首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Do Britain’s Energy Firms Serve the Public Interest? [A]Capitalism is the best and worst of systems. Left to itself, it will emb
Do Britain’s Energy Firms Serve the Public Interest? [A]Capitalism is the best and worst of systems. Left to itself, it will emb
admin
2019-09-18
53
问题
Do Britain’s Energy Firms Serve the Public Interest?
[A]Capitalism is the best and worst of systems. Left to itself, it will embrace the new and uncompromisingly follow the logic of prices and profit, a revolutionary accelerator for necessary change. But it can only ever react to today’s prices, which cannot capture what will happen tomorrow. So, left to itself, capitalism will neglect both the future and the cohesion of the society in which it trades.
[B]What we know, especially after the financial crisis of 2008, is that we can’t leave capitalism to itself. If we want it to work at its best, combining its doctrines with public and social objectives, there is no alternative but to design the markets in which it operates. We also need to try to add in wider obligations than the simple pursuit of economic logic. Otherwise, there lies disaster.
[C]If this is now obvious in banking, it has just become so in energy. Since 2004, consumers’ energy bills have nearly tripled, far more than the rise in energy prices. The energy companies demand returns nearly double those in mass retailing. This would be problematic at any time, but when wages in real terms have fallen by some 10% in five years it constitutes a crisis. John Major, pointing to the mass of citizens who now face a choice between eating or being warm—as he made the case for a high profits tax on energy companies—drove home the social reality. The energy market, as it currently operates, is maladaptive and illegitimate. There has to be changed.
[D]The design of this market is now universally recognised as wrong, universally, that is, excepting the regulator and the government. The energy companies are able to disguise their cost structures because there is no general pool into which they are required to sell their energy—instead opaquely striking complex internal deals between their generating and supply arms. Yet this is an industry where production and consumption is 24/7 and whose production logic requires such energy pooling. The sector has informally agreed, without regulatory challenge, that it should seek a supply margin of 5%—twice that of retailing.
[E]On top the industry also requires long-term price guarantees for investment in renewables and nuclear without any comparable return in lowering its target cost of capital. The national grid, similarly privately owned, balances its profit maximising aims with a need to ensure security of supply. And every commitment to decarbonise British energy supply by 2030 is passed on to the consumer, rich and poor alike, whatever their capacity to pay. It will also lead to negligible new investment unless backed by government guarantees and subsidies. It could scarcely be worse—and with so much energy capacity closing in the next two years constitutes a first-order national crisis.
[F]The general direction of reform is clear. Energy companies should be required to sell their electricity into a pool whose price would become the base price for retail. This would remove the ability to mask the relationship between costs and prices: retail prices would fall as well as rise clearly and unambiguously as pool prices changed.
[G]The grid, which delivers electricity and gas into our homes and is the guarantor that the lights won’t go out, must be in public ownership, as is Network Rail in the rail industry. It should also be connected to a pan-European grid for additional security. Green commitments, or decisions to support developing renewables, should be paid out of general taxation to take the poll tax element out of energy bills, with the rich paying more than the poor for the public good. Because returns on investment take decades in the energy industry, despite what free market fundamentalists argue, the state has to assume financial responsibility of energy investment as it is doing with nuclear and renewables.
[H]The British energy industry has gone from nationalisation to privatisation and back to government control in the space of 25 years. Although the energy industry is nominally in private hands, we have exactly the same approach of government picking winners and dictating investment plans that was followed with disastrous consequences from the Second World War to the mid 1980s. In the 1970s and early 1980s, the consumer got unfair treatment because long-term investment plans and contracts promoted by the government required electricity companies to use expensive local coal.
[I]The energy industry is, once again, controlled by the state. The same underlying drivers dictate policy in the new world of state control. It is not rational economic thinking and public-interested civil servants that determine policy, but interest groups. Going back 30 years, it was the coal industry—both management and unions—and the nuclear industry that dictated policy. Tony Benn said he had "never known such a well-organised scientific, industrial and technical lobby". Today, it is green pressure groups, EU parliamentarians and commissioners and, often, the energy industry itself that are loading burdens on to consumers. When the state controls the energy industry, whether through the back or the front door, it is vested interests(既得利益)that get their way and the consumer who pays.
[J]So how did we get to where we are today? In the late 1980s and early 1990s, the industry was entirely privatised. It was recognised that there were natural monopoly elements and so prices in these areas were regulated. At the same time, the regulator was given a duty to promote competition. From 1998, all domestic energy consumers could switch supplier for the first time and then wholesale markets were liberalised, allowing energy companies to source the cheapest forms of energy. Arguably, this was the high water mark of the liberalisation of the industry.
[K]Privatisation was a great success. Instead of investment policy being dictated by the impulses of government and interest groups, it became dictated by long-term commercial considerations. Sadly, the era of liberalised markets, rising efficiency and lower bills did not last long. Both the recent Labour governments and the coalition have pursued similar policies of intervention after intervention to send the energy industry almost back to where it started.
[L]One issue that unites left and many on the paternalist right is that of energy security. We certainly need government intervention to keep the lights on and ensure that we are not over-dependent on energy from unstable countries. But it should also be noted that there is nothing more insecure than energy arising from a policy determined by vested interests without any concern for commercial considerations. Energy security will not be achieved by requiring energy companies to invest in expensive sources of supply and by making past investments redundant through regulation. It will also not be achieved by making the investment environment even more uncertain. Several companies all seeking the cheapest supplies from diverse sources will best serve the interests of energy security.
[M]The UK once had an inefficient and expensive energy industry. After privatisation, costs fell as the industry served the consumer rather than the mining unions and pro-nuclear interests. Today, after a decade or more of increasing state control, we have an industry that serves vested interests rather than the consumer interest once again. Electricity prices before taxes are now 15% higher than the average of major developed nations. Electricity could be around 50% cheaper without government interventions. We must liberalise again and not complete the circle by returning to nationalisation.
Capitalism is a system that can only respond to what happens today, not tomorrow.
选项
答案
A
解析
根据capitalism锁定A段和B段,本题句子说的是资本主义本身的特质,所以缩小到A段。A段第3句讲资本主义只能对当前的价格产生反应,而捕捉不到未来的事情,题目中的respond to与原文的react to和capture对应。本题句子是A段第3句的同义转述。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/OkW7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
Manycountrieshaveaholidaytocelebrateworkers’rightsonoraroundMay1,butLabourDayinCanadaiscelebratedonthefir
Nottoomanydecadesagoitseemed"obvious"bothtothegeneralpublicandtosociologiststhatmodernsocietyhaschangedpeop
FeedingtheMassesaLoadofManureTheGreenRevolutionMyth,NormanBorlaug,andWorldHunger[A]Mostpeopledo
A、Itletsblindpeopleexperiencefamouspaintings.B、ItiscalledAccesstoMuseumsforBlindandVisuallyImpairedpeople.C、I
Beinginchargehasitsbenefits:Moremoney,morecontrol,morepower,andapparently,morejobsatisfaction.Recentlythe
VictoriaBarzilaiopenedhermouthwidesothedoctorcouldlookathersorethroat.Not【C1】______aremarkableevent,excepttha
Electroniccigarettesarehandheldnicotine-deliverydevicesthat,despiteadevotedfollowing,arecurrentlyswirlingincontro
It’sagoodideatoapplysunscreenbeforeheadingtothebeachifyoudon’twanttoburn.Butformarineanimalslikewhales,t
A、Inwords.B、Byeyecontact.C、Byclappinghands.D、Byraisinghand.C该题问面对演讲者的问题,听众如何互动,在录音最后,演讲者让听众通过拍手的方式来表示yes,故C为正确答案。
A、Lookedforcaves.B、Burnedtrees.C、Wenttothesea.D、Builtwoodenhouses.D女士说:“在一些气候比较温暖的地方,冰河时期的人确实建了木屋。”D符合对话中的意思。
随机试题
下列的主页地址有效的是()。
烤瓷合金中哪种金属含量过高可能导致瓷修复体变色A.金B.银C.铜D.铁E.钴
男,54岁。肝硬化腹水,24小时尿钠11mmol(正常值130~261mm01),24小时尿钾117mmol(正常值51~102mmol)。选用何种利尿剂较好
患儿,男,8个月,患有“法洛四联症”,近2天来低热,流涕,轻咳,在一次哭闹突然出现呼吸困难,心率增快,发绀加重,随即昏厥、抽搐,产生此现象最可能的原因是
关于液体制剂的溶剂叙述正确的是()。
A.门冬酰胺酶注射剂B.地塞米松注射液C.链霉素注射剂D.阿仑膦酸盐E.鱼鲑降钙素《中国药典临床用药须知》2010年版规定必须做皮肤敏感试验的药物是
《刑法》第171条第1款前段规定:“出售、购买伪造的货币或者明知是伪造的货币而运输,数额较大的,处三年以下有期徒刑或者拘役,并处二万元以上二十万元以下罚金。”关于本条的理解,下列哪些说法是错误的?()
对于大、中型湖泊与水库,当平均水深小于10m时,取样点在水面下0.5m,但距湖、库底不应小于()m。
()只适用于短期预测,在大多数情况下只用于以月度或周为单位的近期预测。
设齐次线性方程组,其中ab≠0,n≥2.讨论a,b取何值时,方程组只有零解、有无穷多个解?在有无穷多个解时求出其通解.
最新回复
(
0
)