compete with nature—the less they seek bushmeat and charcoal from the forest.
Once again, Africa may spring a pleasant surprise. Over the decades agricultural yields in Africa hardly budged while they doubled or quadrupled in most of Asia. That is entirely down to a dearth of fertilizer and it is beginning to change. If African yields were to rise, the acreage devoted to farmland globally would start to fall even faster, releasing more and more land for "rewilding". The great herds and flocks that so delight Sir David would reassemble in more and more places. The happy conclusion is that making people better off and making nature better off are not in opposition; they go hand in hand.
Which of the following statements is not in alignment with the others in its theme?
选项
A、More countries are producing babies at or below replacement rate of 2. 2 per women.
B、In half a century’s time human population growth has been cut by 50%.
C、African countries are experiencing child-mortality falls of 5% or more a year.
D、Fertility in Bangladesh(7 to 2), Kenya(8 to 4. 5), Brazil(5. 7 to 1. 8), Iran(6. 8 to 1. 9), Ireland(3. 9 to 2)has fallen greatly in recent decades.
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/NxSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Onthe________inthecountryside,thereareonlyone-tenthasmanydoctorsasthereareinthecity.
Theschooldecidedtotrimtheirteachingmethodsaccordingtothestudents’________.
下面你将听到一段关于中国法制建设的讲话。当今是法行天下的时代。国运之兴盛,政治之昌明,社会之稳定,经济之发展,民族之团结,文化之繁荣,人民之安居乐业,都离不开法律之维系和法律之保障。中国也不例外。一个国家采取什么样的治国方略,关系着国家的前途和命
奥运会主中心区将设在奥林匹克公园内。北京奥林匹克公园位于北京城市中轴线的北端,占地1215公顷,其中有760公顷的森林公园,与北京市著名的中关村大学区、历史风景名胜区和大型住宅区相邻。奥运村、记者村、主新闻中心、国际广播电视中心及14座比赛场馆,中国体育博
A、NoneofthemwereseriouslywoundedB、Theywereburiedbythedebrisaftertheexplosion.C、Theydidn’twanttheirnamesorag
Theeconomyurgesthegovernmenttotakemeasurestocountertheinflationandloweringsalaries.
Theeconomyurgesthegovernmenttotakemeasurestocountertheinflationandloweringsalaries.
Theworldpopulationwasnomorethan5.7billionbeforetheProgrammewasenforced.
A、ProfessorJohnsonspoketousagainonWednesday.B、ProfessorJohnsontalkedaboutweedsonWednesday.C、ProfessorJohnsonwan
上海大华集团公司成立于1990年1月,是一家跨地区,跨行业,跨所有制的大型集团公司。
随机试题
男,60岁,患风湿性关节炎。常用治疗方案是
A.运动刺激试验B.高血糖抑制试验C.TRH兴奋试验D.高血糖素激发试验E.ACTH兴奋试验诊断嗜铬细胞瘤可选取
下列不属于第二类医疗器械的是
下列有关法律解释的说法中哪一项是不正确的?()
首次公募股票时,募集说明书所引用的最近一期财务会计资料在财务报告截止日后()内有效。
下面是一段心理咨询师与求助者之间的会谈内容:心理咨询师:上次我初步了解了您的资料,这次我们继续来谈谈您的困扰好吗?求助者:好的,我丈夫最近几个月对我不太好,感觉他不再爱我了,你能帮助我让我丈夫再爱我吗?心理咨询师:是
需求定律是指在其他因素(非价格因素)不变的条件下,商品的价格和需求量之间存在反向变动的关系,即价格越低,需求量越大;价格越高,需求量越小。根据上述定义,下列涉及需求定律的是:
某公司招录一名高级销售人员,有4个条件:口才好,有两年以上相关工作经历,本科以上学历,具有本地户口。但是前来应聘的甲、乙、丙、丁四人没有一人全部符合。于是公司最终录取了符合条件最多的一人。现已知:(1)任何两个条件配成一对,都恰好有且只有一人符合
Thereasonwhyhewaslateforschoolis______(今天早上他睡过头了).
A、Thebenefitsofstrongbusinesscompetition.B、Aproposaltoreducethecostofproduction.C、Theexpenseofmodernizingthef
最新回复
(
0
)